Optimal Blood Sampling Time for Area under the Concentration–Time Curve Estimation of Vancomycin by Assessing the Accuracy of Four Bayesian Software

Effective blood sampling times, beyond trough and peak levels, have not been determined for estimating vancomycin's area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) using the Bayesian software. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AUC estimation at different blood sampling times during the same dosing interval at steady state utilizing data from a prior phase I trial of vancomycin. Six healthy adult participants were sampled following intravenous administration of 1 g vancomycin for 1.5 h every 12 h. The AUC was estimated using four software packages and four population pharmacokinetic models. Accuracy was assessed using bias (difference between the estimated and reference AUC) and imprecision (absolute percentage difference between the estimated and reference AUC). The accuracy varied with the sampling time. The optimal two-point sampling times were determined to be 2.5 and 5.5 h post-injection using software packages for EasyTDM, Practical AUC-guided therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and Anti-MRSA Agents TDM Analysis Software (incorporating Rodvold, Yamamoto, and Yasuhara models). In these estimations, the mean bias (range, -1.7 to 9.5 µg·h/mL) was unbiased and the mean imprecision (range, -3.0% to 5.0%) was precise. The optimal one-point sampling time was 5.5 h post-injection for Anti-MRSA Agents TDM Analysis Software, which incorporated the Yamamoto and Yasuhara models. In conclusion, optimal blood sampling times may vary depending on the software and model used. Our findings suggest that identifying specific sampling times could improve the efficacy of TDM in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b24-00485
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Blood Sampling Time for Area under the Concentration–Time Curve Estimation of Vancomycin by Assessing the Accuracy of Four Bayesian Software

Shinji Kosaka, Kazunori Yamaguchi, Kenta Sumiyoshi, Tatsuya Tai et al.
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

Optimal Blood Sampling Time for Area under the Concentration–Time Curve Estimation of Vancomycin by Assessing the Accuracy of Four Bayesian Software

Shinji Kosaka, Kazunori Yamaguchi, Kenta Sumiyoshi, Tatsuya Tai, Atsushi Tada, Kei Kawada, Naohiro Kurokawa, Hiroaki Tanaka, Shinji Abe, Chiemi Sato, Takahiro Motoki, Takaaki Yamamoto
article en

Abstract

Effective blood sampling times, beyond trough and peak levels, have not been determined for estimating vancomycin's area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) using the Bayesian software. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AUC estimation at different blood sampling times during the same dosing interval at steady state utilizing data from a prior phase I trial of vancomycin. Six healthy adult participants were sampled following intravenous administration of 1 g vancomycin for 1.5 h every 12 h. The AUC was estimated using four software packages and four population pharmacokinetic models. Accuracy was assessed using bias (difference between the estimated and reference AUC) and imprecision (absolute percentage difference between the estimated and reference AUC). The accuracy varied with the sampling time. The optimal two-point sampling times were determined to be 2.5 and 5.5 h post-injection using software packages for EasyTDM, Practical AUC-guided therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and Anti-MRSA Agents TDM Analysis Software (incorporating Rodvold, Yamamoto, and Yasuhara models). In these estimations, the mean bias (range, -1.7 to 9.5 µg·h/mL) was unbiased and the mean imprecision (range, -3.0% to 5.0%) was precise. The optimal one-point sampling time was 5.5 h post-injection for Anti-MRSA Agents TDM Analysis Software, which incorporated the Yamamoto and Yasuhara models. In conclusion, optimal blood sampling times may vary depending on the software and model used. Our findings suggest that identifying specific sampling times could improve the efficacy of TDM in clinical practice.

Biological and Pharmaceutical BulletinVol. 47(12)
Kagawa University Hospital (JP), Tokushima University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.