Evaluating video-supported layperson CPR compared to a standard training course: A randomized controlled trial
While overall performance of correct CPR skills was best following a traditional CPR course, laypersons using real-time video training performed as well as those taking an AHA HeartSaver® course on several key measures including time to chest compressions and compression rate.Trial Registration.NCT05983640.
Authors
- ERIC M. EBERL
- Mohammad Adrian Hasdianda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3100-9660)
- Dawei Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-0075)
- Kathleen Salerno (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1378-4751)
- Scott A. Goldberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1501-6956)
- Ashish R. Panchal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7382-982X)
- Jenson Kaithamattam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9680-8874)
- Rebecca E. Cash (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0355-1014)
- Eric Goralnick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-7973)
- Jeremiah Jacob Tom (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8804-4064)
- Gregory Andrew Peters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0026-9985)
- C. O’Brien
- J. Lees
Institutions
- United States Department of Transportation (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Resuscitation Plus
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100835
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00