KESALAHAN PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN DALAM PROSES PENEGAKAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS CRAIG COLEY DAN IMPLIKASI BAGI SISTEM PERADILAN)

This study discusses the problem of wrongful conviction or errors in sentencing, especially in the context of the death penalty. These errors often occur due to various factors, such as forced interrogation, errors in forensic evidence analysis, and institutional bias. The method used in this study is normative legal research that focuses on the study of literature and primary legal materials, such as laws and regulations and related legal theories. The results of the study indicate that to minimize errors in sentencing, especially in cases of the death penalty, there needs to be reform in interrogation methods, standards of proof, and access to adequate legal aid. The use of modern forensic technology, such as DNA testing, and broader review of death penalty cases have also proven to be effective steps in reducing the risk of wrongful convictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GANEC SWARA
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i4.1129
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KESALAHAN PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN DALAM PROSES PENEGAKAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS CRAIG COLEY DAN IMPLIKASI BAGI SISTEM PERADILAN)

FARHAN DEU
GANEC SWARA
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

KESALAHAN PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN DALAM PROSES PENEGAKAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS CRAIG COLEY DAN IMPLIKASI BAGI SISTEM PERADILAN)

FARHAN DEU
article en

Abstract

This study discusses the problem of wrongful conviction or errors in sentencing, especially in the context of the death penalty. These errors often occur due to various factors, such as forced interrogation, errors in forensic evidence analysis, and institutional bias. The method used in this study is normative legal research that focuses on the study of literature and primary legal materials, such as laws and regulations and related legal theories. The results of the study indicate that to minimize errors in sentencing, especially in cases of the death penalty, there needs to be reform in interrogation methods, standards of proof, and access to adequate legal aid. The use of modern forensic technology, such as DNA testing, and broader review of death penalty cases have also proven to be effective steps in reducing the risk of wrongful convictions.

GANEC SWARAVol. 18(4)
State University of Gorontalo (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

KESALAHAN PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN DALAM PROSES PENEGAKAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS CRAIG COLEY DAN IMPLIKASI BAGI SISTEM PERADILAN) — FARHAN DEU · GANEC SWARA (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS