Predicting Australian energy demand variability using weather data and machine learning

Abstract Managing energy systems requires understanding the variability of energy demand, which on daily timescales is driven primarily by the weather. Historical records of demand typically cover 1–2 decades which may be too short to capture the range of possible demand, particularly for a climate with high interannual variability such as that of Australia. Predicting demand using long records of weather data opens the possibility of more robustly estimating true demand variability. We estimate daily energy demand between 2010 and 2019 for Australian states in the National Electricity Market using machine learning with reanalysis weather variables as predictors. We assess the performance of these models and examine their behaviour to identify which weather variables are most important for predicting demand. We then use the models to estimate demand for the period 1959–2022. We use this 64-year record to quantify how the probability of high demand days can change compared to individual 10-year periods and when conditioned by the phase of the El Ni <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">~</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> o Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Energy demand can be accurately predicted with weather, with median errors of 2%–4% on years omitted from the training. We show that the probability of extreme demand over different 10-year periods can vary from half to twice as likely, depending on the decade. When further conditioned on ENSO phase, the probabilities can be up to 7 times higher than when using the 64-year period, implying a risk of overestimating weather-related energy demand if shorter records are used. We conclude that machine learning methods can accurately predict energy demand using only weather data, enabling us to estimate demand variability over longer time horizons than is possible with demand observations. These longer records are important when attempting to quantify tail risks of demand, and so can help to inform the design of energy systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad9b3b
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Australian energy demand variability using weather data and machine learning

A. J. Pitman, Gab Abramowitz, Sanaa Hobeichi, Doug Richardson et al.
1 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.21
article

Predicting Australian energy demand variability using weather data and machine learning

A. J. Pitman, Gab Abramowitz, Sanaa Hobeichi, Doug Richardson, Elona Rey-Costa, Lily-belle Sweet
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Managing energy systems requires understanding the variability of energy demand, which on daily timescales is driven primarily by the weather. Historical records of demand typically cover 1–2 decades which may be too short to capture the range of possible demand, particularly for a climate with high interannual variability such as that of Australia. Predicting demand using long records of weather data opens the possibility of more robustly estimating true demand variability. We estimate daily energy demand between 2010 and 2019 for Australian states in the National Electricity Market using machine learning with reanalysis weather variables as predictors. We assess the performance of these models and examine their behaviour to identify which weather variables are most important for predicting demand. We then use the models to estimate demand for the period 1959–2022. We use this 64-year record to quantify how the probability of high demand days can change compared to individual 10-year periods and when conditioned by the phase of the El Ni <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="true">~</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> o Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Energy demand can be accurately predicted with weather, with median errors of 2%–4% on years omitted from the training. We show that the probability of extreme demand over different 10-year periods can vary from half to twice as likely, depending on the decade. When further conditioned on ENSO phase, the probabilities can be up to 7 times higher than when using the 64-year period, implying a risk of overestimating weather-related energy demand if shorter records are used. We conclude that machine learning methods can accurately predict energy demand using only weather data, enabling us to estimate demand variability over longer time horizons than is possible with demand observations. These longer records are important when attempting to quantify tail risks of demand, and so can help to inform the design of energy systems.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(1)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), UNSW Sydney (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (AU), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Climate Extremes, Universities Australia
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.