Thermoelectric properties of type-I and type-II nodal line semimetals: a comparative study
Abstract We investigate the thermoelectric (TE) properties of nodal line semimetals (NLSs) using a combination of semi-analytical calculations within Boltzmann's linear transport theory and the relaxation time approximation along with first-principles calculations for the so-called type-I and type-II NLSs. We consider the conduction and valence bands that cross near the Fermi level of these materials through first-principles calculations of typical type-I (TiS) and type-II (Mg 3 Bi 2 ) NLSs and use the two-band model fit to find the Fermi velocity v F and effective mass m that will be employed as the initial energy dispersion parameters. The optimum curvature value for each energy band is searched by tuning both v F and m to improve the TE properties of the NLSs. By systematically analyzing the calculation results, we observe that tuning v F significantly improves TE properties in both types of NLS compared to tuning m . We also find that in all TE metrics, the type-I NLS surprisingly can surpass the type-II NLS, which seems counter-intuitive to the fact that within the two-band model, the type-I NLS contains a parabolic band while the type-II NLS possesses a higher-order, Mexican-hat band. Our study demonstrates that optimizing the curvature of energy bands by tuning v F can significantly improve the TE performance of NLSs. This approach could guide future efforts in exploring other semimetals as potential TE materials by manipulating their band structures.
Authors
- Muhammad Aziz Majidi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0613-1293)
- Ahmad R. T. Nugraha
- Mohammad Norman Gaza Laksono
Institutions
- University of Indonesia (ID)
- National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (ID)
- Telkom University (ID)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physica Scripta
- Published
- 2024-12-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad9b5a
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.12