Evaluating Eco-Efficiency as a metric for sustainable urban Growth: A comparative study of provincial capital cities in China

• China’s urbanization has had a detrimental impact on the environment and increased resource, energy, and material consumption. • Urban sustainable development is an issue that is often debated in China due to all of these aspects. • Integrating environmental responsibility, green technology, green finance, and clean energy to advance sustainability goals effectively. China’s rapid urbanization has significantly impacted the environment, escalating resource, energy, and material consumption. Sustainable urban development has become a critical issue, with eco-efficiency emerging as a key metric for its assessment. This study employs eco-efficiency analysis, incorporating environmental contamination as an undesirable output, using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and a modified super-efficiency model for ranking cities. Empirical research was conducted on 30 Chinese provincial capital cities using real-world data. Results reveal that while many cities are eco-efficient, inefficiency is concentrated in underdeveloped regions of the southwest and northwest. Conversely, some eco-efficient cities exhibit high levels of pollution and intensive resource use, including land, energy, and water. The modified ranking methodology identified Yinchuan, Lanzhou, and Guiyang as the least eco-efficient cities, while Haikou, Fuzhou, and Beijing ranked as the top performers. The study highlights the need to reform the GDP-oriented development model and evaluation systems, continually upgrade industrial structures, and prevent the migration of heavy industries from more developed to less developed regions. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers to balance urban growth with environmental sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112959
Citations
96
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
108.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Eco-Efficiency as a metric for sustainable urban Growth: A comparative study of provincial capital cities in China

Yegana Hakimova, Muhammad Umair, T. Xu, Weijin Cheng et al.
96 citations
Ecological Indicators
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
108.40
article

Evaluating Eco-Efficiency as a metric for sustainable urban Growth: A comparative study of provincial capital cities in China

Yegana Hakimova, Muhammad Umair, T. Xu, Weijin Cheng, Gang Mang
article en
96 citations

Abstract

• China’s urbanization has had a detrimental impact on the environment and increased resource, energy, and material consumption. • Urban sustainable development is an issue that is often debated in China due to all of these aspects. • Integrating environmental responsibility, green technology, green finance, and clean energy to advance sustainability goals effectively. China’s rapid urbanization has significantly impacted the environment, escalating resource, energy, and material consumption. Sustainable urban development has become a critical issue, with eco-efficiency emerging as a key metric for its assessment. This study employs eco-efficiency analysis, incorporating environmental contamination as an undesirable output, using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and a modified super-efficiency model for ranking cities. Empirical research was conducted on 30 Chinese provincial capital cities using real-world data. Results reveal that while many cities are eco-efficient, inefficiency is concentrated in underdeveloped regions of the southwest and northwest. Conversely, some eco-efficient cities exhibit high levels of pollution and intensive resource use, including land, energy, and water. The modified ranking methodology identified Yinchuan, Lanzhou, and Guiyang as the least eco-efficient cities, while Haikou, Fuzhou, and Beijing ranked as the top performers. The study highlights the need to reform the GDP-oriented development model and evaluation systems, continually upgrade industrial structures, and prevent the migration of heavy industries from more developed to less developed regions. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers to balance urban growth with environmental sustainability.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 169
Wuhan Polytechnic University (CN), Nanjing Normal University (CN), Soochow University (CN), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), Ghazi University (PK), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
108.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.