KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN

This research aims to: 1) analyze and determine the legal certainty strength of private deeds as evidence in resolving civil disputes. 2) understand the legal consequences of using private deeds as evidence based on Article 1874 of the Civil Code. The research employs the normative method, which reviews secondary document studies such as laws and regulations and court decisions involving private deeds as evidence. It is based on the theory of evidence, legal certainty, and expert opinions, which are then analyzed using qualitative methods.The results of the legal analysis on the strength of private deeds as evidence in the District Court of Gorontalo City are as follows: 1) private deeds are considered legitimate evidence, but their evidentiary strength in judicial processes requires the involvement of several parties that must be included in the private deed, namely: a) Both parties involved, b) Authorized officials (Land Deed Officials, Notaries, and Local Government), and c) Witnesses. 2) According to Article 1874 of the Civil Code, all forms of private deeds carry legal consequences in judicial processes. Therefore, to mitigate negative outcomes from using private deeds as evidence, it is necessary to apply the appropriate procedures during their creation to ensure legal certainty in resolving civil cases

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GANEC SWARA
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v18i4.1145
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN

Fence M. Wantu, SRI NANANG MEISKE KAMBA, FATIN FATIN
GANEC SWARA
Legal Studies and Policies
article

KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI AKTA DI BAWAH TANGAN

Fence M. Wantu, SRI NANANG MEISKE KAMBA, FATIN FATIN
article en

Abstract

This research aims to: 1) analyze and determine the legal certainty strength of private deeds as evidence in resolving civil disputes. 2) understand the legal consequences of using private deeds as evidence based on Article 1874 of the Civil Code. The research employs the normative method, which reviews secondary document studies such as laws and regulations and court decisions involving private deeds as evidence. It is based on the theory of evidence, legal certainty, and expert opinions, which are then analyzed using qualitative methods.The results of the legal analysis on the strength of private deeds as evidence in the District Court of Gorontalo City are as follows: 1) private deeds are considered legitimate evidence, but their evidentiary strength in judicial processes requires the involvement of several parties that must be included in the private deed, namely: a) Both parties involved, b) Authorized officials (Land Deed Officials, Notaries, and Local Government), and c) Witnesses. 2) According to Article 1874 of the Civil Code, all forms of private deeds carry legal consequences in judicial processes. Therefore, to mitigate negative outcomes from using private deeds as evidence, it is necessary to apply the appropriate procedures during their creation to ensure legal certainty in resolving civil cases

GANEC SWARAVol. 18(4)
State University of Gorontalo (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.