Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Effect Sizes other than Mean Difference

It is recommended to report both a P value < 0.05 and an effect size exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to assert a meaningful difference or association between two clinical measurements. However, MCIDs for effect sizes other than mean difference has not been established. We aimed to propose study-level MCIDs, based on distribution method and Cohen’s d, for various effect sizes other than the mean difference, such as the hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR), absolute risk difference (ARD), correlation coefficient (r), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Our primary innovation lies in the conversion between Cohen's d and effect sizes and in introducing flexible MCID for effect sizes not on an interval scale. The proposed MCIDs of the HR are 0.64, 0.76, and 0.83 for d = 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2, respectively, along with their reciprocals. For RR, OR, and ARD, d = |inverse_Φ(risk for experiment) – inverse_Φ(risk for control)|, where Φ represents the cumulative distribution function. For correlation coefficient, d = |f(r for experiment) − f(r for control)|, where f(r) = 2·r/√(1 – r^2). For AUC, d = |√2·inverse_Φ(AUC for experiment) − √2·inverse_Φ(AUC for control)|.The proposed MCID is especially useful for evaluating intergroup differences in meta-analyses, where statistical significance is more easily achieved, for setting detectable differences in superiority trials, and for determining non-inferiority margins in non-inferiority trials.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Question
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69854/jcq.2024.0016
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Effect Sizes other than Mean Difference

Tatsukata Kawagoe, Nobuyuki Horita, Yuki Mizuki, Shota Yamamoto et al.
24 citations
Journal of Clinical Question
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
17.02
article

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Effect Sizes other than Mean Difference

Tatsukata Kawagoe, Nobuyuki Horita, Yuki Mizuki, Shota Yamamoto, Tsuneo Yamashiro, Takahiro Mihara
article en
24 citations

Abstract

It is recommended to report both a P value < 0.05 and an effect size exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to assert a meaningful difference or association between two clinical measurements. However, MCIDs for effect sizes other than mean difference has not been established. We aimed to propose study-level MCIDs, based on distribution method and Cohen’s d, for various effect sizes other than the mean difference, such as the hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR), absolute risk difference (ARD), correlation coefficient (r), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Our primary innovation lies in the conversion between Cohen's d and effect sizes and in introducing flexible MCID for effect sizes not on an interval scale. The proposed MCIDs of the HR are 0.64, 0.76, and 0.83 for d = 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2, respectively, along with their reciprocals. For RR, OR, and ARD, d = |inverse_Φ(risk for experiment) – inverse_Φ(risk for control)|, where Φ represents the cumulative distribution function. For correlation coefficient, d = |f(r for experiment) − f(r for control)|, where f(r) = 2·r/√(1 – r^2). For AUC, d = |√2·inverse_Φ(AUC for experiment) − √2·inverse_Φ(AUC for control)|.The proposed MCID is especially useful for evaluating intergroup differences in meta-analyses, where statistical significance is more easily achieved, for setting detectable differences in superiority trials, and for determining non-inferiority margins in non-inferiority trials.

Journal of Clinical QuestionVol. 1(3)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
17.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.