Comparative analysis of the impacts of 30-day perioperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures following multilevel anterior versus posterior cervical fusion
This study suggests that the severity of perioperative complications following anterior or posterior cervical fusion did not predict changes in PROMs or achievement of MCIDs in the anterior or posterior group. Also, PROMs may not fully differentiate the full extent of the impact of perioperative complications following anterior versus posterior cervical fusion. Otherwise, in subsets of patients without complications, anterior compared with posterior patients had improved Neck Disability Index scores at 3 months, with a significant proportion of patients achieving the MCID for the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 3 months.
Authors
- Ruth Saganty
- Gibson J Reine
- Harel Deutsch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8720-8183)
- Jesus R. Varela
- Richard G. Fessler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7432-0950)
- Adewale A. Bakare
- John E. OʼToole (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7802-4948)
- John Stathopoulos
- Vincent C. Traynelis
- Jacob Mazza
- Ricardo B. V. Fontes
Institutions
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.spine24257
- Primary Topic
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00