Expert-assisted statistical learning techniques for assessing wetland conditions in urban landscapes

• Urban wetlands decline rapidly, impacting ecosystem services. • Computer-based tools replace fieldwork for faster, large-scale assessments. • Statistical models reveal subtle changes in wetland conditions. • Hybrid models with human and machine input improve monitoring precision. • Hybrid models outperform single-method assessments. Wetlands are essential components within the socio-ecological framework of urban areas, providing a wide range of ecosystem services. However, increasing natural and anthropogenic stressors place significant pressure on these wetlands, threatening their ability to sustain these vital services. To effectively assess wetland condition and develop appropriate management strategies, robust monitoring tools are needed. Statistical learning techniques, such as machine learning, have been proposed as a promising approach to enhance the development of these wetland monitoring tools. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the pre-existing wetland assessment tool used in the City of Calgary—the Aquatic Condition Index (ACI). We compared ACI performance using three different approaches for selecting indicators: machine-only selection, expert-only selection, and a hybrid approach where humans selected the indicators, but the machine determined the relationships between the indicators and wetland conditions. Our results showed that hybrid approaches, combining human expertise with statistical learning, outperformed both machine-only and expert-only methods. We then examined whether the ACI could be transitioned from field- and computer-based indicators to fully computer-based indicators using the hybrid method of selecting indicators. Our findings revealed comparable results between the two methods, suggesting that a computer-based monitoring system could help overcome the time and budgetary constraints associated with field-based monitoring while also enabling the examination of larger geographical areas. This study underscores the importance of human expertise in guiding the statistical learning process, particularly in the selection of indicators that accurately represent wetland processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112932
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert-assisted statistical learning techniques for assessing wetland conditions in urban landscapes

Sassan Mohammady, K E Sanderson, Felix Nwaishi, Irena F. Creed et al.
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Expert-assisted statistical learning techniques for assessing wetland conditions in urban landscapes

Sassan Mohammady, K E Sanderson, Felix Nwaishi, Irena F. Creed, Tracy S. Lee, Vanessa A. Carney, Kevin J. Erratt, Caroline L. Lesage
article en

Abstract

• Urban wetlands decline rapidly, impacting ecosystem services. • Computer-based tools replace fieldwork for faster, large-scale assessments. • Statistical models reveal subtle changes in wetland conditions. • Hybrid models with human and machine input improve monitoring precision. • Hybrid models outperform single-method assessments. Wetlands are essential components within the socio-ecological framework of urban areas, providing a wide range of ecosystem services. However, increasing natural and anthropogenic stressors place significant pressure on these wetlands, threatening their ability to sustain these vital services. To effectively assess wetland condition and develop appropriate management strategies, robust monitoring tools are needed. Statistical learning techniques, such as machine learning, have been proposed as a promising approach to enhance the development of these wetland monitoring tools. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the pre-existing wetland assessment tool used in the City of Calgary—the Aquatic Condition Index (ACI). We compared ACI performance using three different approaches for selecting indicators: machine-only selection, expert-only selection, and a hybrid approach where humans selected the indicators, but the machine determined the relationships between the indicators and wetland conditions. Our results showed that hybrid approaches, combining human expertise with statistical learning, outperformed both machine-only and expert-only methods. We then examined whether the ACI could be transitioned from field- and computer-based indicators to fully computer-based indicators using the hybrid method of selecting indicators. Our findings revealed comparable results between the two methods, suggesting that a computer-based monitoring system could help overcome the time and budgetary constraints associated with field-based monitoring while also enabling the examination of larger geographical areas. This study underscores the importance of human expertise in guiding the statistical learning process, particularly in the selection of indicators that accurately represent wetland processes.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 169
University of Toronto (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Concordia University (CA), Mount Royal University (CA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.