Understanding age-related differences in online prosocial behavior: A qualitative thematic analysis of interpersonal, ideological, and mixed patterns

Prosocial behaviors (PB), referring to voluntary acts intended to benefit others, have become increasingly prevalent online due to advancements in internet and technology, providing opportunities to benefit people globally. Moreover, previous research suggests that age is a crucial determinant of PB, although the findings are mixed. This study explored the types of online prosocial behaviors (OPB) preferred by different age groups among a sample of 31 Hong Kong Chinese aged 20-70. The participants included a roughly equal number of females and males, recruited through social media platforms. Participants engaged in four focus group discussions, sharing their experiences and thoughts on OPB. The thematic analysis was guided by a recently developed classification of prosociality, distinguishing between interpersonal prosociality (direct PB with immediate feedback) and ideological prosociality (indirect benefits towards collectives without immediate outcomes). Inductive codes that could not be allocated to either type were grouped as a new theme. Three themes emerged: (i) interpersonal OPB (e.g., helping others online for specific goals), (ii) ideological OPB (e.g., concern about injustice and environmental issues), and (iii) mixed OPB (e.g., saving animals, updating COVID-19 information). We found that attention to interpersonal prosociality was highest among older adults (aged 60+), while younger adults (aged 18-29) exhibited greater concern for ideological OPB compared to their older counterparts. Our findings contribute to the conceptual framework of prosociality and underscore the importance of age-related factors in future quantitative research on OPB and on the design of online charity campaigns. • Qualitative focus groups on age differences in online prosocial behaviors (OPB). • Three OPB themes identified: Interpersonal, ideological, and mixed. • Interpersonal OPB was the most common online prosocial behavior. • Discussing interpersonal OPB was highest among the older adult group. • The younger adult group engaged in ideological OPB more than the other age groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2024-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100557
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding age-related differences in online prosocial behavior: A qualitative thematic analysis of interpersonal, ideological, and mixed patterns

Algae K. Y. Au, John B. Nezlek, Sheung‐Tak Cheng, David Shum et al.
1 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
1.13
article

Understanding age-related differences in online prosocial behavior: A qualitative thematic analysis of interpersonal, ideological, and mixed patterns

Algae K. Y. Au, John B. Nezlek, Sheung‐Tak Cheng, David Shum, Wesley Wu, Bryant P. H. Hui
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Prosocial behaviors (PB), referring to voluntary acts intended to benefit others, have become increasingly prevalent online due to advancements in internet and technology, providing opportunities to benefit people globally. Moreover, previous research suggests that age is a crucial determinant of PB, although the findings are mixed. This study explored the types of online prosocial behaviors (OPB) preferred by different age groups among a sample of 31 Hong Kong Chinese aged 20-70. The participants included a roughly equal number of females and males, recruited through social media platforms. Participants engaged in four focus group discussions, sharing their experiences and thoughts on OPB. The thematic analysis was guided by a recently developed classification of prosociality, distinguishing between interpersonal prosociality (direct PB with immediate feedback) and ideological prosociality (indirect benefits towards collectives without immediate outcomes). Inductive codes that could not be allocated to either type were grouped as a new theme. Three themes emerged: (i) interpersonal OPB (e.g., helping others online for specific goals), (ii) ideological OPB (e.g., concern about injustice and environmental issues), and (iii) mixed OPB (e.g., saving animals, updating COVID-19 information). We found that attention to interpersonal prosociality was highest among older adults (aged 60+), while younger adults (aged 18-29) exhibited greater concern for ideological OPB compared to their older counterparts. Our findings contribute to the conceptual framework of prosociality and underscore the importance of age-related factors in future quantitative research on OPB and on the design of online charity campaigns. • Qualitative focus groups on age differences in online prosocial behaviors (OPB). • Three OPB themes identified: Interpersonal, ideological, and mixed. • Interpersonal OPB was the most common online prosocial behavior. • Discussing interpersonal OPB was highest among the older adult group. • The younger adult group engaged in ideological OPB more than the other age groups.

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 17
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), William & Mary (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Williams (United States) (US), Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
University Grants Committee, Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.