Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates

Background: Angle fractures represent the highest percentage of mandibular fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two miniplates fixation versus one plate fixation in the treatment of angle fractures. Material and Methods: The present study was carried out on 40 patients with fractures of the mandible angle region treated by open reduction and internal fixation with 2.0mm standard conventional mini plates. Subjects were selected and randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups, 20 patients for each. Group I, patients were treated by single miniplate at superior border of mandible by intraoral approach; Group II, patients were treated by one miniplate like in group I, plus another plate at the lateral aspect of angle, trans buccally by trocar and cannula. The patients were evaluated for duration of surgery, post operative infection, wound healing, neurosensory disturbance, occlusion, malunion, and hardware failure. Results: The complications were more in group 2 than in group 1. Disturbed occlusion was noted in 2 patients in group 2 and 3 patients of group 1. Infection occurred in 1 patient in group 1 and 2 patients in group 2. Preoperative/postoperative anesthesia was reported in 4/6 patients in group 1 and 5/7 patients of group2. No wound breakdown was seen in both groups. Screw loosening, necessitates removal of the plate, was noted in 3 patients of group 1 and one patient of group 2. Two patients’ group 1 showed delayed union and none of the patients in group 2 develop such complication. The difference in the complications between the two groups was not significant. Conclusions: There was no difference between the single- and double plate fixation regarding disturbed occlusion, infection, wound break down, lip paresthesia, hardware failure and malunion. Keywords: Angle Fractures, Double plate, Mandible fracture, Miniplate, Single plate, Trans buccal approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erbil Dental Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2024.20
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates

Mustafa Rasul Muhammed
Erbil Dental Journal
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates

Mustafa Rasul Muhammed
article en

Abstract

Background: Angle fractures represent the highest percentage of mandibular fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two miniplates fixation versus one plate fixation in the treatment of angle fractures. Material and Methods: The present study was carried out on 40 patients with fractures of the mandible angle region treated by open reduction and internal fixation with 2.0mm standard conventional mini plates. Subjects were selected and randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups, 20 patients for each. Group I, patients were treated by single miniplate at superior border of mandible by intraoral approach; Group II, patients were treated by one miniplate like in group I, plus another plate at the lateral aspect of angle, trans buccally by trocar and cannula. The patients were evaluated for duration of surgery, post operative infection, wound healing, neurosensory disturbance, occlusion, malunion, and hardware failure. Results: The complications were more in group 2 than in group 1. Disturbed occlusion was noted in 2 patients in group 2 and 3 patients of group 1. Infection occurred in 1 patient in group 1 and 2 patients in group 2. Preoperative/postoperative anesthesia was reported in 4/6 patients in group 1 and 5/7 patients of group2. No wound breakdown was seen in both groups. Screw loosening, necessitates removal of the plate, was noted in 3 patients of group 1 and one patient of group 2. Two patients’ group 1 showed delayed union and none of the patients in group 2 develop such complication. The difference in the complications between the two groups was not significant. Conclusions: There was no difference between the single- and double plate fixation regarding disturbed occlusion, infection, wound break down, lip paresthesia, hardware failure and malunion. Keywords: Angle Fractures, Double plate, Mandible fracture, Miniplate, Single plate, Trans buccal approach.

Erbil Dental JournalVol. 7(2)
Hawler Medical University (IQ), Sulaimani Polytechnic University (IQ), University of Kurdistan Hewler (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical Outcomes of Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated by Single-Versus Double Miniplates — Mustafa Rasul Muhammed · Erbil Dental Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS