A comparison of postoperative microbiological and histological test results with the indication for revision as listed at the time of surgery in the National Joint Registry: a single-centre cohort study of metal-on-metal total hip replacement and hip
We observed that the results of histology and microbiology analyses of intraoperative samples may provide evidence to support alternative diagnoses in 20% of cases. This indicates a need for a change in the work-up of these cases to allow a more accurate prediction of the indication for revision. Alternatively, if there was evidence of a difference in outcome for patients where the indication may be changed when such data becomes available, the feasibility of a facility to add additional information from samples taken intraoperatively when it becomes available should be explored.
Authors
- Gulraj S. Matharu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1098-9230)
- Rajpal Nandra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7525-5927)
- Thomas A Murphy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-0742)
- Michael Richard Whitehouse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-9024)
- Fiona Berryman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2317-2046)
- David J. Dunlop (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-7036)
Institutions
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Southmead Hospital (GB)
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hip International
- Published
- 2024-12-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000241286791
- Primary Topic
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00