Trade‐in program options in a retailer‐led supply chain

Abstract Firms offer trade‐in programs that consumers trade an old product and receive trade‐in rebate when buying a new one. To study whether the manufacturer or the retailer should introduce a trade‐in program, we build a Stackelberg game that consists of one manufacturer and one retailer by considering old and new consumers in a retailer‐led supply chain. We find that when the production cost of a product is high under no trade‐in program, old consumers do not purchase the product. When the retailer provides the trade‐in program, there are “lose–win” situation for the manufacturer and retailer. However, when the manufacturer provides the trade‐in program, there are “win–win” situation for the manufacturer and retailer. Then, we find that the manufacturer (retailer) can benefit more from providing trade‐in program by themselves than that provided by the other one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Transactions in Operational Research
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13574
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade‐in program options in a retailer‐led supply chain

Lu Zhang, Yi Xia, Wenyu Zhao, Xiaojun Fan
7 citations
International Transactions in Operational Research
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
3.70
article

Trade‐in program options in a retailer‐led supply chain

Lu Zhang, Yi Xia, Wenyu Zhao, Xiaojun Fan
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Firms offer trade‐in programs that consumers trade an old product and receive trade‐in rebate when buying a new one. To study whether the manufacturer or the retailer should introduce a trade‐in program, we build a Stackelberg game that consists of one manufacturer and one retailer by considering old and new consumers in a retailer‐led supply chain. We find that when the production cost of a product is high under no trade‐in program, old consumers do not purchase the product. When the retailer provides the trade‐in program, there are “lose–win” situation for the manufacturer and retailer. However, when the manufacturer provides the trade‐in program, there are “win–win” situation for the manufacturer and retailer. Then, we find that the manufacturer (retailer) can benefit more from providing trade‐in program by themselves than that provided by the other one.

International Transactions in Operational ResearchVol. 33(3)
Shanghai University (CN), Xi'an University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
3.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.