How Good Is GPT’s “Emojinal Intelligence”? Investigating Emoji Patterns in LLM-Generated Social Media Text

Recent advancement in Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened the prospect of generating text for social media content that mimics human writing. The misuse of these tools presents urgent dilemmas, motivating the need to better understand the structure and patterns of LLM-generated content. Human communication on the Internet has developed relevant linguistic adaptations, including the use of emoji to augment traditional text. This study investigates the ability of one LLM, OpenAI’s GPT-3.5, to replicate human emoji usage in social media contexts. Drawing upon a dataset of nearly three thousand US English human-written tweets, we employed GPT-3.5-Turbo to generate social-media-style content and analyzed the use of emoji in the resulting text. We compared the patterns of emoji usage between the LLM-generated and the human-written datasets, particularly frequency, types of emoji commonly used, and emoji sequences (n-grams). Our results revealed notable differences in all categories. While human-written tweets were more likely to use faces, hearts, and repetitive sequences of emoji, LLM-created content had a broader variety of emoji, with a preference for literal representations of the text’s subject matter, producing diverse and unique emoji combinations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research.
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.3225
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Good Is GPT’s “Emojinal Intelligence”? Investigating Emoji Patterns in LLM-Generated Social Media Text

Kenneth M. Hopkinson, Michael Dunn
1 citations
Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research.
Digital Communication and Language
0.37
article

How Good Is GPT’s “Emojinal Intelligence”? Investigating Emoji Patterns in LLM-Generated Social Media Text

Kenneth M. Hopkinson, Michael Dunn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent advancement in Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened the prospect of generating text for social media content that mimics human writing. The misuse of these tools presents urgent dilemmas, motivating the need to better understand the structure and patterns of LLM-generated content. Human communication on the Internet has developed relevant linguistic adaptations, including the use of emoji to augment traditional text. This study investigates the ability of one LLM, OpenAI’s GPT-3.5, to replicate human emoji usage in social media contexts. Drawing upon a dataset of nearly three thousand US English human-written tweets, we employed GPT-3.5-Turbo to generate social-media-style content and analyzed the use of emoji in the resulting text. We compared the patterns of emoji usage between the LLM-generated and the human-written datasets, particularly frequency, types of emoji commonly used, and emoji sequences (n-grams). Our results revealed notable differences in all categories. While human-written tweets were more likely to use faces, hearts, and repetitive sequences of emoji, LLM-created content had a broader variety of emoji, with a preference for literal representations of the text’s subject matter, producing diverse and unique emoji combinations.

Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research.Vol. 4(1)
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (US), U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Digital Communication and Language
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Good Is GPT’s “Emojinal Intelligence”? Investigating Emoji Patterns in LLM-Generated Social Media Text — Kenneth M. Hopkinson, Michael Dunn · Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS