Leading while female: Analyzing women CEOs’ post‐appointment trajectory

Abstract Objective Women leaders continue to be in the minority as corporate CEOs. Despite efforts to highlight the benefits of leadership diversity, fewer than 10 percent of CEO positions within U.S. public corporations are held by women. This study draws on the theory of gendered organizations and token theory to explore challenges women CEOs face that may inhibit their leadership trajectories and contribute to the dearth of women CEOs. We build upon and extend recent research on the leadership trajectory of women CEOs post‐appointment. Methods We test whether women CEOs have shorter tenures and heightened vulnerability to dismissal relative to men CEOs, and whether women's risk of dismissal is exacerbated by the glass cliff. Our data draw from a large sample of firms in the Russell 3000 index from 2016 to 2022. Results We find that compared to men CEOs, women enjoy shorter tenures and face a higher likelihood of being dismissed involuntarily. This gender gap in dismissal risk is further exacerbated when women are appointed during times of weak organizational performance (i.e., the “glass cliff”). Conclusion We discuss the implications of our findings for theory and practice on gender inequality in organizations and research on the glass cliff.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13473
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leading while female: Analyzing women CEOs’ post‐appointment trajectory

Alison Cook, Christy Glass, Alicia R. Ingersoll
3 citations
Social Science Quarterly
Gender Diversity and Inequality
2.79
article

Leading while female: Analyzing women CEOs’ post‐appointment trajectory

Alison Cook, Christy Glass, Alicia R. Ingersoll
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective Women leaders continue to be in the minority as corporate CEOs. Despite efforts to highlight the benefits of leadership diversity, fewer than 10 percent of CEO positions within U.S. public corporations are held by women. This study draws on the theory of gendered organizations and token theory to explore challenges women CEOs face that may inhibit their leadership trajectories and contribute to the dearth of women CEOs. We build upon and extend recent research on the leadership trajectory of women CEOs post‐appointment. Methods We test whether women CEOs have shorter tenures and heightened vulnerability to dismissal relative to men CEOs, and whether women's risk of dismissal is exacerbated by the glass cliff. Our data draw from a large sample of firms in the Russell 3000 index from 2016 to 2022. Results We find that compared to men CEOs, women enjoy shorter tenures and face a higher likelihood of being dismissed involuntarily. This gender gap in dismissal risk is further exacerbated when women are appointed during times of weak organizational performance (i.e., the “glass cliff”). Conclusion We discuss the implications of our findings for theory and practice on gender inequality in organizations and research on the glass cliff.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 105(7)
Weber State University (US), Utah State University (US), Huntsman (United States) (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leading while female: Analyzing women CEOs’ post‐appointment trajectory — Alison Cook, Christy Glass, et al. · Social Science Quarterly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS