The next generation of AI tools are coming, do we need to better regulate them?

This research investigates the importance for robust regulation and legislation to properly govern the development of ‘Frontier Artificial Intelligence Systems’. To do this a comparison of approaches of both existing and proposed legislation has been taken which includes from the US, UK and EU. This has involved reading both summations, assessments and opinions from both academic writers and the media and making comparisons with other industry regulations issues such as Social Media. The key findings of this research highlight the different approaches being taken to the same problem. Legislation that came into force on August the 1st 2024 from the EU takes a safety-first approach, identifying risk levels from ‘unacceptable risk’ that would be prohibited, down to ‘minimal risk’ which would remain unregulated. This is compared to the UK White Paper, which advocated an innovation first approach with a secondary focus on safety. With the potential risks associated with AI enhanced cyber-attacks and the spread of disinformation across different platforms, this research emphasises the importance of strong regulation in relation to safety and ensuring this happens from the outset in the development of ‘Frontier AI’ and is not an afterthought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research.
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.3033
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The next generation of AI tools are coming, do we need to better regulate them?

Michael Aubrey
Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research.
Legal and Policy Issues
article

The next generation of AI tools are coming, do we need to better regulate them?

Michael Aubrey
article en

Abstract

This research investigates the importance for robust regulation and legislation to properly govern the development of ‘Frontier Artificial Intelligence Systems’. To do this a comparison of approaches of both existing and proposed legislation has been taken which includes from the US, UK and EU. This has involved reading both summations, assessments and opinions from both academic writers and the media and making comparisons with other industry regulations issues such as Social Media. The key findings of this research highlight the different approaches being taken to the same problem. Legislation that came into force on August the 1st 2024 from the EU takes a safety-first approach, identifying risk levels from ‘unacceptable risk’ that would be prohibited, down to ‘minimal risk’ which would remain unregulated. This is compared to the UK White Paper, which advocated an innovation first approach with a secondary focus on safety. With the potential risks associated with AI enhanced cyber-attacks and the spread of disinformation across different platforms, this research emphasises the importance of strong regulation in relation to safety and ensuring this happens from the outset in the development of ‘Frontier AI’ and is not an afterthought.

Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research.Vol. 4(1)
University of South Wales (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.