Evaluation of the Abrasive Effect of Different Types of Toothbrushes on Enamel Surface: An In Vitro Study

Aim:The aim of the current study was to assess the abrasive effect of three different types of toothbrushes on enamel surfaces.Materials and methods: Sixty recently extracted mandibular premolar teeth for orthodontic reasons were randomly divided into three groups-group I: the samples brushed with a manual toothbrush, group II: the samples brushed with a multidirectional-powered toothbrush, and group III: the samples brushed with a sonic-powered toothbrush.A specially designed brushing apparatus was developed.The tension of the spring was adjusted to 90 10 gm using a dontrix gauge.For 2 weeks, a single sample was brushed twice a day for 2 minutes each time.A profilometer was used to assess the mean surface loss.Roughness average (Ra) values were computed before brushing and after 2 weeks of brushing, and they were then statistically evaluated.Results: The maximum surface roughness was found in group I (22.38 1.86), followed by group III (19.04 2.32), and least in group II (17.14 1.20).There was a statistically significant difference found between group I vs group II and group I vs group III, with a mean difference of 5.24 and 3.34, respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between group II vs group III. Conclusion:In conclusion, surface roughness was noticed in all toothbrushes that were utilized in the present investigation.However, when compared to the manual and sonic-powered toothbrush groups, the multidirectional-powered toothbrush group had the least amount of surface roughness.Clinical significance: The three most common conditions affecting the oral cavity are gingivitis, periodontal disease, and dental caries.The primary cause of these dental conditions is plaque.For the preservation of dental and oral health, plaque reduction is crucial.One very common tool for controlling plaque is the toothbrush.There are numerous toothbrushes on the market that are designed to remove plaque.Toothbrushes are a major factor in the development of tooth wear because they create abrasion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Dentistry
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2443
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Abrasive Effect of Different Types of Toothbrushes on Enamel Surface: An In Vitro Study

Ibrahim Saleh Aljulayfi, Joseph Sebastian, Upasana Reddy, Monalisa Swain et al.
1 citations
World Journal of Dentistry
Dental Erosion and Treatment
0.40
article

Evaluation of the Abrasive Effect of Different Types of Toothbrushes on Enamel Surface: An In Vitro Study

Ibrahim Saleh Aljulayfi, Joseph Sebastian, Upasana Reddy, Monalisa Swain, Sandhya Chavan, Mohammad Jalaluddin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim:The aim of the current study was to assess the abrasive effect of three different types of toothbrushes on enamel surfaces.Materials and methods: Sixty recently extracted mandibular premolar teeth for orthodontic reasons were randomly divided into three groups-group I: the samples brushed with a manual toothbrush, group II: the samples brushed with a multidirectional-powered toothbrush, and group III: the samples brushed with a sonic-powered toothbrush.A specially designed brushing apparatus was developed.The tension of the spring was adjusted to 90 10 gm using a dontrix gauge.For 2 weeks, a single sample was brushed twice a day for 2 minutes each time.A profilometer was used to assess the mean surface loss.Roughness average (Ra) values were computed before brushing and after 2 weeks of brushing, and they were then statistically evaluated.Results: The maximum surface roughness was found in group I (22.38 1.86), followed by group III (19.04 2.32), and least in group II (17.14 1.20).There was a statistically significant difference found between group I vs group II and group I vs group III, with a mean difference of 5.24 and 3.34, respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between group II vs group III. Conclusion:In conclusion, surface roughness was noticed in all toothbrushes that were utilized in the present investigation.However, when compared to the manual and sonic-powered toothbrush groups, the multidirectional-powered toothbrush group had the least amount of surface roughness.Clinical significance: The three most common conditions affecting the oral cavity are gingivitis, periodontal disease, and dental caries.The primary cause of these dental conditions is plaque.For the preservation of dental and oral health, plaque reduction is crucial.One very common tool for controlling plaque is the toothbrush.There are numerous toothbrushes on the market that are designed to remove plaque.Toothbrushes are a major factor in the development of tooth wear because they create abrasion.

World Journal of DentistryVol. 15(8)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.