Discreción de juicio y libertad interna a propósito de la sentencia rotal «coram» Salvatori, de 15 de marzo de 2023

The author reflects in general terms on two circumstances relating to the case at hand: online infatuation and intense courtship; before analyzing the scope of the ‘American’ way of acting in the court of first instance, which has been criticized on several occasions in Rota judgements, due to the lack of evidence – in particular, expert evidence – which such a case requires. The central section of the paper comprises a theoretical and practical study of lack of internal freedom as a serious defect in discretion of judgment, based on Rota jurisprudence; and rules out the conclusion that it constitutes an autonomous cause of nullity, a position that lacks legal grounding and lends itself to irregularities and abuse. The author praises the sentence for its commitment to the truth and corroborates its decision regarding validity given the insufficiency of the evidence presented, including the expertise requested ex officio by the Roman Rota.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ius Canonicum
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15581/016.128.008
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discreción de juicio y libertad interna a propósito de la sentencia rotal «coram» Salvatori, de 15 de marzo de 2023

Javier Ferrer-Ortiz
Ius Canonicum
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

Discreción de juicio y libertad interna a propósito de la sentencia rotal «coram» Salvatori, de 15 de marzo de 2023

Javier Ferrer-Ortiz
article en

Abstract

The author reflects in general terms on two circumstances relating to the case at hand: online infatuation and intense courtship; before analyzing the scope of the ‘American’ way of acting in the court of first instance, which has been criticized on several occasions in Rota judgements, due to the lack of evidence – in particular, expert evidence – which such a case requires. The central section of the paper comprises a theoretical and practical study of lack of internal freedom as a serious defect in discretion of judgment, based on Rota jurisprudence; and rules out the conclusion that it constitutes an autonomous cause of nullity, a position that lacks legal grounding and lends itself to irregularities and abuse. The author praises the sentence for its commitment to the truth and corroborates its decision regarding validity given the insufficiency of the evidence presented, including the expertise requested ex officio by the Roman Rota.

Ius CanonicumVol. 64(128)
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.