Hierarchical vs. horizontal political translation in post-15M Spain

The political and cultural atmosphere that emerged in Spain after the 15M movement was decisively shaped by translation practices, as evident in the high number of translations released by politically committed publishers, the visibility and status of translated intellectuals—such as Silvia Federici and David Harvey—, and the adoption of political concepts such as comunes and cuidados that have been shaped through complex processes of translation. Translation has also been used as a political concept by left-wing activists and political representatives, notably Podemos and other political groups. In this context, this article distinguishes between acts of hierarchical and horizontal political translation. Both proceed from a similar point of departure: the language of mainstream politics and the language of the majority of society are so profoundly disconnected that any meaningful interaction between them has to rely on practices of translation. Each of these practices involves a very different conception of politics, particularly at an epistemological level: while hierarchical translation deploys a more refined version of the traditional model of expertise, horizontal translation seems to favor a more egalitarian understanding of knowledge. A synopsis of this article can be found here.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Encounters in translation.
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35562/encounters-in-translation.522
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchical vs. horizontal political translation in post-15M Spain

Fruela Fernández
Encounters in translation.
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Hierarchical vs. horizontal political translation in post-15M Spain

Fruela Fernández
article en

Abstract

The political and cultural atmosphere that emerged in Spain after the 15M movement was decisively shaped by translation practices, as evident in the high number of translations released by politically committed publishers, the visibility and status of translated intellectuals—such as Silvia Federici and David Harvey—, and the adoption of political concepts such as comunes and cuidados that have been shaped through complex processes of translation. Translation has also been used as a political concept by left-wing activists and political representatives, notably Podemos and other political groups. In this context, this article distinguishes between acts of hierarchical and horizontal political translation. Both proceed from a similar point of departure: the language of mainstream politics and the language of the majority of society are so profoundly disconnected that any meaningful interaction between them has to rely on practices of translation. Each of these practices involves a very different conception of politics, particularly at an epistemological level: while hierarchical translation deploys a more refined version of the traditional model of expertise, horizontal translation seems to favor a more egalitarian understanding of knowledge. A synopsis of this article can be found here.

Encounters in translation.(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hierarchical vs. horizontal political translation in post-15M Spain — Fruela Fernández · Encounters in translation. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS