Ethical Behaviour in Search and Rescue: A Scale Development Research

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a measurement tool with proven validity and reliability to measure ethical behavior in search and rescue. Materials and Method: Exploratory sequential mixed method was preferred in the study. The first stage started with a qualitative study to create the item pool. Interviews with 16 search and rescue personnel were conducted through semi-structured forms. 38 items were created. The content validity of the item pool was evaluated with expert opinion. Lawshe technique was used to evaluate expert responses. Then, the item pool, which was subjected to language and spelling control, was piloted with 10 participants. After necessary adjustments were made, the draft scale was administered to 330 personnel. Results: As a result of the analysis, the scale showed a unidimensional structure consisting of 10 items. The obtained scale was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale of ethical behavior in search and rescue was evaluated by Cronbach's Alpha and it was determined that the scale had high reliability and internal consistency with .95. Conclusion: The developed “Ethical Behavior in Search and Rescue Scale” can be applied to all individuals operating in the field of search and rescue. Keywords: Search and rescue, Ethics, Mixed Method, Scale, Scale development

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1544331
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Behaviour in Search and Rescue: A Scale Development Research

Emrah Gökkaya, Ömer DEMİRBİLEK
Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Ethical Behaviour in Search and Rescue: A Scale Development Research

Emrah Gökkaya, Ömer DEMİRBİLEK
article en

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a measurement tool with proven validity and reliability to measure ethical behavior in search and rescue. Materials and Method: Exploratory sequential mixed method was preferred in the study. The first stage started with a qualitative study to create the item pool. Interviews with 16 search and rescue personnel were conducted through semi-structured forms. 38 items were created. The content validity of the item pool was evaluated with expert opinion. Lawshe technique was used to evaluate expert responses. Then, the item pool, which was subjected to language and spelling control, was piloted with 10 participants. After necessary adjustments were made, the draft scale was administered to 330 personnel. Results: As a result of the analysis, the scale showed a unidimensional structure consisting of 10 items. The obtained scale was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale of ethical behavior in search and rescue was evaluated by Cronbach's Alpha and it was determined that the scale had high reliability and internal consistency with .95. Conclusion: The developed “Ethical Behavior in Search and Rescue Scale” can be applied to all individuals operating in the field of search and rescue. Keywords: Search and rescue, Ethics, Mixed Method, Scale, Scale development

Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal
Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi (TR), Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Kayseri Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.