What drives the success and failure of climate change adaptation projects? A qualitative comparative analysis

The ongoing climate crisis is significantly impacting the livelihoods of millions of farmers worldwide. Despite various efforts, many climate adaptation projects have struggled to yield the desired results. What determines the success or failure of these projects? Utilizing Qualitative Comparative Analysis, we delve into the intricate connections among climate patterns, resilience, and adaptation initiatives. Through a case study of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) program, we aim to discern critical factors contributing to success or failure. Our findings underscore the importance of integrating climate trends into adaptation strategies, which fosters a deeper comprehension of climate-related risks and bolsters the resilience of smallholder farmers. Notably, no single factor can solely account for success; rather, it is the combined presence or synergy of multiple factors that drive effective adaptation interventions. Key elements include adept project management, improved institutional coordination, scalability of interventions, bolstering beneficiaries’ coping mechanisms, and fostering innovation. It is the harmonious interplay of these components that paves the way for successful outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10186-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What drives the success and failure of climate change adaptation projects? A qualitative comparative analysis

N. K. Nguyen, Romina Cavatassi, Ekaterina Paustyan, Margarita Astralaga et al.
3 citations
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
3.40
article

What drives the success and failure of climate change adaptation projects? A qualitative comparative analysis

N. K. Nguyen, Romina Cavatassi, Ekaterina Paustyan, Margarita Astralaga, Peter Läderach, Grazia Pacillo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The ongoing climate crisis is significantly impacting the livelihoods of millions of farmers worldwide. Despite various efforts, many climate adaptation projects have struggled to yield the desired results. What determines the success or failure of these projects? Utilizing Qualitative Comparative Analysis, we delve into the intricate connections among climate patterns, resilience, and adaptation initiatives. Through a case study of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) program, we aim to discern critical factors contributing to success or failure. Our findings underscore the importance of integrating climate trends into adaptation strategies, which fosters a deeper comprehension of climate-related risks and bolsters the resilience of smallholder farmers. Notably, no single factor can solely account for success; rather, it is the combined presence or synergy of multiple factors that drive effective adaptation interventions. Key elements include adept project management, improved institutional coordination, scalability of interventions, bolstering beneficiaries’ coping mechanisms, and fostering innovation. It is the harmonious interplay of these components that paves the way for successful outcomes.

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global ChangeVol. 29(8)
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IT), King's College - North Carolina (US), King's College London (GB), Creative Commons (US), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers, International Fund for Agricultural Development
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.