Synchronized Contrast-Enhanced 4DCT Simulation for Target Volume Delineation in Abdominal SBRT

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> To present the technical aspects of contrast-enhanced 4DCT (ce4DCT) simulation for abdominal SBRT. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-two patients underwent two sequential 4DCT scans: one baseline and one contrast-enhanced with personalized delay time (<i>t<sub>delay</sub></i>) calculated to capture the tumor in the desired contrast phase, based on diagnostic triple-phase CT. The internal target volume (ITV) was delineated on ten contrast phases, and a panel of three experts qualitatively evaluated tumor visibility. Aortic HU values were measured to refine the <i>t<sub>delay</sub></i> for subsequent patients. The commonly used approach of combining triple-phase CT with unenhanced 4DCT was simulated, and differences in target delineation were evaluated by volume, centroid shift, Dice and Jaccard indices, and mean distance agreement (MDA). The margins required to account for motion were calculated. <b>Results:</b> The ce4DCT acquisitions substantially improved tumor visibility over the entire breathing cycle in 20 patients, according to the experts' unanimous evaluation. The median contrast peak time was 54.5 s, and the washout plateau was observed at 70.3 s, with mean peak and plateau HU values of 292 ± 59 and 169 ± 25. The volumes from the commonly used procedure (ITV2) were significantly smaller than the ce4DCT volumes (ITV1) (<i>p</i> = 0.045). The median centroid shift was 4.7 mm. The ITV1-ITV2 overlap was 69% (Dice index), 53% (Jaccard index), and 2.89 mm (MDA), with the liver volumes showing significantly lower indices compared to the pancreatic volumes (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.011). The margins required to better encompass ITV1 were highly variable, with mean values ≥ 4 mm in all directions except for the left-right axis. <b>Conclusions:</b> The ce4DCT simulation was feasible, resulting in optimal tumor enhancement with minimal resource investment, while significantly mitigating uncertainties in SBRT planning by addressing poor visibility and respiratory motion. Triple-phase 3DCT with unenhanced 4DCT led to high variability in target delineation, making the isotropic margins ineffective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234066
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synchronized Contrast-Enhanced 4DCT Simulation for Target Volume Delineation in Abdominal SBRT

G. S. Rossano, Luisa De Sanctis, Riccardo Ray Colciago, R.M. Niespolo et al.
3 citations
Cancers
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
1.21
article

Synchronized Contrast-Enhanced 4DCT Simulation for Target Volume Delineation in Abdominal SBRT

G. S. Rossano, Luisa De Sanctis, Riccardo Ray Colciago, R.M. Niespolo, Valeria Faccenda, Davide Ippolito, Elena De Ponti, Davide Gandola, Stefano Arcangeli, Denis Panizza
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> To present the technical aspects of contrast-enhanced 4DCT (ce4DCT) simulation for abdominal SBRT. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-two patients underwent two sequential 4DCT scans: one baseline and one contrast-enhanced with personalized delay time (<i>t<sub>delay</sub></i>) calculated to capture the tumor in the desired contrast phase, based on diagnostic triple-phase CT. The internal target volume (ITV) was delineated on ten contrast phases, and a panel of three experts qualitatively evaluated tumor visibility. Aortic HU values were measured to refine the <i>t<sub>delay</sub></i> for subsequent patients. The commonly used approach of combining triple-phase CT with unenhanced 4DCT was simulated, and differences in target delineation were evaluated by volume, centroid shift, Dice and Jaccard indices, and mean distance agreement (MDA). The margins required to account for motion were calculated. <b>Results:</b> The ce4DCT acquisitions substantially improved tumor visibility over the entire breathing cycle in 20 patients, according to the experts' unanimous evaluation. The median contrast peak time was 54.5 s, and the washout plateau was observed at 70.3 s, with mean peak and plateau HU values of 292 ± 59 and 169 ± 25. The volumes from the commonly used procedure (ITV2) were significantly smaller than the ce4DCT volumes (ITV1) (<i>p</i> = 0.045). The median centroid shift was 4.7 mm. The ITV1-ITV2 overlap was 69% (Dice index), 53% (Jaccard index), and 2.89 mm (MDA), with the liver volumes showing significantly lower indices compared to the pancreatic volumes (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.011). The margins required to better encompass ITV1 were highly variable, with mean values ≥ 4 mm in all directions except for the left-right axis. <b>Conclusions:</b> The ce4DCT simulation was feasible, resulting in optimal tumor enhancement with minimal resource investment, while significantly mitigating uncertainties in SBRT planning by addressing poor visibility and respiratory motion. Triple-phase 3DCT with unenhanced 4DCT led to high variability in target delineation, making the isotropic margins ineffective.

CancersVol. 16(23)
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.