HISTORIOGRAPHY AND SOURCE STUDY OF JADIDISM IN DAGESTAN

A review of the historiography of the development of Jadidism and Muslim reformism in the Volga region, Central Asia, Transcaucasia and the study of Arabographic sources on the North-Eastern Caucasus allowed us to agree with the conclusion of a number of Western scholars who spoke not about Jadidism in the Russian Empire, but about various forms of Jadidism. Despite the wide range of ideas and concepts regarding the definition of this movement, the Dagestan sources nevertheless show a certain picture, which allows us to approach the term Jadidism of the 20th century somewhat cautiously. Despite the fact that the Dagestan sources mention the term «usul-i-jadid», as well as the fact that the Egyptian reformers and their Dagestani followers are called jadids in local sources, we still try not to use this term in relation to Dagestan. Here we can talk more about Muslim reformism than about Jadidism, since the discussion of various issues in Dagestan proceeded exclusively within the framework of the Muslim theological tradition, with a system of definitions, symbols, images and concepts characteristic of Islamic discourse. Contrary to what Soviet and modern historiography writes about the Dagestan reformers, they were not supporters of the secularization of society, they did not call for adaptation and perception of European culture. Moreover, their views, in addition to being purely Islamic, also reflected their call to return to an earlier period of Islam, when Muslim society was at its peak. Comparing the movement of Muslim reformers and the Jadids of the Volga region and Dagestan, one can note a number of similarities in the ideas of the Tatars al-Kursawi, al-Marjani and the Dagestanis al-Kuduki, al-Gumuki. All these scholars came up with similar ideas of ijtihad. At the same time, despite some contacts between the Dagestan reformers and Jadids of the 20th century, and some similarities of ideas in matters of education reform, nevertheless, Jadidism in the Volga region at the beginning of the 20th century and reformism in Dagestan were different.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History Archeology and Ethnography of the Caucasus
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32653/ch202297-311
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HISTORIOGRAPHY AND SOURCE STUDY OF JADIDISM IN DAGESTAN

Shamil Shikhaliev, Amir R. Navruzov
History Archeology and Ethnography of the Caucasus
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

HISTORIOGRAPHY AND SOURCE STUDY OF JADIDISM IN DAGESTAN

Shamil Shikhaliev, Amir R. Navruzov
article en

Abstract

A review of the historiography of the development of Jadidism and Muslim reformism in the Volga region, Central Asia, Transcaucasia and the study of Arabographic sources on the North-Eastern Caucasus allowed us to agree with the conclusion of a number of Western scholars who spoke not about Jadidism in the Russian Empire, but about various forms of Jadidism. Despite the wide range of ideas and concepts regarding the definition of this movement, the Dagestan sources nevertheless show a certain picture, which allows us to approach the term Jadidism of the 20th century somewhat cautiously. Despite the fact that the Dagestan sources mention the term «usul-i-jadid», as well as the fact that the Egyptian reformers and their Dagestani followers are called jadids in local sources, we still try not to use this term in relation to Dagestan. Here we can talk more about Muslim reformism than about Jadidism, since the discussion of various issues in Dagestan proceeded exclusively within the framework of the Muslim theological tradition, with a system of definitions, symbols, images and concepts characteristic of Islamic discourse. Contrary to what Soviet and modern historiography writes about the Dagestan reformers, they were not supporters of the secularization of society, they did not call for adaptation and perception of European culture. Moreover, their views, in addition to being purely Islamic, also reflected their call to return to an earlier period of Islam, when Muslim society was at its peak. Comparing the movement of Muslim reformers and the Jadids of the Volga region and Dagestan, one can note a number of similarities in the ideas of the Tatars al-Kursawi, al-Marjani and the Dagestanis al-Kuduki, al-Gumuki. All these scholars came up with similar ideas of ijtihad. At the same time, despite some contacts between the Dagestan reformers and Jadids of the 20th century, and some similarities of ideas in matters of education reform, nevertheless, Jadidism in the Volga region at the beginning of the 20th century and reformism in Dagestan were different.

History Archeology and Ethnography of the CaucasusVol. 20(2)
Institute of Archeology and Ethnography (TM), Institute of Oriental Studies of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Institute of Oriental Studies (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.