DAGESTAN’S UNIONS OF RURAL COMMUNITIES: FORMATION, ETHNIC STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE SYSTEM

The unions of rural communities (URCs) of Dagestan were self-governing structures that united villages (jamaats), serving as a key component in the political organization of the Dagestani peoples. The primary functions of the URC encompassed a broad range of life support activities, including material, demographic, and spiritual reproduction, the continuity of generations, territorial protection, and maintaining independence. The ethnic factor played a nominal role in the URC formation, which primarily consisted of subethnic groups or unions of jamaats that shared specific dialects of a specific people. The governing bodies of URCs were established and located in the main villages, with a governance system that was generally uniform across Dagestani community unions. However, the URC governance system was unique in that its governing bodies typically functioned as the central villages’ governing bodies. While rural community residents did not directly participate in electing senior officials, they delegated representatives to all-union gatherings such as people’s assemblies and councils of elders. The highest administrative officials, including elders and qadis, of the central settlements were elected exclusively by residents of these settlements, despite their authority extending over the entire union of rural communities. The roles and responsibilities of these officials were meticulously detailed and strictly adhered to. URCs in Dagestan, documented since the Early Middle Ages, represent a new stage in socio-political self-organization, socio-cultural dynamics, and the formation of civil identity within the Dagestani multi-ethnic community, succeeding the emergence of large rural settlements (“shi,” “roso,” “khyur,” etc.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History Archeology and Ethnography of the Caucasus
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32653/ch203544-554
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DAGESTAN’S UNIONS OF RURAL COMMUNITIES: FORMATION, ETHNIC STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE SYSTEM

Б Г Алиев
History Archeology and Ethnography of the Caucasus
Soviet and Russian History
article

DAGESTAN’S UNIONS OF RURAL COMMUNITIES: FORMATION, ETHNIC STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE SYSTEM

Б Г Алиев
article en

Abstract

The unions of rural communities (URCs) of Dagestan were self-governing structures that united villages (jamaats), serving as a key component in the political organization of the Dagestani peoples. The primary functions of the URC encompassed a broad range of life support activities, including material, demographic, and spiritual reproduction, the continuity of generations, territorial protection, and maintaining independence. The ethnic factor played a nominal role in the URC formation, which primarily consisted of subethnic groups or unions of jamaats that shared specific dialects of a specific people. The governing bodies of URCs were established and located in the main villages, with a governance system that was generally uniform across Dagestani community unions. However, the URC governance system was unique in that its governing bodies typically functioned as the central villages’ governing bodies. While rural community residents did not directly participate in electing senior officials, they delegated representatives to all-union gatherings such as people’s assemblies and councils of elders. The highest administrative officials, including elders and qadis, of the central settlements were elected exclusively by residents of these settlements, despite their authority extending over the entire union of rural communities. The roles and responsibilities of these officials were meticulously detailed and strictly adhered to. URCs in Dagestan, documented since the Early Middle Ages, represent a new stage in socio-political self-organization, socio-cultural dynamics, and the formation of civil identity within the Dagestani multi-ethnic community, succeeding the emergence of large rural settlements (“shi,” “roso,” “khyur,” etc.).

History Archeology and Ethnography of the CaucasusVol. 20(3)
Institute of Archeology and Ethnography (TM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.