Quantitative study of local defects by pulsed eddy current testing

Pulsed eddy current testing (PECT) is a non-destructive evaluation technique capable of detecting defects within conductive materials; however, it often encounters challenges in accurately quantifying localized defects. This paper introduces a novel methodological approach and theoretical framework for the identification and quantification of such defects using a high-resolution focusing probe. The effective coverage area of the focusing probe is characterized by a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution model, enabling a detailed analysis of the probe’s interaction with the material under test. Analytical formulas are derived to describe the detection process, providing a foundation for subsequent error analysis. To optimize the detection process, four distinct types of error functions are formulated, and an optimization algorithm is employed to determine the parameters that minimize these error functions. This approach ensures that the probe settings are tailored to the specific characteristics of the defects being investigated. Simulation data are utilized to invert the probe parameters and extract defect information, thereby validating the feasibility and accuracy of the proposed method. The simulation results demonstrate that the method presented in this paper can effectively quantify defects with a high degree of precision. In conclusion, the research presented in this paper offers a significant advancement in the field of PECT by providing a robust method for the accurate quantification of localized defects. This contribution is expected to enhance the reliability and applicability of PECT in various industrial applications where the detection and quantification of defects are critical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0243754
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative study of local defects by pulsed eddy current testing

Zhaoyang Li, Liang Dong
2 citations
AIP Advances
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
0.43
article

Quantitative study of local defects by pulsed eddy current testing

Zhaoyang Li, Liang Dong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pulsed eddy current testing (PECT) is a non-destructive evaluation technique capable of detecting defects within conductive materials; however, it often encounters challenges in accurately quantifying localized defects. This paper introduces a novel methodological approach and theoretical framework for the identification and quantification of such defects using a high-resolution focusing probe. The effective coverage area of the focusing probe is characterized by a two-dimensional Gaussian distribution model, enabling a detailed analysis of the probe’s interaction with the material under test. Analytical formulas are derived to describe the detection process, providing a foundation for subsequent error analysis. To optimize the detection process, four distinct types of error functions are formulated, and an optimization algorithm is employed to determine the parameters that minimize these error functions. This approach ensures that the probe settings are tailored to the specific characteristics of the defects being investigated. Simulation data are utilized to invert the probe parameters and extract defect information, thereby validating the feasibility and accuracy of the proposed method. The simulation results demonstrate that the method presented in this paper can effectively quantify defects with a high degree of precision. In conclusion, the research presented in this paper offers a significant advancement in the field of PECT by providing a robust method for the accurate quantification of localized defects. This contribution is expected to enhance the reliability and applicability of PECT in various industrial applications where the detection and quantification of defects are critical.

AIP AdvancesVol. 14(12)
Shanghai Special Equipment Supervision and Inspection Institute (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
0.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.