WiFi Beacon Stuffing vs. BLE Connectionless Mode for Ephemeral Interactions in Smart Environments

In an era where many digital interactions are often short-lived and instantaneous, connectionless communication technologies have been emerging as pivotal enablers of such interactions. Unlike their connection-oriented counterparts, these technologies facilitate seamless, on-demand exchanges without the need for establishing persistent connections. Relying on technologies that are abundant and easily accessible for the end users contributes to the ubiquitous spread of connectionless communication. WiFi and BLE are two popular examples of such technologies as they are found now on all user devices. This paper explores their potential in realizing connectionless communication scenarios by experimentally comparing their usages for several use-cases in different application domains. Such a comparison is imperative to making an informed decision on which technology to use for a given application. We establish this comparison on ESP32 in terms of power consumption, delivery rate and distance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wimob61911.2024.10770526
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wireless Communication Networks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WiFi Beacon Stuffing vs. BLE Connectionless Mode for Ephemeral Interactions in Smart Environments

Paul Couderc, Mariam Issa, Jean-Marie Bonnin, Pedro Espinel-Galviz
1 citations
Wireless Communication Networks Research
0.35
article

WiFi Beacon Stuffing vs. BLE Connectionless Mode for Ephemeral Interactions in Smart Environments

Paul Couderc, Mariam Issa, Jean-Marie Bonnin, Pedro Espinel-Galviz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In an era where many digital interactions are often short-lived and instantaneous, connectionless communication technologies have been emerging as pivotal enablers of such interactions. Unlike their connection-oriented counterparts, these technologies facilitate seamless, on-demand exchanges without the need for establishing persistent connections. Relying on technologies that are abundant and easily accessible for the end users contributes to the ubiquitous spread of connectionless communication. WiFi and BLE are two popular examples of such technologies as they are found now on all user devices. This paper explores their potential in realizing connectionless communication scenarios by experimentally comparing their usages for several use-cases in different application domains. Such a comparison is imperative to making an informed decision on which technology to use for a given application. We establish this comparison on ESP32 in terms of power consumption, delivery rate and distance.

Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR), Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires (FR), IMT Atlantique (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Wireless Communication Networks Research
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.