Archaeological Narrative; or, Nostalgic Fascination with the Obsolete in the South Korean TV Drama <i>Reply 1988</i>

Abstract This article considers how a Korean television drama, Reply 1988 (tvN, 2015–16), functions as a form of public archaeology through its on-screen display of obsolete TV sets and televisual footage, treating television as a historical medium to illuminate the lives of those whom television has influenced since the 1980s. Reply 1988 also extends this recollected medium into emerging hypermedia and intertextual contexts, enabled primarily through contemporary digital technology. Viewers therefore find themselves in a puzzle-like structure—a temporal doubling. This raises questions about television's development in today's rapidly changing media environment. This article examines Reply 1988 as an archaeological narrative to seek to understand the show's response to cultural crises playing out in today's post-network, post-media era, casting new light on television's ethical role in generating communal values and informing an inquiry into the human condition in the contemporary moment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Camera Obscura Feminism Culture and Media Studies
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-11365864
Primary Topic
Asian Culture and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Archaeological Narrative; or, Nostalgic Fascination with the Obsolete in the South Korean TV Drama Reply 1988

Kyoung-Lae Kang
Camera Obscura Feminism Culture and Media Studies
Asian Culture and Media Studies
article

Archaeological Narrative; or, Nostalgic Fascination with the Obsolete in the South Korean TV Drama Reply 1988

Kyoung-Lae Kang
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article considers how a Korean television drama, Reply 1988 (tvN, 2015–16), functions as a form of public archaeology through its on-screen display of obsolete TV sets and televisual footage, treating television as a historical medium to illuminate the lives of those whom television has influenced since the 1980s. Reply 1988 also extends this recollected medium into emerging hypermedia and intertextual contexts, enabled primarily through contemporary digital technology. Viewers therefore find themselves in a puzzle-like structure—a temporal doubling. This raises questions about television's development in today's rapidly changing media environment. This article examines Reply 1988 as an archaeological narrative to seek to understand the show's response to cultural crises playing out in today's post-network, post-media era, casting new light on television's ethical role in generating communal values and informing an inquiry into the human condition in the contemporary moment.

Camera Obscura Feminism Culture and Media StudiesVol. 39(3)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Asian Culture and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Archaeological Narrative; or, Nostalgic Fascination with the Obsolete in the South Korean TV Drama <i>Reply 1988</i> — Kyoung-Lae Kang · Camera Obscura Feminism Culture and Media Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS