Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Patients with Newly Diagnosed, <i> <i>De Novo</i> <i>KIT</i> </i>-Mutated Non-Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia without Systemic Mastocytosis

Background Mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT (located on chromosome 4q12) have been reported in systemic mastocytosis (SM, in over 90% of cases), gastrointestinal stromal tumors, melanoma, and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In AML, KIT mutations are enriched in patients (pts) with the core-binding factor (CBF) abnormality (20-40% of pts). These mutations can occur in various exons throughout the KIT gene, with “hot spots” identified in exons 8, 10-11, and 17. This study aims to characterize the baseline features, molecular patterns, and survival outcomes in pts with newly diagnosed non-CBF AML that is not associated with SM, a population that has not previously been well-described. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on newly diagnosed adults with AML treated with first-line therapy between 2014 and 2024 at our institution to identify pts with KIT-mutated AML. Pts with wild-type KIT or KIT variants of unknown significance were excluded from the study. Among patients with KIT mutations, those with CBF AML, evidence of underlying SM, or history of antecedent hematological neoplasms (AHN) were also excluded. Results Among 3,240 newly diagnosed AML pts, 77 carried a pathogenic/likely pathogenic KIT mutation. After excluding patients with CBF AML (n=46), those with underling SM (n=5), or AHN (n=10), 16 patients remained in the analysis, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.5% in patients with newly diagnosed non-CBF, non-SM de novo AML. The median age of the cohort was 69 years (range: 36-90). The median KIT variant allelic frequency (VAF) was 15% (range, 5%-48%). All patients had a single missense point mutation in exon 17 of KIT, with no involvement of other exons. Specifically, the D816V mutation was present in 14 pts (88%), the D816H mutation in one pt, and the N822K mutation in one pt. In contrast, pts with KIT-mutated CBF AML had a wider distribution of KIT mutations, with 52% occurring outside of exon 17 and 5% of pts harboring more than one KIT mutation. NPM1 was the most common co-mutation, detected in 38% of patients. IDH1 or IDH2 mutations were detected in 31% (5/16) of the cohort, a higher frequency than expected in the general AML population. 31% of pts presented with either trisomy 4 or trisomy 8, and one pts exhibited a complex karyotype. 7 pts (44%) were treated with intensive chemotherapy, and nine patients (56%) received low-intensity chemotherapy, with or without venetoclax. 12 pts (75%) achieved either CR/CRi following first-line treatment. There was no correlation between KIT VAF and response rates. Despite a relatively high remission rate, the OS was poor, with a median OS of 9.0 months and a 12-month OS rate of 29%. The median RFS was 3.2 months and the 12-months RFS rate was 11%. Poor outcomes were observed in both intensively and non-intensively treated pts (median OS of 15 months and 5 months, respectively). OS was poor regardless of NPM1 mutation status, with a median OS of 9.2 months for those with mutated NPM1 compared to 10.7 months for pts with wild-type NPM1 (p=0.7). Overall, 7 patients (44%) relapsed. Among the 5 re-tested for KIT at relapse, only 1 showed an increase in KIT VAF, suggesting KIT mutations are unlikely to be the primary factor driving relapse in this cohort. Conclusion This is the first report specifically evaluating the incidence and clinical impact of KIT mutations in newly diagnosed non-CBF, non-SM AML. KIT mutations were very rare in this population and appear to exhibit a poor prognosis, regardless of co-mutation status. KIT missense point mutations in this population were exclusively located in exon 17, unlike what has been observed in CBF AML. Larger studies are needed to confirm the prognostic impact of KIT mutations in AML.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-199917
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mast cells and histamine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Patients with Newly Diagnosed, De Novo KIT -Mutated Non-Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia without Systemic Mastocytosis

Farhad Ravandi, Courtney Denton Dinardo, Prithviraj Bose, Tapan Mahendra Kadia et al.
1 citations
Blood
Mast cells and histamine
0.24
article

Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Patients with Newly Diagnosed, De Novo KIT -Mutated Non-Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia without Systemic Mastocytosis

Farhad Ravandi, Courtney Denton Dinardo, Prithviraj Bose, Tapan Mahendra Kadia, Naval Guastad Daver, Gautam M. Borthakur, Sanam Loghavi, Hussein A. Abbas, Ghayas C. Issa, Jayastu Senapati, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Nicholas James Short, Eitan Kugler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT (located on chromosome 4q12) have been reported in systemic mastocytosis (SM, in over 90% of cases), gastrointestinal stromal tumors, melanoma, and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In AML, KIT mutations are enriched in patients (pts) with the core-binding factor (CBF) abnormality (20-40% of pts). These mutations can occur in various exons throughout the KIT gene, with “hot spots” identified in exons 8, 10-11, and 17. This study aims to characterize the baseline features, molecular patterns, and survival outcomes in pts with newly diagnosed non-CBF AML that is not associated with SM, a population that has not previously been well-described. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on newly diagnosed adults with AML treated with first-line therapy between 2014 and 2024 at our institution to identify pts with KIT-mutated AML. Pts with wild-type KIT or KIT variants of unknown significance were excluded from the study. Among patients with KIT mutations, those with CBF AML, evidence of underlying SM, or history of antecedent hematological neoplasms (AHN) were also excluded. Results Among 3,240 newly diagnosed AML pts, 77 carried a pathogenic/likely pathogenic KIT mutation. After excluding patients with CBF AML (n=46), those with underling SM (n=5), or AHN (n=10), 16 patients remained in the analysis, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.5% in patients with newly diagnosed non-CBF, non-SM de novo AML. The median age of the cohort was 69 years (range: 36-90). The median KIT variant allelic frequency (VAF) was 15% (range, 5%-48%). All patients had a single missense point mutation in exon 17 of KIT, with no involvement of other exons. Specifically, the D816V mutation was present in 14 pts (88%), the D816H mutation in one pt, and the N822K mutation in one pt. In contrast, pts with KIT-mutated CBF AML had a wider distribution of KIT mutations, with 52% occurring outside of exon 17 and 5% of pts harboring more than one KIT mutation. NPM1 was the most common co-mutation, detected in 38% of patients. IDH1 or IDH2 mutations were detected in 31% (5/16) of the cohort, a higher frequency than expected in the general AML population. 31% of pts presented with either trisomy 4 or trisomy 8, and one pts exhibited a complex karyotype. 7 pts (44%) were treated with intensive chemotherapy, and nine patients (56%) received low-intensity chemotherapy, with or without venetoclax. 12 pts (75%) achieved either CR/CRi following first-line treatment. There was no correlation between KIT VAF and response rates. Despite a relatively high remission rate, the OS was poor, with a median OS of 9.0 months and a 12-month OS rate of 29%. The median RFS was 3.2 months and the 12-months RFS rate was 11%. Poor outcomes were observed in both intensively and non-intensively treated pts (median OS of 15 months and 5 months, respectively). OS was poor regardless of NPM1 mutation status, with a median OS of 9.2 months for those with mutated NPM1 compared to 10.7 months for pts with wild-type NPM1 (p=0.7). Overall, 7 patients (44%) relapsed. Among the 5 re-tested for KIT at relapse, only 1 showed an increase in KIT VAF, suggesting KIT mutations are unlikely to be the primary factor driving relapse in this cohort. Conclusion This is the first report specifically evaluating the incidence and clinical impact of KIT mutations in newly diagnosed non-CBF, non-SM AML. KIT mutations were very rare in this population and appear to exhibit a poor prognosis, regardless of co-mutation status. KIT missense point mutations in this population were exclusively located in exon 17, unlike what has been observed in CBF AML. Larger studies are needed to confirm the prognostic impact of KIT mutations in AML.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, PTC Therapeutics, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Adaptive Biotechnologies, CTI Biopharma, Incyte, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas Pharma, Servier, Menarini Group, Genentech
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Mast cells and histamine
0.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.