How People with Sickle Cell Disease Rate Motivators is Associated with the Likelihood of Wanting to Participate in a Clinical Trial: Findings from the Global LISTEN Survey

Background: The success of clinical trials for sickle cell disease (SCD) and global generalizability of the results rely on securing a sufficiently large and diverse participant pool. The global Learnings and Insights into Sickle Cell Trial Experiences (LISTEN) Survey investigated the attitudes towards SCD clinical trial participation among people with SCD (PwSCD). The survey identified several motivators and barriers affecting decisions to participate in clinical trials. The importance of individualized communication to improve clinical trial access and recruitment was a key finding of the LISTEN Survey (James J et al. Blood 2023;142[Suppl 1]:2498). Aim: In this LISTEN Survey analysis, we investigate how demographics, characteristics, and factors representing the experiences and attitudes of PwSCD may impact the likelihood of wanting to participate in an SCD clinical trial. Methods: Between October 2022 and August 2023, adults with SCD (≥18 years old) from 17 countries completed a quantitative survey. The survey assessed the importance of motivators (e.g., better manage symptoms or increase knowledge of SCD) and barriers (e.g., different side effects or missing work/school) that affect decisions to participate in a clinical trial by rating them on a 7-point scale. Using regression analysis, we investigated the association between contextual factors and responses to the survey question, “In general, how likely do you think you are to want to take part in a clinical trial for SCD?” (rated on a 5-point scale from very unlikely to very likely). Contextual factors included demographics and characteristics such as gender, living location, having dependents, life satisfaction, financial situation, and treatment preferences. Additional contextual factors were derived from factor analysis, grouping responses to multiple questions into categories including importance of motivators, importance of barriers, impact of symptoms on daily life, frequency of receiving SCD care and information, frequency of pain management, trust and relationship with healthcare professionals (HCPs), frequency of interaction with the SCD community, and usefulness of SCD information. Key contextual factors identified from the regression analysis were analyzed further. Results: A total of 1,145 PwSCD (58% female) with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range: 24-38) participated in the LISTEN Survey. Of these, 67% (n=772) had never been invited to participate in an SCD clinical trial. When PwSCD were asked how likely they would be to want to participate in a clinical trial, 13% of respondents (n=146) were very unlikely, 10% (n=118) were unlikely, 23% (n=269) were neither likely nor unlikely, 36% (n=408) were likely, and 18% were (n=204) very likely. Regression analysis revealed that how PwSCD rated the importance of motivators had the greatest association with the likelihood of wanting to participate in a clinical trial (standardized regression coefficient [β]=0.38; p<0.01). Other positively associated contextual factors were frequent interaction with the SCD community (β=0.12), living in a rural location (β=0.11), preferring to receive a different treatment (β=0.09), and frequently receiving SCD care and information (β=0.08; all p<0.01). How PwSCD rated the importance of barriers was not associated. Reporting a comfortable financial situation was negatively associated with the likelihood of wanting to participate in a clinical trial (β=−0.08; p<0.05). Further analysis indicated that the importance of certain motivators was higher among those educated to at least university degree level than those not educated to university degree level. Few differences in the importance of motivators were observed based on household income and rural living location. Conclusions: HCPs, industry and patient organizations should be aware that individuals' perceptions of the positive aspects of clinical trials in SCD may affect their decision to participate. This awareness is crucial, as 23% of PwSCD who responded to the LISTEN Survey were undecided about participating in a clinical trial, highlighting a need to raise awareness and understanding of clinical trials. Ensuring clinical trial opportunities are accessible to all PwSCD and understanding the reasons that motivate individuals may improve participation in SCD clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-200009
Primary Topic
Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How People with Sickle Cell Disease Rate Motivators is Associated with the Likelihood of Wanting to Participate in a Clinical Trial: Findings from the Global LISTEN Survey

Samar Al-Behaisi, Gareth Morrell, John Waller, Raffaella Colombatti et al.
Blood
Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
article

How People with Sickle Cell Disease Rate Motivators is Associated with the Likelihood of Wanting to Participate in a Clinical Trial: Findings from the Global LISTEN Survey

Samar Al-Behaisi, Gareth Morrell, John Waller, Raffaella Colombatti, Johnny Ndoni Mahlangu, Biree Andemariam, John James
article en

Abstract

Background: The success of clinical trials for sickle cell disease (SCD) and global generalizability of the results rely on securing a sufficiently large and diverse participant pool. The global Learnings and Insights into Sickle Cell Trial Experiences (LISTEN) Survey investigated the attitudes towards SCD clinical trial participation among people with SCD (PwSCD). The survey identified several motivators and barriers affecting decisions to participate in clinical trials. The importance of individualized communication to improve clinical trial access and recruitment was a key finding of the LISTEN Survey (James J et al. Blood 2023;142[Suppl 1]:2498). Aim: In this LISTEN Survey analysis, we investigate how demographics, characteristics, and factors representing the experiences and attitudes of PwSCD may impact the likelihood of wanting to participate in an SCD clinical trial. Methods: Between October 2022 and August 2023, adults with SCD (≥18 years old) from 17 countries completed a quantitative survey. The survey assessed the importance of motivators (e.g., better manage symptoms or increase knowledge of SCD) and barriers (e.g., different side effects or missing work/school) that affect decisions to participate in a clinical trial by rating them on a 7-point scale. Using regression analysis, we investigated the association between contextual factors and responses to the survey question, “In general, how likely do you think you are to want to take part in a clinical trial for SCD?” (rated on a 5-point scale from very unlikely to very likely). Contextual factors included demographics and characteristics such as gender, living location, having dependents, life satisfaction, financial situation, and treatment preferences. Additional contextual factors were derived from factor analysis, grouping responses to multiple questions into categories including importance of motivators, importance of barriers, impact of symptoms on daily life, frequency of receiving SCD care and information, frequency of pain management, trust and relationship with healthcare professionals (HCPs), frequency of interaction with the SCD community, and usefulness of SCD information. Key contextual factors identified from the regression analysis were analyzed further. Results: A total of 1,145 PwSCD (58% female) with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range: 24-38) participated in the LISTEN Survey. Of these, 67% (n=772) had never been invited to participate in an SCD clinical trial. When PwSCD were asked how likely they would be to want to participate in a clinical trial, 13% of respondents (n=146) were very unlikely, 10% (n=118) were unlikely, 23% (n=269) were neither likely nor unlikely, 36% (n=408) were likely, and 18% were (n=204) very likely. Regression analysis revealed that how PwSCD rated the importance of motivators had the greatest association with the likelihood of wanting to participate in a clinical trial (standardized regression coefficient [β]=0.38; p<0.01). Other positively associated contextual factors were frequent interaction with the SCD community (β=0.12), living in a rural location (β=0.11), preferring to receive a different treatment (β=0.09), and frequently receiving SCD care and information (β=0.08; all p<0.01). How PwSCD rated the importance of barriers was not associated. Reporting a comfortable financial situation was negatively associated with the likelihood of wanting to participate in a clinical trial (β=−0.08; p<0.05). Further analysis indicated that the importance of certain motivators was higher among those educated to at least university degree level than those not educated to university degree level. Few differences in the importance of motivators were observed based on household income and rural living location. Conclusions: HCPs, industry and patient organizations should be aware that individuals' perceptions of the positive aspects of clinical trials in SCD may affect their decision to participate. This awareness is crucial, as 23% of PwSCD who responded to the LISTEN Survey were undecided about participating in a clinical trial, highlighting a need to raise awareness and understanding of clinical trials. Ensuring clinical trial opportunities are accessible to all PwSCD and understanding the reasons that motivate individuals may improve participation in SCD clinical trials.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
University of Padua (IT), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Multiple Sclerosis Society (GB), Novo Nordisk (Switzerland) (CH), UConn Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.