Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (Isa-VRd) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Not Eligible or with No Immediate Intent for Transplant: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety in a Phase 1b Study

Introduction The anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab (Isa) mediates anti-myeloma activity through multiple mechanisms of action and it is approved with carfilzomib-dexamethasone or pomalidomide-dexamethasone for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM. A multi-center Ph. 1b study (TCD13983; NCT02513186) showed preliminary efficacy of Isa in quadruplet combination with VRd followed by Isa-Rd maintenance therapy in pts with NDMM not eligible or with no immediate intent for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), with a manageable safety profile (Ocio et al. Leukemia 2023;37:1521-29). In a prespecified interim analysis of the randomized, global Ph. 3 IMROZ study (NCT03319667), treatment with Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (HR, 0.60; 98.5% CI, 0.41-0.88; p<0.001) and deep responses in transplant-ineligible NDMM pts compared with VRd followed by Rd (Facon et al. N Engl J Med 2024;June 3). In this analysis, we evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd in the overall Ph. 1b pt population and in the subgroups of pts ≥75 yrs of age or with no immediate intent for ASCT (noIInt-ASCT pts included in Part B of the study). Methods NDMM pts without age restriction received four 6-week cycles of Isa-VRd (Isa 10 mg/kg IV, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 SC, lenalidomide 25 mg PO, dexamethasone 20 mg IV/PO) followed by Isa-Rd maintenance in 4-week cycles. Primary study endpoint was complete response (CR). The efficacy population included pts who had completed cycle 1 and received >2 weekly Isa administrations, with investigator-assessed response. MRD negativity was evaluated by central-laboratory next-generation sequencing (NGS) at 10-5 sensitivity in pts with ≥VGPR as best response at any point on study. PFS was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Results 73 NDMM pts received Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd. Median age was 71.0 (range, 49-87) yrs, including 15 (20.5%) pts ≥75 yrs and 4 (5.5%) >80 yrs of age. Nine (12.3%) pts had a creatinine clearance ≥30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Thirteen (17.8%) noIInt-ASCT pts did not receive an ASCT in frontline (4/13 received an ASCT in 2nd line). The overall response rate was 98.6% in all efficacy-evaluable pts (n=71), 100% in pts ≥75 yrs (n=14), and 100% in noIInt-ASCT pts (n=13), with ≥CR in 63.4%, 64.3%, and 53.8% of pts, respectively. Median PFS was not reached in the overall population nor in the noIInt-ASCT pt subgroup (data cutoff 3May23; median follow-up, 44.3 mo and 30.7 mo, respectively), and it was 51.9 mo in pts ≥75 yrs (median follow-up, 46.3 mo). Rates of PFS in all efficacy-evaluable pts (n=71) were 77.5% at 3 yrs and 71.9% at 5 yrs, 64.3% at 3 yrs and 48.2% at 5 yrs in pts ≥75 yrs (n=14), and 90.0% at 3 yrs in noIInt-ASCT pts (n=13), consistent with IMROZ Isa-VRd observations of 76.1% at 3 yrs and 63.2% at 5 yrs. MRD negativity by NGS (at 10-5 in pts with ≥VGPR) was achieved by 56.3% of pts overall (n=71), 57.1% of pts ≥75 yrs (n=14), and 30.8% of noIInt-ASCT pts (n=13). 34.2% of all pts, 33.3% of pts ≥75 yrs, and 30.7% of noll-ASCT pts were still on treatment, with a median duration of exposure of 41.5 mo (43.3 mo in pts ≥75 yrs; 16.5 mo in noIInt-ASCT pts). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 80.8% of all treated pts (n=73), 100% of pts ≥75 yrs (n=15), and 61.5% of noIInt-ASCT pts (n=13); serious TEAEs occurred in 58.9%, 80.0%, and 61.5% of pts, respectively. Grade ≥3 infections were observed in 26.0% of all treated pts, 40.0% of pts ≥75 yrs, and 23.1% of noIInt-ASCT pts (44.9% in IMROZ Isa-VRd, 38.1% in VRd pts). Treatment was well tolerated with definitive treatment discontinuations due to AE in 21.9% of all treated pts, 33% of pts ≥75 yrs, and 15.4% of noIInt-ASCT pts. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd maintenance in the overall population of NDMM pts without age restriction and in the subgroups of pts ≥75 yrs old or with no immediate intent for ASCT. The PFS results observed in this study are consistent with those reported in transplant-ineligible pts in the IMROZ trial, suggesting that the longer-term benefit with Isa-VRd extends to this broader population of pts with NDMM. Clinical trial registration: NCT02513186. Funding: Sanofi.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-200135
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (Isa-VRd) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Not Eligible or with No Immediate Intent for Transplant: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety in a Phase 1b Study

Enrique M. Ocio, Jesús F. San Miguel, Pierre Bories, Stefania Oliva et al.
1 citations
Blood
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
0.45
article

Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (Isa-VRd) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Not Eligible or with No Immediate Intent for Transplant: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety in a Phase 1b Study

Enrique M. Ocio, Jesús F. San Miguel, Pierre Bories, Stefania Oliva, Sara Bringhen, María‐Victoria Mateos, Joaquín Martínez‐López, Lionel Karlin, Helgi van de Velde, Song‐Yau Wang, Bruno Paiva, Axel Nogai, Ercem Kodas, Sandrine Macé, Paula Rodríguez‐Otero, Aurore Perrot, Yi Li, Philippe Moreau, Eric Le Bras
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction The anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab (Isa) mediates anti-myeloma activity through multiple mechanisms of action and it is approved with carfilzomib-dexamethasone or pomalidomide-dexamethasone for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM. A multi-center Ph. 1b study (TCD13983; NCT02513186) showed preliminary efficacy of Isa in quadruplet combination with VRd followed by Isa-Rd maintenance therapy in pts with NDMM not eligible or with no immediate intent for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), with a manageable safety profile (Ocio et al. Leukemia 2023;37:1521-29). In a prespecified interim analysis of the randomized, global Ph. 3 IMROZ study (NCT03319667), treatment with Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (HR, 0.60; 98.5% CI, 0.41-0.88; p<0.001) and deep responses in transplant-ineligible NDMM pts compared with VRd followed by Rd (Facon et al. N Engl J Med 2024;June 3). In this analysis, we evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd in the overall Ph. 1b pt population and in the subgroups of pts ≥75 yrs of age or with no immediate intent for ASCT (noIInt-ASCT pts included in Part B of the study). Methods NDMM pts without age restriction received four 6-week cycles of Isa-VRd (Isa 10 mg/kg IV, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 SC, lenalidomide 25 mg PO, dexamethasone 20 mg IV/PO) followed by Isa-Rd maintenance in 4-week cycles. Primary study endpoint was complete response (CR). The efficacy population included pts who had completed cycle 1 and received >2 weekly Isa administrations, with investigator-assessed response. MRD negativity was evaluated by central-laboratory next-generation sequencing (NGS) at 10-5 sensitivity in pts with ≥VGPR as best response at any point on study. PFS was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Results 73 NDMM pts received Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd. Median age was 71.0 (range, 49-87) yrs, including 15 (20.5%) pts ≥75 yrs and 4 (5.5%) >80 yrs of age. Nine (12.3%) pts had a creatinine clearance ≥30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Thirteen (17.8%) noIInt-ASCT pts did not receive an ASCT in frontline (4/13 received an ASCT in 2nd line). The overall response rate was 98.6% in all efficacy-evaluable pts (n=71), 100% in pts ≥75 yrs (n=14), and 100% in noIInt-ASCT pts (n=13), with ≥CR in 63.4%, 64.3%, and 53.8% of pts, respectively. Median PFS was not reached in the overall population nor in the noIInt-ASCT pt subgroup (data cutoff 3May23; median follow-up, 44.3 mo and 30.7 mo, respectively), and it was 51.9 mo in pts ≥75 yrs (median follow-up, 46.3 mo). Rates of PFS in all efficacy-evaluable pts (n=71) were 77.5% at 3 yrs and 71.9% at 5 yrs, 64.3% at 3 yrs and 48.2% at 5 yrs in pts ≥75 yrs (n=14), and 90.0% at 3 yrs in noIInt-ASCT pts (n=13), consistent with IMROZ Isa-VRd observations of 76.1% at 3 yrs and 63.2% at 5 yrs. MRD negativity by NGS (at 10-5 in pts with ≥VGPR) was achieved by 56.3% of pts overall (n=71), 57.1% of pts ≥75 yrs (n=14), and 30.8% of noIInt-ASCT pts (n=13). 34.2% of all pts, 33.3% of pts ≥75 yrs, and 30.7% of noll-ASCT pts were still on treatment, with a median duration of exposure of 41.5 mo (43.3 mo in pts ≥75 yrs; 16.5 mo in noIInt-ASCT pts). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 80.8% of all treated pts (n=73), 100% of pts ≥75 yrs (n=15), and 61.5% of noIInt-ASCT pts (n=13); serious TEAEs occurred in 58.9%, 80.0%, and 61.5% of pts, respectively. Grade ≥3 infections were observed in 26.0% of all treated pts, 40.0% of pts ≥75 yrs, and 23.1% of noIInt-ASCT pts (44.9% in IMROZ Isa-VRd, 38.1% in VRd pts). Treatment was well tolerated with definitive treatment discontinuations due to AE in 21.9% of all treated pts, 33% of pts ≥75 yrs, and 15.4% of noIInt-ASCT pts. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with Isa-VRd followed by Isa-Rd maintenance in the overall population of NDMM pts without age restriction and in the subgroups of pts ≥75 yrs old or with no immediate intent for ASCT. The PFS results observed in this study are consistent with those reported in transplant-ineligible pts in the IMROZ trial, suggesting that the longer-term benefit with Isa-VRd extends to this broader population of pts with NDMM. Clinical trial registration: NCT02513186. Funding: Sanofi.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Cantabria (ES), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Sanofi (France) (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), MSB Medical School Berlin (DE), Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (FR), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Ospedale Sant'Anna (IT), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (ES), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Sanofi (China) (CN), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (ES), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Nantes Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.