Patient Reported Outcomes during Long-Term Follow-up of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in the Era of Terminal Complement Inhibition

Introduction Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a thrombotic microangiopathy driven by dysregulation of the complement system leading to predominantly renal dysfunction with high morbidity and mortality. While treatment with terminal complement blockade has improved hematologic and renal outcomes in aHUS, patients continue to experience impaired global health status. Patient experience and symptom burden in the current treatment era have not been characterized. Methods We administered Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments to patients with aHUS to assess 7 global health domains (PROMIS-29v2.0 including physical function, fatigue, pain, depression, anxiety, participation in social roles, and sleep disturbance), cognitive function (Cognitive Function 8a) and social isolation (Social Isolation 4a). Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures were chosen based on input from clinicians and representatives from the aHUS Alliance, a global patient advocacy group. Numerical variables were reported as median with interquartile range (IQR) or mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables as counts and percentages. We used the single-sided T test to compare T scores on these instruments with the population norm and the Mann Whitney test to compare groups based on need for dialysis and relapse status. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Fifty-five individuals (85% female, median (IQR) age 42 (21) years) with aHUS completed the instruments. The median (IQR) time from diagnosis was 50 (72) months. Of respondents, 89% reported confirmatory genetic testing, 87% stated their disease was currently under good control, and 82% were on complement inhibition when surveyed while 15% had discontinued anticomplement therapy; 2 (3.6%) had not been on anticomplement therapy. A majority (69%) required dialysis at some point, 9% remained on dialysis when surveyed, and 24% had undergone a kidney transplant. Regarding disease relapse, 22% had experienced one or more aHUS relapses, 67% never relapsed, and 11% did not know if they had relapsed and were not included in this sub-analysis. Patients reported the following symptom burden over the preceding 4 weeks: fatigue (80%), headaches (51%), drowsiness (46%), confusion or foggy thinking (44%), difficulty remembering things (44%), nausea (44%), stomach pain (29%), diarrhea (29%), and swelling of the lower extremities (20%). Joint pain, unexplained bruising, and bone pain were also reported (2% each). Compared to the US population norm (mean ± SD, 50 ± 10), our aHUS cohort had significantly higher scores for anxiety (59.2 ± 9.7, P< 0.001), depression (55.8 ± 9.7, P<0.001), fatigue (59.3 ± 55.8, P< 0.001) and sleep disturbance (53.6 ± 7.5, P < 0.001), and lower scores for physical functioning (44.5 ± 8.9, P<0.001) and cognitive function (41.4 ± 12.0, P<0.011) suggesting overall worse functioning in several domains. Patients who had experienced one or more relapses had lower physical function T scores [39.2 ± 5.4 vs 46.4 ± 8.8, P=0.034] and lower ability to participate in social roles [ 42.7 ± 4.9 vs 49.3 ± 9.3, P=0.048] compared with patients without relapse. T scores on the PRO instruments were not significantly different among patients who received dialysis at any point versus never on dialysis. Conclusions In this first study focusing on PROs during long-term follow up of aHUS, patients with aHUS report chronically impaired global health status with reduced physical and cognitive function, and higher levels of fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances compared with the general population. Relapsing aHUS is associated with patient-reported worse physical function and reduced ability to participate in social roles. Our results highlight the need to incorporate PRO assessments in clinical trials of novel agents in aHUS, and for research to evaluate potential factors contributing to poor functional outcomes including ongoing microvascular insults to the central nervous system, treatment-related effects, or another cause.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-200224
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Complement system in diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Reported Outcomes during Long-Term Follow-up of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in the Era of Terminal Complement Inhibition

Jenna Brown, Keith R. McCrae, Anne Hubben, Shruti Chaturvedi et al.
1 citations
Blood
Complement system in diseases
0.24
article

Patient Reported Outcomes during Long-Term Follow-up of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in the Era of Terminal Complement Inhibition

Jenna Brown, Keith R. McCrae, Anne Hubben, Shruti Chaturvedi, Len Woodward, Linda Burke, Clare Martin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a thrombotic microangiopathy driven by dysregulation of the complement system leading to predominantly renal dysfunction with high morbidity and mortality. While treatment with terminal complement blockade has improved hematologic and renal outcomes in aHUS, patients continue to experience impaired global health status. Patient experience and symptom burden in the current treatment era have not been characterized. Methods We administered Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments to patients with aHUS to assess 7 global health domains (PROMIS-29v2.0 including physical function, fatigue, pain, depression, anxiety, participation in social roles, and sleep disturbance), cognitive function (Cognitive Function 8a) and social isolation (Social Isolation 4a). Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures were chosen based on input from clinicians and representatives from the aHUS Alliance, a global patient advocacy group. Numerical variables were reported as median with interquartile range (IQR) or mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables as counts and percentages. We used the single-sided T test to compare T scores on these instruments with the population norm and the Mann Whitney test to compare groups based on need for dialysis and relapse status. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Fifty-five individuals (85% female, median (IQR) age 42 (21) years) with aHUS completed the instruments. The median (IQR) time from diagnosis was 50 (72) months. Of respondents, 89% reported confirmatory genetic testing, 87% stated their disease was currently under good control, and 82% were on complement inhibition when surveyed while 15% had discontinued anticomplement therapy; 2 (3.6%) had not been on anticomplement therapy. A majority (69%) required dialysis at some point, 9% remained on dialysis when surveyed, and 24% had undergone a kidney transplant. Regarding disease relapse, 22% had experienced one or more aHUS relapses, 67% never relapsed, and 11% did not know if they had relapsed and were not included in this sub-analysis. Patients reported the following symptom burden over the preceding 4 weeks: fatigue (80%), headaches (51%), drowsiness (46%), confusion or foggy thinking (44%), difficulty remembering things (44%), nausea (44%), stomach pain (29%), diarrhea (29%), and swelling of the lower extremities (20%). Joint pain, unexplained bruising, and bone pain were also reported (2% each). Compared to the US population norm (mean ± SD, 50 ± 10), our aHUS cohort had significantly higher scores for anxiety (59.2 ± 9.7, P< 0.001), depression (55.8 ± 9.7, P<0.001), fatigue (59.3 ± 55.8, P< 0.001) and sleep disturbance (53.6 ± 7.5, P < 0.001), and lower scores for physical functioning (44.5 ± 8.9, P<0.001) and cognitive function (41.4 ± 12.0, P<0.011) suggesting overall worse functioning in several domains. Patients who had experienced one or more relapses had lower physical function T scores [39.2 ± 5.4 vs 46.4 ± 8.8, P=0.034] and lower ability to participate in social roles [ 42.7 ± 4.9 vs 49.3 ± 9.3, P=0.048] compared with patients without relapse. T scores on the PRO instruments were not significantly different among patients who received dialysis at any point versus never on dialysis. Conclusions In this first study focusing on PROs during long-term follow up of aHUS, patients with aHUS report chronically impaired global health status with reduced physical and cognitive function, and higher levels of fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances compared with the general population. Relapsing aHUS is associated with patient-reported worse physical function and reduced ability to participate in social roles. Our results highlight the need to incorporate PRO assessments in clinical trials of novel agents in aHUS, and for research to evaluate potential factors contributing to poor functional outcomes including ongoing microvascular insults to the central nervous system, treatment-related effects, or another cause.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Complement system in diseases
0.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.