Improved Survival with Daratumumab-Cybord Compared to Cybord As Frontline Therapy in Immunoglobulin Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Background: AL amyloidosis is a potentially fatal plasma cell dyscrasia. In a randomized phase 3 study (Kastritis E et al, NEJM 2021;385:46-58), the addition of daratumumab to cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) significantly improved hematological and organ responses, and prolonged event-free survival (EFS). There was no overall survival (OS) difference at a median follow-up of 11.4 months. Methods: A retrospective study of AL amyloidosis patients seen at our institution between January 2018 and December 2022 who received upfront Dara-CyBorD or CyBorD. We excluded patients who received other forms of upfront therapy (including modifications of the above regimens, such as bortezomib-dexamethasone or daratumumab-dexamethasone). We compared the hematologic and organ responses, EFS and OS between the two treatment groups. Hematologic response was assessed at 2 and 6 months from therapy initiation, while cardiac and renal responses at 6- and 12-month landmarks. In all response evaluations, we included responses up to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) if used or second-line therapy for any reason. For EFS analysis, an event was defined as death of any cause, hematological progression, end-stage cardiac or renal failure, or need for subsequent anti-plasma cell therapy in the absence of hematological progression. OS was calculated from the time of treatment initiation to death or last follow-up. Results: Among 641 newly diagnosed patients seen at our center between 2018 and 2022, 361 patients (56%) were included on intention-to-treat analysis [Dara-CyBorD =147 (41% of the cohort); CyBorD=214 (59%)]. There was no difference in the baseline characteristics between the treatment groups, including age, sex, difference between involved and uninvolved light chains, bone marrow plasma cells percentage, NT-proBNP and 24-hour proteinuria. The 2-month hematologic complete response (hemCR; 15.3% vs 4.4%, P<0.001) and very good partial response or better (≥hemVGPR; 62.2% vs 32.5%, respectively; P<0.001) were higher with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD. At 6 months, the hemCR and ≥hemVGPR were again in favor of the Dara-CyBorD group compared to CyBorD (32.0% vs 13.7%, and 72.8% vs 46.7%, respectively; P≤0.002). The 6- and 12-month cardiac response rate in the Dara-CyBorD and CyBorD groups were 40.2% vs 22.6% (P=0.01) and 44.1% vs 23.2%, respectively (P=0.006). Cardiac ≥VGPR at the 6- and 12-month landmarks were statistically higher with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD and increased in both arms between 6 and 12 months [20.5 % vs 9.3% (P=0.03) and 34.3 % vs 20.0% (P=0.04), respectively]. The 6-month and 12-month renal response to first-line therapy were numerically higher with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD but were not statistically significant (48% vs 31.3%, P=0.10; 54.1% vs 30.1%, P=0.05). The 6 month and 12 months, renal ≥VGPR were numerically higher with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD, again without statistical significance (26% vs 19.6%, P=0.63; 35.7% vs 17.2%, P=0.11, respectively). Treatment with Dara-CyBorD was significantly associated with lower 6-month mortality rate compared to CyBorD (8.8% vs 16.3%, P=0.04). With a median follow-up of 43.3 months (30 vs 59.4 months for Dara-CyBorD vs CyBorD, respectively; P<0.001), the two-year EFS was superior in the Dara-CyBorD group compared to CyBorD (69.1% vs 30.3%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26 to 0.48, P<0.001). The 2-year OS was also statistically higher in the Dara-CyBorD group compared to CyBorD (82.0% vs 69.6%, HR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.79, P=0.003). 148 patients (40.9%) proceeded to second-line therapy with a median of 5.1 months from first line therapy. To adjust for difference in follow-up time between the two treatment groups, we analyzed the second line therapy utilization at the 12-month mark which was statistically higher with CyBorD compared to Dara-CyBorD (42.9% vs 14.9%, P<0.001). Also, at 12 months, a higher proportion of patients treated with CyBorD received ASCT compared to Dara-CyBorD (24.3% vs 13.6%, P= 0.01). Conclusions: In this cohort of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients in a large referral center, we confirmed higher hematological and organ response rates with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD. We have also demonstrated that these higher response rates translate into a survival advantage of Dara-CyBorD over CyBorD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-209102
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Survival with Daratumumab-Cybord Compared to Cybord As Frontline Therapy in Immunoglobulin Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Angela A. Dispenzieri, Joselle Cook, David Dingli, Francis K. Buadi et al.
Blood
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

Improved Survival with Daratumumab-Cybord Compared to Cybord As Frontline Therapy in Immunoglobulin Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Angela A. Dispenzieri, Joselle Cook, David Dingli, Francis K. Buadi, Ronald S. Go, Binoy Yohannan, Prashant Kapoor, Amie Fonder, Moritz Binder, Yi L. Hwa, Yi Lin, Rahma Warsame, Matthew J. Rees, S. Vincent Rajkumar, Wilson I. Gonsalves, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Martha Q. Lacy, Eli Muchtar, Michelle Rogers, Nelson Leung, Suzanne R. Hayman, Morie A. Gertz, Shaji Kumar, Miriam Hobbs
article en

Abstract

Background: AL amyloidosis is a potentially fatal plasma cell dyscrasia. In a randomized phase 3 study (Kastritis E et al, NEJM 2021;385:46-58), the addition of daratumumab to cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) significantly improved hematological and organ responses, and prolonged event-free survival (EFS). There was no overall survival (OS) difference at a median follow-up of 11.4 months. Methods: A retrospective study of AL amyloidosis patients seen at our institution between January 2018 and December 2022 who received upfront Dara-CyBorD or CyBorD. We excluded patients who received other forms of upfront therapy (including modifications of the above regimens, such as bortezomib-dexamethasone or daratumumab-dexamethasone). We compared the hematologic and organ responses, EFS and OS between the two treatment groups. Hematologic response was assessed at 2 and 6 months from therapy initiation, while cardiac and renal responses at 6- and 12-month landmarks. In all response evaluations, we included responses up to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) if used or second-line therapy for any reason. For EFS analysis, an event was defined as death of any cause, hematological progression, end-stage cardiac or renal failure, or need for subsequent anti-plasma cell therapy in the absence of hematological progression. OS was calculated from the time of treatment initiation to death or last follow-up. Results: Among 641 newly diagnosed patients seen at our center between 2018 and 2022, 361 patients (56%) were included on intention-to-treat analysis [Dara-CyBorD =147 (41% of the cohort); CyBorD=214 (59%)]. There was no difference in the baseline characteristics between the treatment groups, including age, sex, difference between involved and uninvolved light chains, bone marrow plasma cells percentage, NT-proBNP and 24-hour proteinuria. The 2-month hematologic complete response (hemCR; 15.3% vs 4.4%, P<0.001) and very good partial response or better (≥hemVGPR; 62.2% vs 32.5%, respectively; P<0.001) were higher with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD. At 6 months, the hemCR and ≥hemVGPR were again in favor of the Dara-CyBorD group compared to CyBorD (32.0% vs 13.7%, and 72.8% vs 46.7%, respectively; P≤0.002). The 6- and 12-month cardiac response rate in the Dara-CyBorD and CyBorD groups were 40.2% vs 22.6% (P=0.01) and 44.1% vs 23.2%, respectively (P=0.006). Cardiac ≥VGPR at the 6- and 12-month landmarks were statistically higher with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD and increased in both arms between 6 and 12 months [20.5 % vs 9.3% (P=0.03) and 34.3 % vs 20.0% (P=0.04), respectively]. The 6-month and 12-month renal response to first-line therapy were numerically higher with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD but were not statistically significant (48% vs 31.3%, P=0.10; 54.1% vs 30.1%, P=0.05). The 6 month and 12 months, renal ≥VGPR were numerically higher with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD, again without statistical significance (26% vs 19.6%, P=0.63; 35.7% vs 17.2%, P=0.11, respectively). Treatment with Dara-CyBorD was significantly associated with lower 6-month mortality rate compared to CyBorD (8.8% vs 16.3%, P=0.04). With a median follow-up of 43.3 months (30 vs 59.4 months for Dara-CyBorD vs CyBorD, respectively; P<0.001), the two-year EFS was superior in the Dara-CyBorD group compared to CyBorD (69.1% vs 30.3%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26 to 0.48, P<0.001). The 2-year OS was also statistically higher in the Dara-CyBorD group compared to CyBorD (82.0% vs 69.6%, HR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.79, P=0.003). 148 patients (40.9%) proceeded to second-line therapy with a median of 5.1 months from first line therapy. To adjust for difference in follow-up time between the two treatment groups, we analyzed the second line therapy utilization at the 12-month mark which was statistically higher with CyBorD compared to Dara-CyBorD (42.9% vs 14.9%, P<0.001). Also, at 12 months, a higher proportion of patients treated with CyBorD received ASCT compared to Dara-CyBorD (24.3% vs 13.6%, P= 0.01). Conclusions: In this cohort of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients in a large referral center, we confirmed higher hematological and organ response rates with Dara-CyBorD compared to CyBorD. We have also demonstrated that these higher response rates translate into a survival advantage of Dara-CyBorD over CyBorD.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
University of Minnesota (US), Mayo Clinic (US), WinnMed (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.