Extended Follow up and Immune Alterations in Patients with Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) Treated with Frontline Single Agent Pembrolizumab Followed By AVD Chemotherapy
Background: Hodgkin cells evade immune response through several mechanisms including overexpression of PD-L1/2, reduction of MHC expression, production of indolamine (IDO), secretion of inhibitory cytokines, and alterations to the microenvironment. We conducted a phase 2 clinical trial of sequential pembrolizumab x 3 followed by doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (AVD) chemotherapy (4-6 cycles) for newly diagnosed early unfavorable or advanced stage cHL. Interim response to single agent anti PD-1 therapy was assessed by PET-CT and by decline in metabolic tumor volume (MTV). We report the results of changes in cytokine levels and response to PD-1 blockade and survival outcomes following extended follow up of > 5 years. Methods: Levels of plasma soluble cytokines and other mediators including IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-13, IL-2, IDO, LAP, PDL1, TARC (CCL17), TNF-α, and Galectin-1 were measured by Luminex using ProcartaPlex kits (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All standards and samples were measured in duplicates pre-treatment, following single agent PEM, and after AVD. Pre-treatment diagnostic biopsy specimens were double stained for PD-L1 (E1L3N, XP Cell Signaling) and PAX5, and scored by two expert hematopathologists (QC LBS). Response by metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was defined as complete metabolic response (CMR), ≥ 90% reduction by MTV (near CMR; nCMR), or < 90% reduction by MTV (partial response; PR). Patients were categorized as excellent responders (CMR or nCMR) versus others (PR). Changes in biomarkers were calculated as percentage change from pre-treatment to post-pembrolizumab and from post-pembrolizumab to post-chemotherapy. Percentage changes were classified as increase (≥ 25%), decrease (≤ -25%), or stable. Comparisons between patients with PR versus CMR/nCMR were calculated with Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests. Additionally, we assessed levels of soluble PD-L1 as well as the relationship between baseline levels of cytokines and PDL-1 expression in Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells by H-score. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled from September 2017 through August 1, 2019. Response to single agent PD-1 was PR in 11 (36.7%), nCMR in 8 (26.7%), and CMR in 11 (36.7%). The updated median follow-up is 67.6 (range: 59.3-80.4) months. No patients have relapsed or died, for a PFS and OS of 100%. Twenty-eight patients had peripheral blood available for cytokine analysis. There was no association between baseline levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, TGF-β, IL-10, IL-13, Galectin-1, IDO, TARC, or soluble PDL-1 and response to single agent pembrolizumab. Following single agent pembrolizumab changes in cytokine levels by response (CMR/nCMR vs PR) showed that all PRs had stable or a decline in TNF-α, IFN-γ, TGF-β, IL-10, IL-13, and IDO levels. In contrast, among the 18 patients with CMR/nCMR variable increase in cytokines was observed: TNF-α increased in 1 pt (5.6%), IFN-γ increased in 6 pts (33%), TGF-β increased in 2 pts (11%), IL-10 increased in 3 pts (17%), and both IL-13 and IDO increased in 5 pts (28%). Following sequential chemotherapy there was no association between responses and cytokine alterations. Soluble PD-L1 was undetectable in 26/28 (93%) pts at one time point and in 18 pts at all three time points evaluated. On H-scoring there was no association with any of the cytokine's levels at baseline and PDL-1 expression in Reed Sternberg cells. Conclusions: Mature data with > 5 year median follow-up confirm that sequential pembrolizumab and AVD chemotherapy remains a highly effective treatment with 100% PFS and OS. Baseline cytokine levels were not predictive of outcomes. Patients with PRs to Pembrolizumab monotherapy uniformly had a decline in cytokine levels while most with excellent responses (CMR/nCMR) had variability with most cytokines declining and some increasing. Further investigation is required to understand the implications of these findings for pembrolizumab-based therapy in cHL.
Authors
- Reem Karmali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-4376)
- Jane N. Winter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-3305)
- Leo I. Gordon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-7064)
- Robert Eisner
- Pamela B. Allen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-3662)
- Robert Bayer
- Eric Mou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9865-4517)
- Ranjana H. Advani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-2292)
- Liron Barnea Slonim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-3281)
- Andrew M. Evens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-1824)
- Hatice Savas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-9630)
- Barbara Pro
- Latifa A. Bazzi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6886-3492)
- Bin Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6286-6227)
- Qing Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6229-8568)
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Northwestern Medicine (US)
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
- Columbia University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Blood
- Published
- 2024-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-208680
- Primary Topic
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00