Peripheral Blood CAR T-Cell Level Using a Clia-Validated Assay Is Prognostic for Treatment Response and Icans in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy targeting CD19 offers curative potential for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), but recurrence occurs in >50% of patients. CAR-T is also associated with serious toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). There have been discordant results across few earlier studies as to whether CAR-T expansion, as determined by longitudinal quantification of blood CAR-T levels, is a predictive biomarker for response to therapy and for therapy-associated complications (reviewed in Lionel & Neelapu, Blood Advances 2024). Differing results from these studies could be due to variation across CAR-T quantification assays and measurement time points as well as the combined use of different CAR-T products and lymphoma histologies in analyses. We analyzed a uniform cohort of LBCL patients treated with a single CAR-T product using a CLIA-validated flow cytometry assay at precise time points to establish the prognostic utility of CAR-T expansion and investigate the impact of different pre-treatment factors on CAR-T expansion kinetics. Methods: The study included all patients who received standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for LBCL at our institution starting in October 2022, when the flow cytometry assay was introduced, until January 2024, when pre-determined target of 100 patients was reached (54% second-line CAR-T vs. 46% later-line). Blood samples were obtained on alternate days from patients starting on day +1 after CAR-T infusion and continued for about two weeks. Subsequent measurements were performed weekly during the first month post-infusion. Blood CAR-T quantification was performed by a flow cytometry-based assay which was validated as per CLIA standards and utilized antibody targeting CD19-specific monoclonal antibody FMC63. CART cells were reported as absolute count using a dual platform (WBC by hematology counter). The primary response endpoint was disease status on PET/CT scan at 90 days after infusion. CRS and ICANS were graded as per the ASTCT system. Results: CAR-T expansion data was available from 100 patients with a median number of 9 measurements per patient (Q1-Q3 range 7-10). In the 81 patients who had data available from day+90 PET/CT scans, CAR-T levels were found to be significantly higher in the 58 responders (56 complete and 2 partial responses) compared to the 23 non-responders at days +5, +7 and +9 after infusion. Among these days, day+7 CAR-T levels had the most significant difference (p<0.001) and highest area under the curve. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis found day+7 CAR-T level of 30 cells/mL to be differentiating responders from non-responders (specificity 75%, sensitivity 77.8%). The day+7 CAR-T level continued to be significantly associated with response in a multivariate analysis incorporating other parameters at time of conditioning therapy including disease stage, LDH, IPI risk score and refractoriness to prior treatment. The day+7 CAR-T level was also significantly higher in patients with grade ≥3 ICANS (p<0.001) and correlated with increased use of systemic steroids for ICANS treatment (p<0.01) and need for critical care (p<0.01). By ROC analysis, day+7 CAR-T level of >134 cells/mL was associated with severe ICANS (specificity 81.7%, sensitivity 66.7%); day+7 level continued to be significantly associated with severe ICANS in a multivariate analysis. The association between grade ≥3 CRS and day+7 levels did not reach statistical significance. Several pre-treatment parameters were associated with higher day+7 CAR-T levels including fewer prior lines of therapy (second-line vs. later-line), absence of prior bendamustine exposure and the use of post-apheresis bridging therapy. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence for the prognostic utility of peripheral blood CAR-T levels measured by a CLIA-validated assay as an early biomarker to predict response to treatment and risk for severe ICANS after axi-cel therapy in patients with LBCL. This has implications for the future clinical use of real-time CAR-T kinetics using a flow cytometry-based assay that could be implemented at most centers to help identify patients who are likely to need additional intervention to improve efficacy of CAR-T therapy and optimization of management strategies for severe ICANS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-208300
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peripheral Blood CAR T-Cell Level Using a Clia-Validated Assay Is Prognostic for Treatment Response and Icans in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Luis Enrique Malpica Castillo, Gabriela Rondón, Sushanth Gouni, Maria Alma Rodriguez et al.
Blood
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Peripheral Blood CAR T-Cell Level Using a Clia-Validated Assay Is Prognostic for Treatment Response and Icans in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Luis Enrique Malpica Castillo, Gabriela Rondón, Sushanth Gouni, Maria Alma Rodriguez, Jason R. Westin, Ryan Sun, Hun Ju Lee, Fareed Khawaja, Swaminathan P. Iyer, Luis Fayad, Sairah Ahmed, Naishu Kui, Paolo Strati, Dai Chihara, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Eslam Aboismail, Amy A. Ayers, Sattva Swarup Neelapu, Ajlan Al Zaki, Frederick Hagemeister, Partow Kebriaei, Chijioke Nze, Sanjit O. Tewari, Anath C. Lionel, Christopher R. Flowers, Preetesh Jain, Sa A. Wang, Michael L. Wang, Cristina Gutiérrez, Ranjit Nair, Wei J. Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy targeting CD19 offers curative potential for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), but recurrence occurs in >50% of patients. CAR-T is also associated with serious toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). There have been discordant results across few earlier studies as to whether CAR-T expansion, as determined by longitudinal quantification of blood CAR-T levels, is a predictive biomarker for response to therapy and for therapy-associated complications (reviewed in Lionel & Neelapu, Blood Advances 2024). Differing results from these studies could be due to variation across CAR-T quantification assays and measurement time points as well as the combined use of different CAR-T products and lymphoma histologies in analyses. We analyzed a uniform cohort of LBCL patients treated with a single CAR-T product using a CLIA-validated flow cytometry assay at precise time points to establish the prognostic utility of CAR-T expansion and investigate the impact of different pre-treatment factors on CAR-T expansion kinetics. Methods: The study included all patients who received standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for LBCL at our institution starting in October 2022, when the flow cytometry assay was introduced, until January 2024, when pre-determined target of 100 patients was reached (54% second-line CAR-T vs. 46% later-line). Blood samples were obtained on alternate days from patients starting on day +1 after CAR-T infusion and continued for about two weeks. Subsequent measurements were performed weekly during the first month post-infusion. Blood CAR-T quantification was performed by a flow cytometry-based assay which was validated as per CLIA standards and utilized antibody targeting CD19-specific monoclonal antibody FMC63. CART cells were reported as absolute count using a dual platform (WBC by hematology counter). The primary response endpoint was disease status on PET/CT scan at 90 days after infusion. CRS and ICANS were graded as per the ASTCT system. Results: CAR-T expansion data was available from 100 patients with a median number of 9 measurements per patient (Q1-Q3 range 7-10). In the 81 patients who had data available from day+90 PET/CT scans, CAR-T levels were found to be significantly higher in the 58 responders (56 complete and 2 partial responses) compared to the 23 non-responders at days +5, +7 and +9 after infusion. Among these days, day+7 CAR-T levels had the most significant difference (p<0.001) and highest area under the curve. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis found day+7 CAR-T level of 30 cells/mL to be differentiating responders from non-responders (specificity 75%, sensitivity 77.8%). The day+7 CAR-T level continued to be significantly associated with response in a multivariate analysis incorporating other parameters at time of conditioning therapy including disease stage, LDH, IPI risk score and refractoriness to prior treatment. The day+7 CAR-T level was also significantly higher in patients with grade ≥3 ICANS (p<0.001) and correlated with increased use of systemic steroids for ICANS treatment (p<0.01) and need for critical care (p<0.01). By ROC analysis, day+7 CAR-T level of >134 cells/mL was associated with severe ICANS (specificity 81.7%, sensitivity 66.7%); day+7 level continued to be significantly associated with severe ICANS in a multivariate analysis. The association between grade ≥3 CRS and day+7 levels did not reach statistical significance. Several pre-treatment parameters were associated with higher day+7 CAR-T levels including fewer prior lines of therapy (second-line vs. later-line), absence of prior bendamustine exposure and the use of post-apheresis bridging therapy. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence for the prognostic utility of peripheral blood CAR-T levels measured by a CLIA-validated assay as an early biomarker to predict response to treatment and risk for severe ICANS after axi-cel therapy in patients with LBCL. This has implications for the future clinical use of real-time CAR-T kinetics using a flow cytometry-based assay that could be implemented at most centers to help identify patients who are likely to need additional intervention to improve efficacy of CAR-T therapy and optimization of management strategies for severe ICANS.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, TG Therapeutics, bluebird bio, BeiGene, Incyte, Seagen, Astellas Pharma, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Ono Pharmaceutical, MorphoSys, Ipsen, National Institutes of Health, Genentech, EMD Serono, Pharmacyclics, Juno Therapeutics, National Cancer Institute, Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.