Impact of Absolute Lymphocyte Count at Pre-Apheresis and Pre-Lymphodepletion on Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Therapy Outcomes in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Introduction/Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells targeting BCMA have shown high response rates and durable remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Since this innovative therapy leverages the patient's own immune system, T cell fitness prior to CAR-T therapy is increasingly important. Acceptable thresholds for absolute lymphocyte count prior to apheresis which have prognostic impact are not clearly defined. This real-world analysis investigated pre-apheresis (A) and pre-lymphodepletion (LD) ALC, and the ALC reduction between A and LD, on survival outcomes post CAR-T for RRMM. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective analysis of patients with RRMM who received commercial BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) between August 2021 and May 2023. We assessed the impact of Pre-A and Pre-LD ALC as well as the reduction in ALC (measured as the difference between pre-LD and pre-A ALC) on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Cox proportional hazard models. Result: Of the 54 patients included, 63% (n=34) received ide-cel and 38% (n=20) received cilta-cel. The median age was 65 years (range, 41-86) and 61% were male. Revised international staging system (R-ISS) stages I/ II/ III were 24% /41% /13%, respectively. 49% (n=26) had extramedullary disease (EMD) present and 56% (n=30) had at least 1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality by FISH. Patients received a median of 8 (range, 1-20) prior lines of therapy, and 72% (n=38) received bridging therapy. 38% (n=20) had penta-refractory disease. The median pre-A and pre-LD ALC was 0.8×109/L (range, 0.1-2.2) and 0.8×109/L (range, 0.1-3.1), respectively. The median absolute reduction in ALC was 0.1×109/L (range, -2.8-1.0). Using the lowest quartiles as cutoffs, we defined low pre-A ALC as ≤ 0.5 ×109/L, while a high reduction between pre-A and pre-LD ALC was defined as ≥ 0.1 ×109/L based on the highest quartiles. Compared to patients with high pre-A ALC, those with low pre-A ALC received more bridging therapy (87% vs. 66%) and had a higher incidence of high-risk cytogenetics (73% vs. 49%). In contrast, patients with low and high pre-LD ALC were more balanced in terms of bridging therapy (76% vs. 69%) and high-risk cytogenetics (both 56%). The median follow-up time from CAR-T infusion was 18months. Low pre-A ALC was associated with significantly inferior PFS in univariable analysis (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.04-4.19, p=0.038); this difference remained significant in multivariable analysis (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.02-4.31, p=0.044) along with 1p deletion (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.07-6.02, p=0.034) and EMD (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.19-5.30, p=0.015). Additionally, low pre-A ALC was significantly associated with inferior OS in univariable analysis (HR 6.40, 95% CI 2.48-16.5, p<0.001), and remained a poor prognostic factor for OS in multivariable analysis (HR 6.59, 95% CI 2.44-18.8, p<0.001) along with EMD (HR 4.31, 95% CI 1.28-14.5, p=0.018). Neither pre-LD ALC nor a high absolute reduction in ALC showed significant differences in PFS, while pre-LD ALC was significantly associated with worse OS only in the univariable setting without significance in multivariable analysis. No correlation was observed between pre-A ALC and rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), however, CRS was significantly more frequently noted in patients with low pre-LD ALC. Conclusion: In this small real-world analysis, results suggest that the pre-apheresis ALC <0.5 ×109/L may be an independent poor prognostic factor on PFS and OS in RRMM treated with CAR-T cell therapy and low pre-LD ALC may predict higher incidence of CRS after CAR-T infusion. Further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal timing of apheresis in patients with low pre-ALC in a larger cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-208490
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Absolute Lymphocyte Count at Pre-Apheresis and Pre-Lymphodepletion on Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Therapy Outcomes in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Heather Jolie Landau, Kylee H. Maclachlan, Hamza Hashmi, Saad Z. Usmani et al.
Blood
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Impact of Absolute Lymphocyte Count at Pre-Apheresis and Pre-Lymphodepletion on Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Therapy Outcomes in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Heather Jolie Landau, Kylee H. Maclachlan, Hamza Hashmi, Saad Z. Usmani, Samantha Brown, Malin L. Hultcrantz, Tasmin Farzana, Gunjan L. Shah, Urvi Ashok Shah, Alexander M. Lesokhin, Roni Shouval, Hani Hassoun, Karthik Nath, Michael Scordo, Eric Matthew Jurgens, David J. Chung, Sham Mailankody, Noriko Nishimura, Neha Korde, Sridevi Rajeeve, Bruno Almeida Costa, Sergio A. Giralt, Carlyn Rose C. Tan, Ross Firestone, Sean Devlin
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells targeting BCMA have shown high response rates and durable remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Since this innovative therapy leverages the patient's own immune system, T cell fitness prior to CAR-T therapy is increasingly important. Acceptable thresholds for absolute lymphocyte count prior to apheresis which have prognostic impact are not clearly defined. This real-world analysis investigated pre-apheresis (A) and pre-lymphodepletion (LD) ALC, and the ALC reduction between A and LD, on survival outcomes post CAR-T for RRMM. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective analysis of patients with RRMM who received commercial BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) between August 2021 and May 2023. We assessed the impact of Pre-A and Pre-LD ALC as well as the reduction in ALC (measured as the difference between pre-LD and pre-A ALC) on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Cox proportional hazard models. Result: Of the 54 patients included, 63% (n=34) received ide-cel and 38% (n=20) received cilta-cel. The median age was 65 years (range, 41-86) and 61% were male. Revised international staging system (R-ISS) stages I/ II/ III were 24% /41% /13%, respectively. 49% (n=26) had extramedullary disease (EMD) present and 56% (n=30) had at least 1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality by FISH. Patients received a median of 8 (range, 1-20) prior lines of therapy, and 72% (n=38) received bridging therapy. 38% (n=20) had penta-refractory disease. The median pre-A and pre-LD ALC was 0.8×109/L (range, 0.1-2.2) and 0.8×109/L (range, 0.1-3.1), respectively. The median absolute reduction in ALC was 0.1×109/L (range, -2.8-1.0). Using the lowest quartiles as cutoffs, we defined low pre-A ALC as ≤ 0.5 ×109/L, while a high reduction between pre-A and pre-LD ALC was defined as ≥ 0.1 ×109/L based on the highest quartiles. Compared to patients with high pre-A ALC, those with low pre-A ALC received more bridging therapy (87% vs. 66%) and had a higher incidence of high-risk cytogenetics (73% vs. 49%). In contrast, patients with low and high pre-LD ALC were more balanced in terms of bridging therapy (76% vs. 69%) and high-risk cytogenetics (both 56%). The median follow-up time from CAR-T infusion was 18months. Low pre-A ALC was associated with significantly inferior PFS in univariable analysis (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.04-4.19, p=0.038); this difference remained significant in multivariable analysis (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.02-4.31, p=0.044) along with 1p deletion (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.07-6.02, p=0.034) and EMD (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.19-5.30, p=0.015). Additionally, low pre-A ALC was significantly associated with inferior OS in univariable analysis (HR 6.40, 95% CI 2.48-16.5, p<0.001), and remained a poor prognostic factor for OS in multivariable analysis (HR 6.59, 95% CI 2.44-18.8, p<0.001) along with EMD (HR 4.31, 95% CI 1.28-14.5, p=0.018). Neither pre-LD ALC nor a high absolute reduction in ALC showed significant differences in PFS, while pre-LD ALC was significantly associated with worse OS only in the univariable setting without significance in multivariable analysis. No correlation was observed between pre-A ALC and rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), however, CRS was significantly more frequently noted in patients with low pre-LD ALC. Conclusion: In this small real-world analysis, results suggest that the pre-apheresis ALC <0.5 ×109/L may be an independent poor prognostic factor on PFS and OS in RRMM treated with CAR-T cell therapy and low pre-LD ALC may predict higher incidence of CRS after CAR-T infusion. Further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal timing of apheresis in patients with low pre-ALC in a larger cohort.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.