Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Odronextamab in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Pooled Analysis from the ELM-1 and ELM-2 Studies

Introduction Odronextamab, a novel, investigational, CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, has demonstrated compelling efficacy and a generally manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the CAR-T-naïve and post-CAR-T therapy settings (Ayyappan S et al. ASH 2023; Crombie J et al. ASH 2023). Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety data for odronextamab from a pooled analysis of the DLBCL post-CAR-T cohort in the ELM-1 study (NCT02290951), which was the only pivotal study of a bispecific antibody with a prespecified cohort dedicated to this population, and the CAR-T-naïve DLBCL cohort in the ELM-2 study (NCT03888105). Methods Odronextamab was administered intravenously in 21-day cycles. A step-up dosing regimen with steroid prophylaxis was employed during Cycle 1, followed by 160 mg on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 2-4. Maintenance therapy consisted of 320 mg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with durable complete response (CR) for ≥9 months transitioned to dosing every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR) using the Lugano classification. Key secondary endpoints included CR rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results The analysis set consisted of a pooled population of 187 patients with R/R DLBCL from ELM-1 (n=60; data cutoff date of January 22, 2024) and ELM-2 (n=127; data cutoff date October 20, 2023). Median duration of follow-up was 23.0 months. Median age was 65.0 years (range 24-88), 61.5% of patients were male, 78.6% had Ann Arbor stage III-IV, 56.7% had an IPI score ≥3, and the median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 2-9). The 60 patients included from ELM-1 had all received prior CAR-T therapy, representing 32.1% of the total pooled population (60/187), and of these, 48.3% (29/60) had relapsed within ≤90 days of initiating CAR-T therapy, and 71.7% (43/60) had CAR-T-refractory disease. Overall, 83.4% of the pooled population had disease that was refractory to the last line of therapy. Median duration of odronextamab exposure was 14.7 weeks; 91.4% (171/187) of the population completed ≥1 cycle, and 59.4% (111/187) completed ≥4 cycles. ORR and CR rate confirmed by ICR were 50.8% (95/187) and 31.6% (59/187), respectively, and were generally consistent across multiple high-risk subgroups, including the post-CAR-T therapy subgroup. Median DOR was 10.5 months (95% CI 5.4-24.8) and median duration of CR was 36.3 months (95% CI 12.4-not evaluable); the probability of maintaining CR for 36 months was 51.0%. The probability of PFS and OS at 36 months was 17.5% and 27.0%, respectively. Safety was generally consistent with previous reports. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (>30% all grades) were cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 52.9%), anemia (35.8%), pyrexia (39.6%), and neutropenia (31.6%). Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 25 patients (13.4%). With the optimized 0.7/4/20 mg step-up regimen (n=100), 48.0% of patients (48/100) had CRS events that were Grade (Gr) 1/2, and one Gr 3 CRS event (confounded by pancreatitis) was reported. All CRS events resolved with supportive measures. No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome events were reported with the 0.7/4/20 mg step-up regimen. Gr ≥3 infections occurred in 46 patients (24.6%; Gr 5, n=16 [8.6%]). COVID-19 infections were reported in 30 patients (16.0%), of which Gr 5 was reported in 6 patients (3.2%). Conclusions This pooled analysis of patients with R/R DLBCL from the ELM-1 and ELM-2 studies, which represents the largest dataset reported for a bispecific antibody in the third-line or later setting, confirms that with longer follow-up the recommended odronextamab dose retains highly encouraging efficacy. Responses were durable, with a 51% probability of maintaining CR for 3 years. The safety profile was generally consistent with earlier reports and CRS events with the 0.7/4/20 mg step-up dosing regimen were predominantly low grade and generally manageable. Importantly, continued treatment with odronextamab demonstrated no detrimental effects on survival outcomes over a longer follow-up period. Odronextamab may be an important potential option in future management of R/R DLBCL, and Phase 3 trials are ongoing. Updated data will be presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-199980
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Odronextamab in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Pooled Analysis from the ELM-1 and ELM-2 Studies

Dina M. Flink, Jon Arnason, Srikanth Ambati, John Nathan Allan et al.
6 citations
Blood
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
2.55
article

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Odronextamab in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Pooled Analysis from the ELM-1 and ELM-2 Studies

Dina M. Flink, Jon Arnason, Srikanth Ambati, John Nathan Allan, Hesham Mohamed, Matthew J. Matasar, Jan Walewski, Jennifer Leigh Crombie, Max S. Topp, Tae Min Kim, Yuan Cheng, Won-Seog Kim, Aafia Chaudhry, Bertha Fearon Chalet
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Introduction Odronextamab, a novel, investigational, CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, has demonstrated compelling efficacy and a generally manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the CAR-T-naïve and post-CAR-T therapy settings (Ayyappan S et al. ASH 2023; Crombie J et al. ASH 2023). Here, we report long-term efficacy and safety data for odronextamab from a pooled analysis of the DLBCL post-CAR-T cohort in the ELM-1 study (NCT02290951), which was the only pivotal study of a bispecific antibody with a prespecified cohort dedicated to this population, and the CAR-T-naïve DLBCL cohort in the ELM-2 study (NCT03888105). Methods Odronextamab was administered intravenously in 21-day cycles. A step-up dosing regimen with steroid prophylaxis was employed during Cycle 1, followed by 160 mg on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycles 2-4. Maintenance therapy consisted of 320 mg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with durable complete response (CR) for ≥9 months transitioned to dosing every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR) using the Lugano classification. Key secondary endpoints included CR rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results The analysis set consisted of a pooled population of 187 patients with R/R DLBCL from ELM-1 (n=60; data cutoff date of January 22, 2024) and ELM-2 (n=127; data cutoff date October 20, 2023). Median duration of follow-up was 23.0 months. Median age was 65.0 years (range 24-88), 61.5% of patients were male, 78.6% had Ann Arbor stage III-IV, 56.7% had an IPI score ≥3, and the median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 2-9). The 60 patients included from ELM-1 had all received prior CAR-T therapy, representing 32.1% of the total pooled population (60/187), and of these, 48.3% (29/60) had relapsed within ≤90 days of initiating CAR-T therapy, and 71.7% (43/60) had CAR-T-refractory disease. Overall, 83.4% of the pooled population had disease that was refractory to the last line of therapy. Median duration of odronextamab exposure was 14.7 weeks; 91.4% (171/187) of the population completed ≥1 cycle, and 59.4% (111/187) completed ≥4 cycles. ORR and CR rate confirmed by ICR were 50.8% (95/187) and 31.6% (59/187), respectively, and were generally consistent across multiple high-risk subgroups, including the post-CAR-T therapy subgroup. Median DOR was 10.5 months (95% CI 5.4-24.8) and median duration of CR was 36.3 months (95% CI 12.4-not evaluable); the probability of maintaining CR for 36 months was 51.0%. The probability of PFS and OS at 36 months was 17.5% and 27.0%, respectively. Safety was generally consistent with previous reports. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (>30% all grades) were cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 52.9%), anemia (35.8%), pyrexia (39.6%), and neutropenia (31.6%). Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 25 patients (13.4%). With the optimized 0.7/4/20 mg step-up regimen (n=100), 48.0% of patients (48/100) had CRS events that were Grade (Gr) 1/2, and one Gr 3 CRS event (confounded by pancreatitis) was reported. All CRS events resolved with supportive measures. No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome events were reported with the 0.7/4/20 mg step-up regimen. Gr ≥3 infections occurred in 46 patients (24.6%; Gr 5, n=16 [8.6%]). COVID-19 infections were reported in 30 patients (16.0%), of which Gr 5 was reported in 6 patients (3.2%). Conclusions This pooled analysis of patients with R/R DLBCL from the ELM-1 and ELM-2 studies, which represents the largest dataset reported for a bispecific antibody in the third-line or later setting, confirms that with longer follow-up the recommended odronextamab dose retains highly encouraging efficacy. Responses were durable, with a 51% probability of maintaining CR for 3 years. The safety profile was generally consistent with earlier reports and CRS events with the 0.7/4/20 mg step-up dosing regimen were predominantly low grade and generally manageable. Importantly, continued treatment with odronextamab demonstrated no detrimental effects on survival outcomes over a longer follow-up period. Odronextamab may be an important potential option in future management of R/R DLBCL, and Phase 3 trials are ongoing. Updated data will be presented.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Regeneron (United States) (US), Cornell University (US), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Vanda Pharmaceuticals, TG Therapeutics, BeiGene, Incyte, Yuhan, Seagen, MorphoSys, Genentech, Samsung, Pharmacyclics, Daiichi Sankyo Europe, Cilag
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.