Outcomes of Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-GemOx: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
Background: Rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) is a commonly utilized chemoimmunotherapy regimen for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), especially for patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR T). R-GemOx is used as a comparator arm in several active phase III clinical trials for R/R DLBCL, including the POLARGO (polatuzumab vedotion and R-GemOx), STARGLO (glofitamab and GemOx), SUNMO (mosunetuzumab and polatuzumab vedotin), LOTIS-5 (loncastuximab tesirine and rituximab), and EPCORE DLBCL-1 (epcoritamab) studies. However, real-world data are limited to understand the patterns of use and outcomes of R-GemOx in the US. Methods: We developed a retrospective multicenter US cohort (known as LEO CReWE) of patients with R/R DLBCL and other aggressive B-cell lymphomas at the eight US academic centers participating in the LEO Cohort Study (NCT02736357). Patients first diagnosed with DLBCL (including transformed and high-grade B-cell lymphoma) from 2007 - 2022 who received second line (2L) or later therapy for R/R DLBCL with R-GemOx were included. Baseline characteristics, treatment, and follow-up data were abstracted by chart review. Index line of therapy was defined as the first receipt of R-GemOx therapy in the 2L or later setting. Intent for CAR T and/or ASCT was evaluated at each line of therapy based on medical records at the time of treatment initiation. Subgroup analyses were pre-planned in groups of special interest, including those treated with R-GemOx without intent for ASCT or CAR T, those treated as a bridge to CAR T, and those aged 70 and older. Results: 183 patients with R/R DLBCL treated with R-GemOx were included. At time of initiation of R-GemOx, median age was 68 years (range 21-88), with 71 patients (39%) aged 70+ and 18 (10%) aged 80+. Many patients had high risk features including 13% with high grade B-cell lymphoma and 56% with IPI 3 or greater. 21% had an ECOG performance status of 2 or greater. Patients received a median of 2 lines of therapy prior to the index line of R-GemOx (range 1-7). 52% of patients did not achieve a complete response (CR) to first-line therapy, and 20% relapsed <12 months from an initial CR. In all patients receiving R-GemOx, the overall response rate (ORR) was 45% (29% CR). At a median follow-up of 39 months, median EFS was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.2), with 12-month EFS of 21% and a 24-month EFS of 15%. Median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 9.6-18.1), with a 12-month OS of 52% and a 24-month OS of 38%. In patients treated without intent for ASCT or CAR T, ORR was 33% (18% CR). Median EFS was 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.6-2.5) with 12- and 24-month EFS of 14% and 9%, respectively. Median OS was 9.5 months (95% CI: 6.6-16.1) with 12- and 24-month OS of 45% and 29%, respectively. In patients receiving R-GemOx as bridging to ASCT or CAR T, ORR was 57% (35% CR). 35% received CAR T and 14% received ASCT, while the remainder did not receive the intended therapy as part of this line. Median EFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 1.8-5.2) with 12- and 24-month EFS of 28% and 25%, respectively. Median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI: 13.4-NR); 12- and 24-month OS were 61% and 50%, respectively. In patients aged 70+, ORR was 53% (33% CR). Median EFS was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.6-5.2), with 12- and 24-month EFS of 20% and 18%, respectively. Median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI: 8.6-30.2); 12- and 24-month OS were 57% and 39%, respectively. Conclusion: This study represents the largest reported cohort of patients treated with R-GemOx in US academic centers to date. The ORR of 45% and CR rate of 29% CR, as well as median EFS and OS of 2.3 and 13.5 months, respectively, are consistent with findings from previous phase II studies; these results highlight that responses to R-GemOx are not durable and the vast majority of patients require additional therapy. This study demonstrates real-world evidence of the efficacy of R-GemOx in a large cohort of patients with R/R DLBCL from the US over a long period, including both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients, and patients treated in the CAR T era. These data aid in providing a benchmark for active clinical trials in the rapidly evolving landscape of R/R DLBCL therapies and allow potential comparison to a real-world cohort of patients with a broad range of clinical characteristics.
Authors
- Jonathon Brett Cohen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2723-6481)
- David J. Fox (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3781-5188)
- Sara Haddadi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4909-3541)
- Thomas Matthew Habermann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-9132)
- Loretta J. Nastoupil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6071-8610)
- Peter Martin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-1551)
- Connie Lee Batlevi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9036-9463)
- Anthony Masaquel
- Izidore S. Lossos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-9013)
- Dai Chihara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1153-2294)
- Matthew J. Maurer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1867-0526)
- Grzegorz S. Nowakowski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-9393)
- Ashwini Shewade
- Amy A. Ayers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-2356)
- Michele Stanchina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4691-7645)
- Brad S. Kahl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0459-6609)
- Arushi Khurana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-0949)
- James R. Cerhan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-178X)
- Christopher R. Flowers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-3990)
- Brian K. Link (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-0698)
- Jean Louise Koff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4414-0489)
- Samuel Yamshon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-8568)
- Tanner W. Reicks
- Umar Farooq (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-9891)
- Yucai Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1576-8341)
- Carla Casulo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9993-5065)
- Melissa C. Larson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5430-8161)
- Jia Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-0034)
- Yong Mun
- Andrea Lo‐Rossi
Institutions
- University of Iowa (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- WinnMed (US)
- Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Blood
- Published
- 2024-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-208111
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.42
Funders
- Amgen
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Eli Lilly and Company
- AstraZeneca
- Roche
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
- Gilead Sciences
- Celgene
- University of Miami
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
- Karyopharm Therapeutics
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- TG Therapeutics
- MEI Pharma
- Constellation Pharmaceuticals
- BeiGene
- Incyte
- Moderna
- Seagen
- Ono Pharmaceutical
- MorphoSys
- Ipsen
- Genentech
- EMD Serono
- Kite Pharma
- Pharmacyclics
- Loxo Oncology
- National Cancer Institute
- Janssen Pharmaceuticals
- Daiichi Sankyo Europe