Leader selection based Multi-Objective Flow Direction Algorithm (MOFDA): A novel approach for engineering design problems

• Introduces Multi-Objective Flow Direction Algorithm (MOFDA) for real-world engineering design problems. • Extends the success of Flow Direction Algorithm (FDA) to multi-objective optimization (MOO) tasks. • Employs innovative mechanisms including a fixed-size external archive and a grid mechanism for Pareto optimal solutions. • Outperforms well-known intelligent algorithms like MOPSO, MOGWO, and MOMVO across 25 diverse problems. • Demonstrates superior convergence and broad coverage on standard tests, validating MOFDA's effectiveness in addressing MOO challenges. Addressing complex real-world issues with conflicting objectives is a significant challenge in optimization. Practical algorithms must balance these objectives, mainly when decision-maker preferences are unclear. This paper introduces a multi-objective adaptation of the Flow Direction Algorithm (FDA) to address the shortcomings of traditional evolutionary and meta-heuristic optimization methods in multi-objective optimization (MOO). These conventional methods often fail to find Pareto optimal solutions and to represent all objectives fairly. Building on the FDA's success in single-objective tasks, we expanded its application to MOO, creating the Multi-Objective Flow Direction Algorithm (MOFDA). MOFDA incorporates new mechanisms to accurately and uniformly find optimal solutions for MOO challenges. It features a fixed-size external archive to maintain Pareto optimal solutions, uses a grid mechanism to improve non-dominated solutions within this archive, and implements a leader selection process to guide searches in the multi-objective space. These strategies enable MOFDA to discover superior solutions and ensure extensive coverage of the Pareto front. We validated MOFDA's effectiveness by testing it against 27 diverse problems using seven performance metrics. The results show MOFDA's ability to outperform well-known algorithms, achieving significant convergence and broad coverage, thus demonstrating its advanced capability in multi-objective optimization. The MOFDA source code is available at: https://nimakhodadadi.com/algorithms-%2B-codes .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103670
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leader selection based Multi-Objective Flow Direction Algorithm (MOFDA): A novel approach for engineering design problems

Hojat Karami, Laith Abualigah, Mohammad H. Nadimi-Shahraki, Nima Khodadadi et al.
19 citations
Results in Engineering
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
6.87
article

Leader selection based Multi-Objective Flow Direction Algorithm (MOFDA): A novel approach for engineering design problems

Hojat Karami, Laith Abualigah, Mohammad H. Nadimi-Shahraki, Nima Khodadadi, Seyedali Mirjalili, Mohammad Ehteram
article en
19 citations

Abstract

• Introduces Multi-Objective Flow Direction Algorithm (MOFDA) for real-world engineering design problems. • Extends the success of Flow Direction Algorithm (FDA) to multi-objective optimization (MOO) tasks. • Employs innovative mechanisms including a fixed-size external archive and a grid mechanism for Pareto optimal solutions. • Outperforms well-known intelligent algorithms like MOPSO, MOGWO, and MOMVO across 25 diverse problems. • Demonstrates superior convergence and broad coverage on standard tests, validating MOFDA's effectiveness in addressing MOO challenges. Addressing complex real-world issues with conflicting objectives is a significant challenge in optimization. Practical algorithms must balance these objectives, mainly when decision-maker preferences are unclear. This paper introduces a multi-objective adaptation of the Flow Direction Algorithm (FDA) to address the shortcomings of traditional evolutionary and meta-heuristic optimization methods in multi-objective optimization (MOO). These conventional methods often fail to find Pareto optimal solutions and to represent all objectives fairly. Building on the FDA's success in single-objective tasks, we expanded its application to MOO, creating the Multi-Objective Flow Direction Algorithm (MOFDA). MOFDA incorporates new mechanisms to accurately and uniformly find optimal solutions for MOO challenges. It features a fixed-size external archive to maintain Pareto optimal solutions, uses a grid mechanism to improve non-dominated solutions within this archive, and implements a leader selection process to guide searches in the multi-objective space. These strategies enable MOFDA to discover superior solutions and ensure extensive coverage of the Pareto front. We validated MOFDA's effectiveness by testing it against 27 diverse problems using seven performance metrics. The results show MOFDA's ability to outperform well-known algorithms, achieving significant convergence and broad coverage, thus demonstrating its advanced capability in multi-objective optimization. The MOFDA source code is available at: https://nimakhodadadi.com/algorithms-%2B-codes .

Results in EngineeringVol. 25
Obuda University (HU), VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ), Amman Arab University (JO), University of Miami (US), Skyline University College (AE), Torrens University Australia (AU), Islamic Azad University of Najafabad (IR), Semnan University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.