Encouraging Efficacy of Bexmarilimab with Azacitidine in Relapsed or Refractory MDS in Bexmab Ph1/2 Study

Introduction Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with primary refractory disease or relapse after frontline treatment (r/r MDS) represents a high unmet medical need. Hypomethylating (HMA) agents, including azacitidine, are used in the frontline setting for higher-risk (HR) MDS patients with response rate reported as 16%1. After HMA-failure, the median overall survival (mOS) is poor, with 5.6 months.2 Bexmarilimab, a macrophage checkpoint inhibitor, blocks Common lymphatic and vascular endothelial receptor-1 (Clever-1) to enhance macrophage antigen presentation and T cell activation. In myeloid malignancies, Clever-1 is also abundant on myeloid blasts. Pre-clinical data suggests that by blocking Clever-1 on blasts, bexmarilimab hampers the energy production of the malignant cells, allowing enhanced killing of generally resistant blasts by cytotoxic agents, such as HMAs. Thus, bexmarilimab may alter the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment making the blasts susceptible to other available therapies, thereby enhancing their effectiveness in patients with MDS, including r/r MDS. Methods As of 15 May 2024, 14 patients with r/r MDS were enrolled in the ongoing Phase 1 dose escalation and Phase 2 dose optimization of the BEXMAB study (NCT05428969). All patients had IPSS-R >3.5 and 7/14 were TP53 mutated. Bexmarilimab was administrated weekly in 28-day cycles, at 1,3, and 6 mg/kg, in combination with a standard regimen of azacitidine (75 mg/m2 D1-7 each cycle). Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design was used for dose escalation and r/r MDS was selected as the population for dose optimization and expansion following a Simon's 2-stage design. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of bexmarilimab plus azacitidine. BM was evaluated at the end of Cycles 1, 3 and then every third cycle for response and exploratory biomarkers. Results Altogether, 113 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported, of which 74 (65%) were grade 1-2. Seventeen serious adverse events (SAE) were reported from 7 r/r MDS patients, with febrile neutropenia as most frequent event (n=9). Four bexmarilimab-related events were reported from 3 r/r MDS patients (fever, infusion related reaction, intermittent nausea and peripheral edema), all grade 1. The objective response rate (ORR) was 79% in r/r MDS patients (11/14). The responses consisted of 1 complete remission (CR), 7 marrow CRs (mCR), 1 partial response (PR) and 2 hematological improvements (HI). In addition, 2 responses of stable disease (SD) and 1 progressive disease (PD) were reported. Clinical activity was observed across all dose levels. Two patients proceeded to allogenic stem cell transplantation. The current median overall survival estimate (mOS) for the 14 Phase 1 r/r MDS patients is 13.4 months. Supporting our hypothesis of modulation of the BM microenvironment, the expression of human leukocyte antigen DR isotype (HLA-DR), was increased up to 6-fold on BM monocytes upon treatment. In addition, the number of CD4 and CD8 T cells was increased in the BM compared to baseline in 50% and 75% of patients, respectively. Both HLA-DR and T cell increases were observed in most patients after one treatment cycle. For further insight on the MoA of bexmarilimab plus azacitidine in r/r MDS, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of pre- and post-treatment (Cycle 1 and 3) BM samples is ongoing. Preliminary data suggest significant changes in the expression of genes related to blast cell energy production and macrophage activity induced by bexmarilimab and azacitidine treatment. Conclusions Bexmarilimab plus azacitidine is well tolerated and results in promising clinical efficacy in r/r MDS patients after HMA failure. 1 Hasegawa et al. Azacitidine Monotherapy in Patients With Treatment-Naïve Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023. 2 Prébet et al. Outcome of High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Azacitidine Treatment Failure. J Clin Onc. 2011.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-206804
Citations
1
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encouraging Efficacy of Bexmarilimab with Azacitidine in Relapsed or Refractory MDS in Bexmab Ph1/2 Study

Timo Siitonen, Marja Pyörälä, Anthony S. Stein, Birge Berns et al.
1 citations
Blood
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
0.39
article

Encouraging Efficacy of Bexmarilimab with Azacitidine in Relapsed or Refractory MDS in Bexmab Ph1/2 Study

Timo Siitonen, Marja Pyörälä, Anthony S. Stein, Birge Berns, Rita Turpin, Johanna Rimpiläinen, Naval Guastad Daver, Jenna H. Rannikko, Mika Kontro, Inka Pawlitzky, Maija Hollmén, Sofia Aakko, Amer M. Zeidan, Jesper Mickos, Milja Hakoniemi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with primary refractory disease or relapse after frontline treatment (r/r MDS) represents a high unmet medical need. Hypomethylating (HMA) agents, including azacitidine, are used in the frontline setting for higher-risk (HR) MDS patients with response rate reported as 16%1. After HMA-failure, the median overall survival (mOS) is poor, with 5.6 months.2 Bexmarilimab, a macrophage checkpoint inhibitor, blocks Common lymphatic and vascular endothelial receptor-1 (Clever-1) to enhance macrophage antigen presentation and T cell activation. In myeloid malignancies, Clever-1 is also abundant on myeloid blasts. Pre-clinical data suggests that by blocking Clever-1 on blasts, bexmarilimab hampers the energy production of the malignant cells, allowing enhanced killing of generally resistant blasts by cytotoxic agents, such as HMAs. Thus, bexmarilimab may alter the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment making the blasts susceptible to other available therapies, thereby enhancing their effectiveness in patients with MDS, including r/r MDS. Methods As of 15 May 2024, 14 patients with r/r MDS were enrolled in the ongoing Phase 1 dose escalation and Phase 2 dose optimization of the BEXMAB study (NCT05428969). All patients had IPSS-R >3.5 and 7/14 were TP53 mutated. Bexmarilimab was administrated weekly in 28-day cycles, at 1,3, and 6 mg/kg, in combination with a standard regimen of azacitidine (75 mg/m2 D1-7 each cycle). Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design was used for dose escalation and r/r MDS was selected as the population for dose optimization and expansion following a Simon's 2-stage design. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of bexmarilimab plus azacitidine. BM was evaluated at the end of Cycles 1, 3 and then every third cycle for response and exploratory biomarkers. Results Altogether, 113 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported, of which 74 (65%) were grade 1-2. Seventeen serious adverse events (SAE) were reported from 7 r/r MDS patients, with febrile neutropenia as most frequent event (n=9). Four bexmarilimab-related events were reported from 3 r/r MDS patients (fever, infusion related reaction, intermittent nausea and peripheral edema), all grade 1. The objective response rate (ORR) was 79% in r/r MDS patients (11/14). The responses consisted of 1 complete remission (CR), 7 marrow CRs (mCR), 1 partial response (PR) and 2 hematological improvements (HI). In addition, 2 responses of stable disease (SD) and 1 progressive disease (PD) were reported. Clinical activity was observed across all dose levels. Two patients proceeded to allogenic stem cell transplantation. The current median overall survival estimate (mOS) for the 14 Phase 1 r/r MDS patients is 13.4 months. Supporting our hypothesis of modulation of the BM microenvironment, the expression of human leukocyte antigen DR isotype (HLA-DR), was increased up to 6-fold on BM monocytes upon treatment. In addition, the number of CD4 and CD8 T cells was increased in the BM compared to baseline in 50% and 75% of patients, respectively. Both HLA-DR and T cell increases were observed in most patients after one treatment cycle. For further insight on the MoA of bexmarilimab plus azacitidine in r/r MDS, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of pre- and post-treatment (Cycle 1 and 3) BM samples is ongoing. Preliminary data suggest significant changes in the expression of genes related to blast cell energy production and macrophage activity induced by bexmarilimab and azacitidine treatment. Conclusions Bexmarilimab plus azacitidine is well tolerated and results in promising clinical efficacy in r/r MDS patients after HMA failure. 1 Hasegawa et al. Azacitidine Monotherapy in Patients With Treatment-Naïve Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023. 2 Prébet et al. Outcome of High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Azacitidine Treatment Failure. J Clin Onc. 2011.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), University of Helsinki (FI), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Turku (FI), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Kuopio University Hospital (FI), Faron Pharmaceutical (Finland) (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI), Smilow Cancer Hospital (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.