Infection Risk and Efficacy of Anti-BCMA Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: A Real-World Propensity Score-Matched Study

Introduction: Early mortality in multiple myeloma (MM) due to progressive disease or severe infections remains a concern. Novel anti-B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are associated with a risk of severe infection. This study describes the infection risk and efficacy of anti-BCMA BsAbs in a real-world setting using a propensity score-matched cohort. Materials and method: Patients with triple-class and penta-refractory MM from 10 centers within Greater Paris University Hospitals (AP-HP) were included. Data were acquired from the AP-HP Clinical Data Warehouse. We compared 201 patients treated with a BsAb (148 teclistamab, 53 elranatamab) from July 2022 to January 2024, with 162 control patients treated from January 2017 to December 2021 using propensity score matching. Key matching parameters included age, sex, ISS stage, performance status, number of prior treatment lines, monoclonal component, lymphopenia, neutropenia, LDH, albumin levels, and renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 3 infections. Secondary endpoints in BsAbs patients were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Event rates were standardized per 100 patient-years (/100 PY). Patient Characteristics: Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 9-16) for BsAb patients. Median age was 70 years for BsAb patients and 67 years for controls. ISS stages I, II and III were 34.8%, 24.9% and 40.3% in BsAb patients and 33.3%, 20.4%, and 46.3% in controls. Poor performance status (WHO 2-4) was reported in 46.8% of BsAb patients and 42.6% of controls. In the BsAb group, 72.1% were penta-drug refractory. Median last PFS before BsAb was 8 months (IQR 4-12). Bone lesions were noted in 79.1% of BsAb patients (59.7% with ≥ 3 lesions). High-risk cytogenetics were present in 22.9% of BsAb patients. Infections: BsAb patients had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 3 infections (98.2/100 PY) than controls (27.1/100 PY; p<0.001), with more bacterial (65.4/100 PY vs. 16.8/100 PY; p<0.001), respiratory (26.7/100 PY vs. 8.6/100 PY; p<0.05), and opportunistic viral infections (13.3/100 PY vs. 3.2/100 PY; p<0.05). Fungal infections were similar between groups (4.6/100 PY vs. 7.4/100 PY; p=not significant [NS]). Intensive care unit and emergency visits were more frequent in BsAb patients (70.3/100 PY) versus controls (42.5/100 PY; p=NS). No significant difference in grade ≥ 3 infections was observed between teclistamab (84.9/100 PY) and elranatamab (144.1/100 PY). Efficacy: Response rates for teclistamab and elranatamab were similar: complete response (33.1% vs. 37.7%), very good partial response (15.5% vs. 7.5%), partial response (16.2% vs. 17%), and stable or progressive disease (35.1% vs. 37.7%) (p=NS). The 12-month TTF rates were 0.58 for teclistamab and 0.41 for elranatamab (p<0.05). Treatment failure due to progression was 45.2/100 PY for teclistamab and 56.9/100 PY for elranatamab (p=NS). Intolerance-related treatment failure was 13.3/100 PY for teclistamab and 28.5/100 PY for elranatamab (p=NS). Treatment interruptions (median: 18 days) due to intolerance were similar between BsAb groups. Treatment frequency changed in 27.4% of BsAb patients, mostly from weekly to bimonthly. Survival: OS was significantly better for teclistamab than for elranatamab (p<0.05), with 12-month OS rates of 0.73 and 0.54, respectively. Median PFS was not reached for teclistamab and was 9.3 months for elranatamab (p=NS). Hypoalbuminemia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% CI, 1.02-3.31), renal failure (HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.05-3.50), monoclonal protein level (HR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02-3.00), and poor performance status (HR 2.63; 95% CI, 1.56-4.42) were significantly associated with increased risk of progression or death. Immunoglobulin supplementation was associated with a lower risk of progression or death (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.95). Adverse Events: Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50.2% of BsAb patients (2% grade ≥ 3); 38.6% required tocilizumab. Neurotoxicity was reported in 8.5% of BsAb patients (5.9% grade ≥ 3). Conclusion: BsAb treatment is associated with a high risk of infections in this real-world study. However, appropriate prevention, including immunoglobulin therapy, can reduce this risk and improve patients' survival. Teclistamab and elranatamab showed similar toxicity profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-199978
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infection Risk and Efficacy of Anti-BCMA Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: A Real-World Propensity Score-Matched Study

Karim Belhadj Merzoug, H. Stephanie, Sylvain Choquet, Mohamad Mohty et al.
Blood
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Infection Risk and Efficacy of Anti-BCMA Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: A Real-World Propensity Score-Matched Study

Karim Belhadj Merzoug, H. Stephanie, Sylvain Choquet, Mohamad Mohty, Cyrielle Rodier, Jérémie Zerbit, Guillemette Fouquet, Sabine Bréchignac, Olivier Hermine, Zoé Van de Wyngaert, Mathis Collier, Rachel L. Winer, Laurent Frenzel, Didier Bouscary, Clarisse Cazelles, Marguerite Vignon, Laurent Garderet, Marion Detroit
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Early mortality in multiple myeloma (MM) due to progressive disease or severe infections remains a concern. Novel anti-B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are associated with a risk of severe infection. This study describes the infection risk and efficacy of anti-BCMA BsAbs in a real-world setting using a propensity score-matched cohort. Materials and method: Patients with triple-class and penta-refractory MM from 10 centers within Greater Paris University Hospitals (AP-HP) were included. Data were acquired from the AP-HP Clinical Data Warehouse. We compared 201 patients treated with a BsAb (148 teclistamab, 53 elranatamab) from July 2022 to January 2024, with 162 control patients treated from January 2017 to December 2021 using propensity score matching. Key matching parameters included age, sex, ISS stage, performance status, number of prior treatment lines, monoclonal component, lymphopenia, neutropenia, LDH, albumin levels, and renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 3 infections. Secondary endpoints in BsAbs patients were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Event rates were standardized per 100 patient-years (/100 PY). Patient Characteristics: Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 9-16) for BsAb patients. Median age was 70 years for BsAb patients and 67 years for controls. ISS stages I, II and III were 34.8%, 24.9% and 40.3% in BsAb patients and 33.3%, 20.4%, and 46.3% in controls. Poor performance status (WHO 2-4) was reported in 46.8% of BsAb patients and 42.6% of controls. In the BsAb group, 72.1% were penta-drug refractory. Median last PFS before BsAb was 8 months (IQR 4-12). Bone lesions were noted in 79.1% of BsAb patients (59.7% with ≥ 3 lesions). High-risk cytogenetics were present in 22.9% of BsAb patients. Infections: BsAb patients had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 3 infections (98.2/100 PY) than controls (27.1/100 PY; p<0.001), with more bacterial (65.4/100 PY vs. 16.8/100 PY; p<0.001), respiratory (26.7/100 PY vs. 8.6/100 PY; p<0.05), and opportunistic viral infections (13.3/100 PY vs. 3.2/100 PY; p<0.05). Fungal infections were similar between groups (4.6/100 PY vs. 7.4/100 PY; p=not significant [NS]). Intensive care unit and emergency visits were more frequent in BsAb patients (70.3/100 PY) versus controls (42.5/100 PY; p=NS). No significant difference in grade ≥ 3 infections was observed between teclistamab (84.9/100 PY) and elranatamab (144.1/100 PY). Efficacy: Response rates for teclistamab and elranatamab were similar: complete response (33.1% vs. 37.7%), very good partial response (15.5% vs. 7.5%), partial response (16.2% vs. 17%), and stable or progressive disease (35.1% vs. 37.7%) (p=NS). The 12-month TTF rates were 0.58 for teclistamab and 0.41 for elranatamab (p<0.05). Treatment failure due to progression was 45.2/100 PY for teclistamab and 56.9/100 PY for elranatamab (p=NS). Intolerance-related treatment failure was 13.3/100 PY for teclistamab and 28.5/100 PY for elranatamab (p=NS). Treatment interruptions (median: 18 days) due to intolerance were similar between BsAb groups. Treatment frequency changed in 27.4% of BsAb patients, mostly from weekly to bimonthly. Survival: OS was significantly better for teclistamab than for elranatamab (p<0.05), with 12-month OS rates of 0.73 and 0.54, respectively. Median PFS was not reached for teclistamab and was 9.3 months for elranatamab (p=NS). Hypoalbuminemia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% CI, 1.02-3.31), renal failure (HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.05-3.50), monoclonal protein level (HR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02-3.00), and poor performance status (HR 2.63; 95% CI, 1.56-4.42) were significantly associated with increased risk of progression or death. Immunoglobulin supplementation was associated with a lower risk of progression or death (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.95). Adverse Events: Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 50.2% of BsAb patients (2% grade ≥ 3); 38.6% required tocilizumab. Neurotoxicity was reported in 8.5% of BsAb patients (5.9% grade ≥ 3). Conclusion: BsAb treatment is associated with a high risk of infections in this real-world study. However, appropriate prevention, including immunoglobulin therapy, can reduce this risk and improve patients' survival. Teclistamab and elranatamab showed similar toxicity profiles.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Hôpital Cochin (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Saint-Antoine (FR), Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.