Efficacy and Safety of Teclistamab in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Long-Term Follow-up from a Real World Multi-Institutional Cohort

Introduction: Teclistamab is a B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting bispecific antibody (bsAb) that is approved in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received at least four prior lines of therapy. In this study, we report long-term follow-up data regarding the safety and efficacy of teclistamab in a real-world multi-institutional cohort. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 168 patients with RRMM who received at least one dose of teclistamab across 5 academic medical centers in the US. Infection incidence was evaluated from the date of teclistamab initiation through the date of last follow-up or 60 days after discontinuation of therapy. Responses were adjudicated as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age of our cohort was 70 years (range: 31- 89) and 49% were female. Black patients constituted 25% of the cohort. Most patients (65%) had high risk cytogenetics and either triple-class refractory (83%) or penta-refractory (52%) disease. Extraosseous extramedullary disease (EMD) was seen in 43 patients (28%) prior to starting teclistamab, and relatively few patients had CNS involvement (1.8%), plasma cell leukemia (6.5%), or concomitant AL amyloidosis (4.2%). The median prior lines of therapy were 5 (range 1-12) with the majority having received at least one prior autologous stem cell transplantation (95%). At the time of teclistamab initiation, 92% of patients had evidence of progressive disease and 55 patients (33%) had received prior BCMA-targeted therapy. Among those with prior BCMA exposure, the most common therapy used was BCMA CAR T-cell therapy (n=34; 62%), followed by BCMA antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) (n=18; 33%), and BCMA bsAb (n=5; 9.1%). Notably, 2 patients received both prior BCMA CAR T and ADC. Patients received a median of 15 teclistamab doses (range 1 - 49) and were followed for a median of 8.5 months from treatment initiation. The overall response rate (ORR) in our cohort was 71%, with a very good partial response (VGPR) or better in 60% of patients. The median time to best response was 2.94 months. No baseline clinical characteristic demonstrated a statistically significant association with ORR on multivariable analysis. Specifically, age (odds ratio (OR) 0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p = 0.67), prior BCMA-targeted therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.29-2.54, p = 0.77), and the presence of high-risk cytogenetics (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.17-1.23, p = 0.14) were not significant predictors. In our cohort, the estimated PFS rates at 6 and 12 months were 58% and 49%, respectively, while the OS rates were 81% and 68%, respectively. The median PFS and OS was 12 months (95% CI, 7.1-15) and 18 months (15-NR) respectively. The incidence of grade 1/2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 53%, with only 1 patient (0.6%) experiencing grade 3 CRS. The incidence of grade 1/2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was 7.2%, with 3 patients (1.8%) experiencing grade 3 ICANS. Of those with CRS/ICANS, 29 patients (17%) received systemic steroids and 45 patients (27%) received tocilizumab. Within this cohort, 99% of patients received herpes prophylaxis, 73% pneumocystis prophylaxis, 43% primary or secondary prophylaxis with intravenous immunoglobulin, 19% prophylactic antibiotics, and 16% antifungal prophylaxis. Overall, a total of 181 infections were diagnosed in 92 patients in this cohort, with 100 of these being ≥ grade 3 infections (55.2%), and 79% of infections confirmed microbiologically. The cumulative incidence of all-grade infections at 3 months and 6 months was 43% and 54% respectively, with the respective cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 infections being 23% and 34%. The estimated rate of all-grade and grade ≥3 infections per 100 days was 0.61 (±0.07) and 0.33 (±0.06) respectively. There were four grade 5 infections (2.2%) observed. Conclusion: Despite a significantly higher proportion of patients with triple-class refractory and penta-refractory disease in our cohort compared to the MajesTEC-1 trial, teclistamab demonstrated a comparable ORR and ≥VGPR rate. Additionally, with the implementation of robust infection prophylaxis, the rates of all-grade and grade 3-5 infections were favorable compared to clinical trial data. Further follow-up data will be presented at the meeting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-203609
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Teclistamab in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Long-Term Follow-up from a Real World Multi-Institutional Cohort

Mansi R. Shah, Vineel Bhatlapenumarthi, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Sharmilan Thanendrarajan et al.
Blood
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Efficacy and Safety of Teclistamab in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Long-Term Follow-up from a Real World Multi-Institutional Cohort

Mansi R. Shah, Vineel Bhatlapenumarthi, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Sharmilan Thanendrarajan, Metodi Balev, Anannya Patwari, Anikó Szabó, Suzanne Lentzsch, Asis Shrestha, Anita D’Souza, Samer Al Hadidi, Carolina Schinke, Nishi Shah, Danny Luan, Mark Forsberg, Meera Mohan, Dennis Cooper, Heloise Cheruvalath, Maurizio Zangari, Frits van Rhee, Binod Dhakal, Jorge Monge, Divaya Bhutani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Teclistamab is a B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting bispecific antibody (bsAb) that is approved in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received at least four prior lines of therapy. In this study, we report long-term follow-up data regarding the safety and efficacy of teclistamab in a real-world multi-institutional cohort. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 168 patients with RRMM who received at least one dose of teclistamab across 5 academic medical centers in the US. Infection incidence was evaluated from the date of teclistamab initiation through the date of last follow-up or 60 days after discontinuation of therapy. Responses were adjudicated as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age of our cohort was 70 years (range: 31- 89) and 49% were female. Black patients constituted 25% of the cohort. Most patients (65%) had high risk cytogenetics and either triple-class refractory (83%) or penta-refractory (52%) disease. Extraosseous extramedullary disease (EMD) was seen in 43 patients (28%) prior to starting teclistamab, and relatively few patients had CNS involvement (1.8%), plasma cell leukemia (6.5%), or concomitant AL amyloidosis (4.2%). The median prior lines of therapy were 5 (range 1-12) with the majority having received at least one prior autologous stem cell transplantation (95%). At the time of teclistamab initiation, 92% of patients had evidence of progressive disease and 55 patients (33%) had received prior BCMA-targeted therapy. Among those with prior BCMA exposure, the most common therapy used was BCMA CAR T-cell therapy (n=34; 62%), followed by BCMA antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) (n=18; 33%), and BCMA bsAb (n=5; 9.1%). Notably, 2 patients received both prior BCMA CAR T and ADC. Patients received a median of 15 teclistamab doses (range 1 - 49) and were followed for a median of 8.5 months from treatment initiation. The overall response rate (ORR) in our cohort was 71%, with a very good partial response (VGPR) or better in 60% of patients. The median time to best response was 2.94 months. No baseline clinical characteristic demonstrated a statistically significant association with ORR on multivariable analysis. Specifically, age (odds ratio (OR) 0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p = 0.67), prior BCMA-targeted therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.29-2.54, p = 0.77), and the presence of high-risk cytogenetics (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.17-1.23, p = 0.14) were not significant predictors. In our cohort, the estimated PFS rates at 6 and 12 months were 58% and 49%, respectively, while the OS rates were 81% and 68%, respectively. The median PFS and OS was 12 months (95% CI, 7.1-15) and 18 months (15-NR) respectively. The incidence of grade 1/2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 53%, with only 1 patient (0.6%) experiencing grade 3 CRS. The incidence of grade 1/2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was 7.2%, with 3 patients (1.8%) experiencing grade 3 ICANS. Of those with CRS/ICANS, 29 patients (17%) received systemic steroids and 45 patients (27%) received tocilizumab. Within this cohort, 99% of patients received herpes prophylaxis, 73% pneumocystis prophylaxis, 43% primary or secondary prophylaxis with intravenous immunoglobulin, 19% prophylactic antibiotics, and 16% antifungal prophylaxis. Overall, a total of 181 infections were diagnosed in 92 patients in this cohort, with 100 of these being ≥ grade 3 infections (55.2%), and 79% of infections confirmed microbiologically. The cumulative incidence of all-grade infections at 3 months and 6 months was 43% and 54% respectively, with the respective cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 infections being 23% and 34%. The estimated rate of all-grade and grade ≥3 infections per 100 days was 0.61 (±0.07) and 0.33 (±0.06) respectively. There were four grade 5 infections (2.2%) observed. Conclusion: Despite a significantly higher proportion of patients with triple-class refractory and penta-refractory disease in our cohort compared to the MajesTEC-1 trial, teclistamab demonstrated a comparable ORR and ≥VGPR rate. Additionally, with the implementation of robust infection prophylaxis, the rates of all-grade and grade 3-5 infections were favorable compared to clinical trial data. Further follow-up data will be presented at the meeting.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Cornell University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Rutgers Cancer Institute (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Prothena, EUSA Pharma, Genentech, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech, Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.