Measuring the Utility of the Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (aMBQ) in a Culturally Diverse Adolescent Population

Introduction Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is common in menstruating adolescents. Accurately identifying HMB can be clinically challenging due to difficulties in measuring blood loss. The Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (PBAC) assesses menstrual blood loss via sanitary product saturation but does not capture the full patient experience. Given the significant emotional, physical, and social impacts of HMB, assessing its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is essential for comprehensive evaluation and management. The Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (aMBQ), adapted from the MBQ and validated by Pike et al. (2021) with 75 participants in Nova Scotia, Canada, assesses QoL related to menstrual bleeding in adolescents ≤18. This study aims to measure the utility of the aMBQ in a larger, more culturally diverse adolescent population. Methods Participants were recruited from primary care clinics at Nationwide Children's Hospital (Columbus, OH)- which serves a diverse and predominantly underserved population. Those with a prior diagnosis of a bleeding disorder or chronic illness associated with iron deficiency were excluded. HMB was defined as PBAC score ≥100. The aMBQ is a 21-item instrument with scores ranging from 0-77; higher scores indicate worse HRQoL. Statistical analyses were conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher's exact test, two-sample t-tests, and two-way ANOVA test, with significance set at p<0.05. The aMBQ's ability to distinguish between participants with and without HMB was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) and corresponding 95% CI from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results A total of 320 participants completed the aMBQ and PBAC. Median PBAC score was 94 (IQR 50 -186), and median aMBQ score was 17 (IQR 11-25). 65% of participants identified as Black, 18% White, 17% other races, and 8% as Hispanic. Mean age was 14.8 years (SD 2.1). 46.9% of participants (n=150) had HMB (PBAC ≥100). Median aMBQ score for those with HMB was higher than those without HMB (24, IQR 17-30 vs. 13, IQR 9-17; p < .001), indicating decreased HRQoL, consistent with the original study. Median age of adolescents with HMB was also significantly higher (15 vs 14 yrs, p=0.002), as was the median time since menarche (4 vs 2 yrs, p < .001). No significant difference in race/ethnicity was observed between the groups. Age at menarche did not significantly differ between those with and without HMB, consistent with the original study. Mean (±SD) aMBQ score for participants with HMB was significantly higher in the original study (29.8, ± 8.5) compared to this study (24.2, ± 9.3; p=0.0105). For those without HMB, the mean aMBQ score in the original study was 19.6 (± 7.6) versus 14.3 (± 7.6) in this study (p=0.0026). The aMBQ had an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) for HMB (PBAC ≥100). An optimal aMBQ cutoff score of 16.5 showed 79% sensitivity and 71% specificity, compared to the original study's cutoff of ≥30, which had 70% sensitivity and 84% specificity. Personal communication with Pike et al. suggests that a cutoff of 16 in the original study yields similar sensitivity (78%) and specificity (68%). In a sub-analysis with PBAC ≥150 denoting HMB, the mean aMBQ score for those with HMB was 26.3 (± 9.4) vs 15.4 (± 7.8) for those without (p < .001), with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87) and a cutoff score of 17.5, 69% sensitivity, and 82% specificity. Conclusion This study evaluated the aMBQ in a culturally diverse adolescent cohort, supporting its discriminatory power and utility in assessing HRQoL in menstruating adolescents. The substantial impact of HMB on adolescents' HRQoL, as demonstrated by higher aMBQ scores, highlights the importance of including quality of life measures in HMB evaluation. Higher reported HRQoL compared to the original study may be due to cultural differences in perception and reporting, or a higher prevalence of chronic conditions. Menstrual issues may seem less significant amidst other life challenges and adolescents in underserved populations may have developed coping mechanisms to manage HMB. Future research should further examine the aMBQ across various demographic groups and cultures to enhance its applicability. Reference Pike M, et al. Quality of life in adolescents with heavy menstrual bleeding: Validation of the Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Nov 8;5(7):e12615.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-212183
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Utility of the Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (aMBQ) in a Culturally Diverse Adolescent Population

Meghan Pike, Joseph Stanek, Sarah H. O’Brien, Adebimpe Adelaja et al.
2 citations
Blood
Menstrual Health and Disorders
1.09
article

Measuring the Utility of the Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (aMBQ) in a Culturally Diverse Adolescent Population

Meghan Pike, Joseph Stanek, Sarah H. O’Brien, Adebimpe Adelaja, Victoria Price
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is common in menstruating adolescents. Accurately identifying HMB can be clinically challenging due to difficulties in measuring blood loss. The Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (PBAC) assesses menstrual blood loss via sanitary product saturation but does not capture the full patient experience. Given the significant emotional, physical, and social impacts of HMB, assessing its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is essential for comprehensive evaluation and management. The Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (aMBQ), adapted from the MBQ and validated by Pike et al. (2021) with 75 participants in Nova Scotia, Canada, assesses QoL related to menstrual bleeding in adolescents ≤18. This study aims to measure the utility of the aMBQ in a larger, more culturally diverse adolescent population. Methods Participants were recruited from primary care clinics at Nationwide Children's Hospital (Columbus, OH)- which serves a diverse and predominantly underserved population. Those with a prior diagnosis of a bleeding disorder or chronic illness associated with iron deficiency were excluded. HMB was defined as PBAC score ≥100. The aMBQ is a 21-item instrument with scores ranging from 0-77; higher scores indicate worse HRQoL. Statistical analyses were conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher's exact test, two-sample t-tests, and two-way ANOVA test, with significance set at p<0.05. The aMBQ's ability to distinguish between participants with and without HMB was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) and corresponding 95% CI from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results A total of 320 participants completed the aMBQ and PBAC. Median PBAC score was 94 (IQR 50 -186), and median aMBQ score was 17 (IQR 11-25). 65% of participants identified as Black, 18% White, 17% other races, and 8% as Hispanic. Mean age was 14.8 years (SD 2.1). 46.9% of participants (n=150) had HMB (PBAC ≥100). Median aMBQ score for those with HMB was higher than those without HMB (24, IQR 17-30 vs. 13, IQR 9-17; p < .001), indicating decreased HRQoL, consistent with the original study. Median age of adolescents with HMB was also significantly higher (15 vs 14 yrs, p=0.002), as was the median time since menarche (4 vs 2 yrs, p < .001). No significant difference in race/ethnicity was observed between the groups. Age at menarche did not significantly differ between those with and without HMB, consistent with the original study. Mean (±SD) aMBQ score for participants with HMB was significantly higher in the original study (29.8, ± 8.5) compared to this study (24.2, ± 9.3; p=0.0105). For those without HMB, the mean aMBQ score in the original study was 19.6 (± 7.6) versus 14.3 (± 7.6) in this study (p=0.0026). The aMBQ had an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) for HMB (PBAC ≥100). An optimal aMBQ cutoff score of 16.5 showed 79% sensitivity and 71% specificity, compared to the original study's cutoff of ≥30, which had 70% sensitivity and 84% specificity. Personal communication with Pike et al. suggests that a cutoff of 16 in the original study yields similar sensitivity (78%) and specificity (68%). In a sub-analysis with PBAC ≥150 denoting HMB, the mean aMBQ score for those with HMB was 26.3 (± 9.4) vs 15.4 (± 7.8) for those without (p < .001), with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87) and a cutoff score of 17.5, 69% sensitivity, and 82% specificity. Conclusion This study evaluated the aMBQ in a culturally diverse adolescent cohort, supporting its discriminatory power and utility in assessing HRQoL in menstruating adolescents. The substantial impact of HMB on adolescents' HRQoL, as demonstrated by higher aMBQ scores, highlights the importance of including quality of life measures in HMB evaluation. Higher reported HRQoL compared to the original study may be due to cultural differences in perception and reporting, or a higher prevalence of chronic conditions. Menstrual issues may seem less significant amidst other life challenges and adolescents in underserved populations may have developed coping mechanisms to manage HMB. Future research should further examine the aMBQ across various demographic groups and cultures to enhance its applicability. Reference Pike M, et al. Quality of life in adolescents with heavy menstrual bleeding: Validation of the Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Nov 8;5(7):e12615.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Dalhousie University (CA), Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (CA), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.