Impact of Ultra Rapid Molecular Profiling on Treatment Delays and Healthcare Utilization of Patients Hospitalized for Acute Leukemia

Background Molecular testing is fundamental to treatment decisions in patients with acute leukemia. The impact of rapid molecular profiling on the timing of treatment initiation and healthcare utilization in patients hospitalized for suspected acute leukemia has not been described. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients hospitalized and treated for suspected acute leukemia at Massachusetts General Hospital between September 2023 and April 2024. We conducted a detailed workflow analysis comparing the time to obtaining molecular profiling results from admission [“time to results” or TTR] between routine (legacy) methods (i.e., RT-PCT, karyotype, FISH, targeted DNA and RNA sequencing) and an ultra-rapid genomic profiling test (Thermo Fisher Genexus Oncomine Myeloid Panel, or “Genexus”) which was run in parallel. We used linear regression models to evaluate the impact of TTR on time to treatment initiation from admission [TTTI] and hospital length of stay [LOS]. Results Of the 111 patients who had ultra-rapid genomic profiling conducted during the study period, 57 (51.4%) were adult patients who were hospitalized for diagnostic workup and treatment of suspected acute leukemia. The most common leukemia subtypes were acute myeloid leukemia (n=39/57, 68.4%), B-lymphoblastic leukemia (n=9/57, 15.8%), and acute promyelocytic leukemia (n=4/57, 7.0%). The mean TTTI was 5.2 days (range 1-17) and mean LOS was 30.9 days (range 3-86). Genexus had a mean TTR of 3.1 days (range 1-8), whereas legacy methods had a mean TTR of 5.4 days (range 3-10). Longer TTR was associated with longer TTTI (b=0.95; SE=0.20; P=<0.001) and longer LOS (b=4.08; SE=1.30; P=<0.003). Conclusions Ultra-rapid molecular profiling reduces the time to obtaining actionable genetic sequencing results for patients hospitalized for suspected acute leukemia by 2 days compared to legacy methods. Delays in obtaining molecular profiling of these patients is associated with treatment initiation delays and longer hospital length of stay, underscoring the importance of expanded access to ultra-rapid molecular profiling for acute leukemia. Further work is needed to elucidate the full economic impact of ultra-rapid molecular profiling on overall healthcare utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-208059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Ultra Rapid Molecular Profiling on Treatment Delays and Healthcare Utilization of Patients Hospitalized for Acute Leukemia

David A. Leonard, Tejaswini Dhawale, Adam Z. Bard, Charlotte Wang et al.
1 citations
Blood
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
0.54
article

Impact of Ultra Rapid Molecular Profiling on Treatment Delays and Healthcare Utilization of Patients Hospitalized for Acute Leukemia

David A. Leonard, Tejaswini Dhawale, Adam Z. Bard, Charlotte Wang, Timothy Aaron Graubert, Valentina Nardi, Amir T. Fathi, Natalia Essigmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Molecular testing is fundamental to treatment decisions in patients with acute leukemia. The impact of rapid molecular profiling on the timing of treatment initiation and healthcare utilization in patients hospitalized for suspected acute leukemia has not been described. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients hospitalized and treated for suspected acute leukemia at Massachusetts General Hospital between September 2023 and April 2024. We conducted a detailed workflow analysis comparing the time to obtaining molecular profiling results from admission [“time to results” or TTR] between routine (legacy) methods (i.e., RT-PCT, karyotype, FISH, targeted DNA and RNA sequencing) and an ultra-rapid genomic profiling test (Thermo Fisher Genexus Oncomine Myeloid Panel, or “Genexus”) which was run in parallel. We used linear regression models to evaluate the impact of TTR on time to treatment initiation from admission [TTTI] and hospital length of stay [LOS]. Results Of the 111 patients who had ultra-rapid genomic profiling conducted during the study period, 57 (51.4%) were adult patients who were hospitalized for diagnostic workup and treatment of suspected acute leukemia. The most common leukemia subtypes were acute myeloid leukemia (n=39/57, 68.4%), B-lymphoblastic leukemia (n=9/57, 15.8%), and acute promyelocytic leukemia (n=4/57, 7.0%). The mean TTTI was 5.2 days (range 1-17) and mean LOS was 30.9 days (range 3-86). Genexus had a mean TTR of 3.1 days (range 1-8), whereas legacy methods had a mean TTR of 5.4 days (range 3-10). Longer TTR was associated with longer TTTI (b=0.95; SE=0.20; P=<0.001) and longer LOS (b=4.08; SE=1.30; P=<0.003). Conclusions Ultra-rapid molecular profiling reduces the time to obtaining actionable genetic sequencing results for patients hospitalized for suspected acute leukemia by 2 days compared to legacy methods. Delays in obtaining molecular profiling of these patients is associated with treatment initiation delays and longer hospital length of stay, underscoring the importance of expanded access to ultra-rapid molecular profiling for acute leukemia. Further work is needed to elucidate the full economic impact of ultra-rapid molecular profiling on overall healthcare utilization.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Harvard University (US), Newton Wellesley Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.