Normalising inhomogeneities in geo-social media data – a comparison of different measures

Abstract Geo-social media data involve various kinds of inhomogeneities. These can concern, amongst others, the users, but also spatial distributions or the fact that the most frequently used hashtags, keywords or emojis often have little relevance in the context under investigation. In order to properly tackle and reduce these inhomogeneities and to strive for a less distorted analysis, normalisation of geo-social media data is expedient. Various measures exist that are frequently used in research for this purpose. This paper presents four of these measures and compares them with each other, both theoretically as well as practically in the form of a demonstration through three exemplary case studies highlighting potentials and limitations of each measure. This comparison involves the relatively new typicality measure, which was developed specifically for this type of data following the dimensions commonly used to describe geo-social media data (temporal, spatial, social and thematic dimension).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Network Analysis and Mining
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-024-01395-7
Primary Topic
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normalising inhomogeneities in geo-social media data – a comparison of different measures

Dirk Burghardt, Eva Hauthal, Sagnik Mukherjee
Social Network Analysis and Mining
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
article

Normalising inhomogeneities in geo-social media data – a comparison of different measures

Dirk Burghardt, Eva Hauthal, Sagnik Mukherjee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Geo-social media data involve various kinds of inhomogeneities. These can concern, amongst others, the users, but also spatial distributions or the fact that the most frequently used hashtags, keywords or emojis often have little relevance in the context under investigation. In order to properly tackle and reduce these inhomogeneities and to strive for a less distorted analysis, normalisation of geo-social media data is expedient. Various measures exist that are frequently used in research for this purpose. This paper presents four of these measures and compares them with each other, both theoretically as well as practically in the form of a demonstration through three exemplary case studies highlighting potentials and limitations of each measure. This comparison involves the relatively new typicality measure, which was developed specifically for this type of data following the dimensions commonly used to describe geo-social media data (temporal, spatial, social and thematic dimension).

Social Network Analysis and MiningVol. 14(1)
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Technische Universität Dresden
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.