CELESTIAL-TNCLL: An Ongoing, Open-Label, Multiregional, Phase 3 Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) + Zanubrutinib vs Venetoclax + Obinutuzumab for Treatment-Naive CLL

Introduction: The combination of venetoclax, the first-generation BCL2 inhibitor, and ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (Wierda et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021); however, the toxicity profile of this regimen suggests a need for a more tolerable BTK/BCL2 inhibitor combination. Sonrotoclax, a next-generation BCL2 inhibitor, is a more selective and more pharmacologically potent inhibitor of BCL2 than venetoclax. In a phase 1 study in patients with treatment-naive (TN) CLL treated with sonrotoclax + zanubrutinib, efficacy data was promising with ORR and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 100% and deep responses based on undetectable measurable residual disease at <10-4 sensitivity (uMRD4). The most common grade ≥3 TEAE was neutropenia, and no tumor lysis syndrome or cardiac toxicity was observed. Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, significantly improved PFS and had a more tolerable safety profile, including fewer cardiac adverse events vs ibrutinib in a randomized, head-to-head study of patients with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Presented here is the design of a phase 3 trial aimed at comparing the efficacy of sonrotoclax + zanubrutinib vs venetoclax + obinutuzumab in patients with TN CLL. Methods: CELESTIAL-TNCLL (BGB-11417-301; NCT06073821) is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study. Eligible patients must have previously untreated CLL that requires treatment per 2018 iwCLL criteria, measurable disease by CT/MRI, an ECOG performance score of 0-2, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Approximately 640 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 3 cycles of zanubrutinib monotherapy (320 mg total daily dose, orally), followed by zanubrutinib + sonrotoclax for 12 cycles, or standard venetoclax + obinutuzumab treatment for 12 cycles. Randomization will be stratified by age (<65 vs ≥65 years) and IGHV and del(17p)/TP53 mutation status. The primary endpoint is PFS as assessed by independent review committee (IRC) according to 2018 iwCLL guidelines with modifications for treatment-related lymphocytosis for patients with CLL. Key secondary endpoints include complete response rate (CRR), defined as CR or CR with incomplete hematopoietic recovery, assessed by IRC; rates of uMRD4 in bone marrow and peripheral blood at the first post-treatment follow-up visit based on next-generation sequencing by clonoSEQ®; and overall survival. Other secondary endpoints include PFS as assessed by investigator (INV); CRR by INV; rate of uMRD4 based on flow cytometry; overall response rate by IRC and INV; duration of response by IRC and INV; patient-reported outcomes; and safety and tolerability. Recruitment is ongoing at approximately 230 study sites in 20 countries, including 50 sites in the US, 6 in Brazil, and 15 in Canada.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-198737
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CELESTIAL-TNCLL: An Ongoing, Open-Label, Multiregional, Phase 3 Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) + Zanubrutinib vs Venetoclax + Obinutuzumab for Treatment-Naive CLL

Jennifer Ann Woyach, Talha Munir, Tommi Salmi, Piers Patten et al.
3 citations
Blood
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
1.31
article

CELESTIAL-TNCLL: An Ongoing, Open-Label, Multiregional, Phase 3 Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) + Zanubrutinib vs Venetoclax + Obinutuzumab for Treatment-Naive CLL

Jennifer Ann Woyach, Talha Munir, Tommi Salmi, Piers Patten, Mazyar Shadman, Arnon Philip Kater, Jianyong Li, Tian Tian, Patrick Phuong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The combination of venetoclax, the first-generation BCL2 inhibitor, and ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (Wierda et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021); however, the toxicity profile of this regimen suggests a need for a more tolerable BTK/BCL2 inhibitor combination. Sonrotoclax, a next-generation BCL2 inhibitor, is a more selective and more pharmacologically potent inhibitor of BCL2 than venetoclax. In a phase 1 study in patients with treatment-naive (TN) CLL treated with sonrotoclax + zanubrutinib, efficacy data was promising with ORR and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 100% and deep responses based on undetectable measurable residual disease at <10-4 sensitivity (uMRD4). The most common grade ≥3 TEAE was neutropenia, and no tumor lysis syndrome or cardiac toxicity was observed. Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, significantly improved PFS and had a more tolerable safety profile, including fewer cardiac adverse events vs ibrutinib in a randomized, head-to-head study of patients with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Presented here is the design of a phase 3 trial aimed at comparing the efficacy of sonrotoclax + zanubrutinib vs venetoclax + obinutuzumab in patients with TN CLL. Methods: CELESTIAL-TNCLL (BGB-11417-301; NCT06073821) is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study. Eligible patients must have previously untreated CLL that requires treatment per 2018 iwCLL criteria, measurable disease by CT/MRI, an ECOG performance score of 0-2, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Approximately 640 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either 3 cycles of zanubrutinib monotherapy (320 mg total daily dose, orally), followed by zanubrutinib + sonrotoclax for 12 cycles, or standard venetoclax + obinutuzumab treatment for 12 cycles. Randomization will be stratified by age (<65 vs ≥65 years) and IGHV and del(17p)/TP53 mutation status. The primary endpoint is PFS as assessed by independent review committee (IRC) according to 2018 iwCLL guidelines with modifications for treatment-related lymphocytosis for patients with CLL. Key secondary endpoints include complete response rate (CRR), defined as CR or CR with incomplete hematopoietic recovery, assessed by IRC; rates of uMRD4 in bone marrow and peripheral blood at the first post-treatment follow-up visit based on next-generation sequencing by clonoSEQ®; and overall survival. Other secondary endpoints include PFS as assessed by investigator (INV); CRR by INV; rate of uMRD4 based on flow cytometry; overall response rate by IRC and INV; duration of response by IRC and INV; patient-reported outcomes; and safety and tolerability. Recruitment is ongoing at approximately 230 study sites in 20 countries, including 50 sites in the US, 6 in Brazil, and 15 in Canada.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
King's College London (GB), University of Washington (US), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Jiangsu Province Hospital (CN), King's College Hospital (GB), The Ohio State University (US), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.