What Is the Optimal Dose of MMF in Single Cord Blood Transplantation?: A Single-Center Analysis of MMF Dosage for GVHD Prophylaxis and Its Impact on Outcomes

Introduction: Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is a valuable treatment option with the potential for curative outcomes in patients with myeloid malignancies in non-remission status, but relapse and early non-relapse mortality (NRM) remain significant barriers. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are widely used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in UCBT, but there is no consensus on the appropriate MMF dose for GVHD prophylaxis. We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the impact of MMF dose on outcomes in patients undergoing single UCBT with tacrolimus and MMF at our institution. Methods: We reviewed patients with myeloid malignancies who received their first single UCBT in non-remission status at our center between April 2010 and March 2023, administered tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients with poor performance status (ECOG PS 3-4) were excluded. The initial MMF dose was divided into three groups: MMF-Lo (<17 mg/kg), MMF-Int (17-23 mg/kg), and MMF-Hi (≥23 mg/kg). Primary endpoint: disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS), relapse incidence, NRM, neutrophil engraftment, acute GVHD, and severe preengraftment immune reactions (PIR). DFS and OS probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; differences were evaluated using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis examined the independent effect of MMF dose on outcomes, calculating hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Fine-Gray model was used to evaluate relapse, NRM, neutrophil engraftment, acute GVHD, and severe PIR, accommodating competing risks. Results: A total of 574 patients were enrolled, median age 63 years (range 16-79), 48% female. Diagnoses included AML (n=436), MDS (n=107), and MPN (n=31). 79.8% received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Median numbers of TNC and CD34-positive cells were 2.45x10^7/kg and 0.84x10^5/kg, respectively. MMF groups: 95 patients (16.6%) in MMF-Lo, 358 (62.4%) in MMF-Int, and 121 (21.1%) in MMF-Hi. MMF administration began the day before transplantation, median duration 41 days. Mean ages for MMF-Lo, MMF-Int, and MMF-Hi groups were 54, 63, and 66 years, with p-values <0.01 across groups. The 3-year OS and DFS were 39.6% and 37.5%. The 3-year NRM and relapse rates were 42.4% and 22.9%, with a cumulative neutrophil engraftment rate of 92.1% (median engraftment time 21 days). Significant differences in 3-year DFS were observed between MMF-Lo and MMF-Hi (p=0.03). OS rates were 53.0%, 37.9%, and 34.2%, with significant differences between MMF-Lo and MMF-Int (p=0.04) and MMF-Lo and MMF-Hi (p=0.02). No significant differences were observed in relapse rates. The 3-year cumulative incidence (CI) of NRM was 31.3%, 44.6%, and 45.2%, with significant differences between MMF-Lo and MMF-Int (p=0.03) and MMF-Lo and MMF-Hi (p=0.04). Neutrophil engraftment rates were 97.9%, 92.7%, and 86.0%, with significant differences between MMF-Lo and MMF-Hi (p<0.05). Severe PIR incidence showed no significant differences. The 100-day CI of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 68.4%, 63.1%, and 62.8%, with no significant differences. Multivariate analysis revealed age as a significant factor affecting OS, DFS, and NRM (p<0.01), while differences among MMF dose groups were not significant after adjustment. Subgroup analysis by age (≥60 and <60) and by disease showed no significant differences in DFS, OS, NRM, or relapse among the MMF dose groups. However, the MMF-Hi group had a significantly lower engraftment rate compared to the MMF-Lo group (HR=0.69, p=0.01). Other factors contributing to engraftment rate included the number of CD34-positive cells (HR=1.50, p=0.02) and female recipient sex (HR=1.21, p=0.04). Among 45 patients not achieving neutrophil engraftment, 36 died before engraftment. Nine experienced engraftment failure, with one case of hemophagocytic syndrome and the rest due to graft rejection.Discussion: MMF dose did not affect DFS, OS, NRM, relapse, or acute GVHD incidence, but an MMF dosage of more than 23 mg/kg was detrimental to neutrophil engraftment. Graft rejection was predominant among neutrophil engraftment failure cases, suggesting excessive donor cell suppression due to a higher dose of MMF might have lead to graft rejection and increased NRM. Therefore, an MMF dosage of less than 23 mg/kg is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-201930
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is the Optimal Dose of MMF in Single Cord Blood Transplantation?: A Single-Center Analysis of MMF Dosage for GVHD Prophylaxis and Its Impact on Outcomes

Naoyuki Uchida, Atsushi Wake, Kosei Kageyama, Johtaro Yamamoto et al.
1 citations
Blood
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
0.45
article

What Is the Optimal Dose of MMF in Single Cord Blood Transplantation?: A Single-Center Analysis of MMF Dosage for GVHD Prophylaxis and Its Impact on Outcomes

Naoyuki Uchida, Atsushi Wake, Kosei Kageyama, Johtaro Yamamoto, Shinsuke Takagi, Mika Kuno, Yuki Taya, Kyosuke Yamaguchi, Daisuke Kaji, Yuki Asano‐Mori, Hisashi Yamamoto, Go Yamamoto, Otoya Watanabe, Kazuya Ishiwata, Aya Nishida
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is a valuable treatment option with the potential for curative outcomes in patients with myeloid malignancies in non-remission status, but relapse and early non-relapse mortality (NRM) remain significant barriers. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are widely used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in UCBT, but there is no consensus on the appropriate MMF dose for GVHD prophylaxis. We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the impact of MMF dose on outcomes in patients undergoing single UCBT with tacrolimus and MMF at our institution. Methods: We reviewed patients with myeloid malignancies who received their first single UCBT in non-remission status at our center between April 2010 and March 2023, administered tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients with poor performance status (ECOG PS 3-4) were excluded. The initial MMF dose was divided into three groups: MMF-Lo (<17 mg/kg), MMF-Int (17-23 mg/kg), and MMF-Hi (≥23 mg/kg). Primary endpoint: disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS), relapse incidence, NRM, neutrophil engraftment, acute GVHD, and severe preengraftment immune reactions (PIR). DFS and OS probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; differences were evaluated using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis examined the independent effect of MMF dose on outcomes, calculating hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Fine-Gray model was used to evaluate relapse, NRM, neutrophil engraftment, acute GVHD, and severe PIR, accommodating competing risks. Results: A total of 574 patients were enrolled, median age 63 years (range 16-79), 48% female. Diagnoses included AML (n=436), MDS (n=107), and MPN (n=31). 79.8% received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Median numbers of TNC and CD34-positive cells were 2.45x10^7/kg and 0.84x10^5/kg, respectively. MMF groups: 95 patients (16.6%) in MMF-Lo, 358 (62.4%) in MMF-Int, and 121 (21.1%) in MMF-Hi. MMF administration began the day before transplantation, median duration 41 days. Mean ages for MMF-Lo, MMF-Int, and MMF-Hi groups were 54, 63, and 66 years, with p-values <0.01 across groups. The 3-year OS and DFS were 39.6% and 37.5%. The 3-year NRM and relapse rates were 42.4% and 22.9%, with a cumulative neutrophil engraftment rate of 92.1% (median engraftment time 21 days). Significant differences in 3-year DFS were observed between MMF-Lo and MMF-Hi (p=0.03). OS rates were 53.0%, 37.9%, and 34.2%, with significant differences between MMF-Lo and MMF-Int (p=0.04) and MMF-Lo and MMF-Hi (p=0.02). No significant differences were observed in relapse rates. The 3-year cumulative incidence (CI) of NRM was 31.3%, 44.6%, and 45.2%, with significant differences between MMF-Lo and MMF-Int (p=0.03) and MMF-Lo and MMF-Hi (p=0.04). Neutrophil engraftment rates were 97.9%, 92.7%, and 86.0%, with significant differences between MMF-Lo and MMF-Hi (p<0.05). Severe PIR incidence showed no significant differences. The 100-day CI of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 68.4%, 63.1%, and 62.8%, with no significant differences. Multivariate analysis revealed age as a significant factor affecting OS, DFS, and NRM (p<0.01), while differences among MMF dose groups were not significant after adjustment. Subgroup analysis by age (≥60 and <60) and by disease showed no significant differences in DFS, OS, NRM, or relapse among the MMF dose groups. However, the MMF-Hi group had a significantly lower engraftment rate compared to the MMF-Lo group (HR=0.69, p=0.01). Other factors contributing to engraftment rate included the number of CD34-positive cells (HR=1.50, p=0.02) and female recipient sex (HR=1.21, p=0.04). Among 45 patients not achieving neutrophil engraftment, 36 died before engraftment. Nine experienced engraftment failure, with one case of hemophagocytic syndrome and the rest due to graft rejection.Discussion: MMF dose did not affect DFS, OS, NRM, relapse, or acute GVHD incidence, but an MMF dosage of more than 23 mg/kg was detrimental to neutrophil engraftment. Graft rejection was predominant among neutrophil engraftment failure cases, suggesting excessive donor cell suppression due to a higher dose of MMF might have lead to graft rejection and increased NRM. Therefore, an MMF dosage of less than 23 mg/kg is recommended.

BloodVol. 144(Supplement 1)
Toranomon Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.