PREDICTING IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN CRITICAL ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS

Purpose: This study aims to establish and validate machine learning-based models to predict death in hospital among critical orthopedic trauma patients with sepsis or respiratory failure. Methods: This study collected 523 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database. All patients were randomly classified into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Six algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting machine (eXGBM), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), neural network (NN), and decision tree (DT), were used to develop and optimize models in the training cohort, and internal validation of these models were conducted in the validation cohort. Based on a comprehensive scoring system, which incorporated 10 evaluation metrics, the optimal model was obtained with the highest scores. An artificial intelligence (AI) application was deployed based on the optimal model in the study. Results: The in-hospital mortality was 19.69%. Among all developed models, the eXGBM had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value (0.951, 95% CI: 0.934-0.967), and it also showed the highest accuracy (0.902), precise (0.893), recall (0.915), and F1 score (0.904). Based on the scoring system, the eXGBM had the highest score of 53, followed by the RF model (43) and the NN model (39). The scores for the LR, SVM, and DT were 22, 36, and 17, respectively. The decision curve analysis confirmed that both the eXGBM and RF models provided substantial clinical net benefits. However, the eXGBM model consistently outperformed the RF model across multiple evaluation metrics, establishing itself as the superior option for predictive modeling in this scenario, with the RF model as a strong secondary choice. The Shapley Additive Explanation analysis revealed that Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, age, respiratory rate, Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score, and temperature were the most important five features contributing to the outcome. Conclusions: This study develops an artificial intelligence application to predict in-hospital mortality among critical orthopedic trauma patients with sepsis or respiratory failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shock
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0000000000002516
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PREDICTING IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN CRITICAL ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS

Baisheng Sun, Yong Qin, Si Hui Tan, Zhencan Han et al.
10 citations
Shock
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
6.91
article

PREDICTING IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN CRITICAL ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS

Baisheng Sun, Yong Qin, Si Hui Tan, Zhencan Han, Mingxing Lei, Tao Han, Shengjie Wang, Ze Long, Feng Lin
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to establish and validate machine learning-based models to predict death in hospital among critical orthopedic trauma patients with sepsis or respiratory failure. Methods: This study collected 523 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database. All patients were randomly classified into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Six algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting machine (eXGBM), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), neural network (NN), and decision tree (DT), were used to develop and optimize models in the training cohort, and internal validation of these models were conducted in the validation cohort. Based on a comprehensive scoring system, which incorporated 10 evaluation metrics, the optimal model was obtained with the highest scores. An artificial intelligence (AI) application was deployed based on the optimal model in the study. Results: The in-hospital mortality was 19.69%. Among all developed models, the eXGBM had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value (0.951, 95% CI: 0.934-0.967), and it also showed the highest accuracy (0.902), precise (0.893), recall (0.915), and F1 score (0.904). Based on the scoring system, the eXGBM had the highest score of 53, followed by the RF model (43) and the NN model (39). The scores for the LR, SVM, and DT were 22, 36, and 17, respectively. The decision curve analysis confirmed that both the eXGBM and RF models provided substantial clinical net benefits. However, the eXGBM model consistently outperformed the RF model across multiple evaluation metrics, establishing itself as the superior option for predictive modeling in this scenario, with the RF model as a strong secondary choice. The Shapley Additive Explanation analysis revealed that Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, age, respiratory rate, Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score, and temperature were the most important five features contributing to the outcome. Conclusions: This study develops an artificial intelligence application to predict in-hospital mortality among critical orthopedic trauma patients with sepsis or respiratory failure.

ShockVol. 63(6)
Central South University (CN), Harbin Medical University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Peking University (CN), Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
6.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.