Value-Based Decision-Making and Its Relation to Cognition and Processing Noise in Young and Older Adults

Abstract In all phases of life, people face decisions with important consequences. Weighing options involves using cognitive resources to assess valence, delay, and risk to achieve a desired outcome. Value-based decision-making changes over the lifespan, but studies disagree on the extent, domains, and mechanisms of this change. We assessed delay discounting, risk aversion for probabilistic gains, risk seeking for probabilistic losses, loss aversion as well as cognitive abilities, and processing noise in 86 young (25–38 years) and 93 older (63–76 years) adults. We tested whether decision-making differed between age groups and whether differences were mediated by cognitive abilities or processing noise as measured by reaction time variability and decision inconsistency. Older adults showed steeper delay discounting ( p = .003) and trended towards more risk aversion for gains ( p = .071). Age groups did not differ in risk seeking for losses or loss aversion. Lower decision consistency and better spatial working memory mediated older adults’ steeper delay discounting. The relationship between delay discounting and age persisted when controlling for both mediators, suggesting robust age differences in delay discounting. This persistent age difference implies mechanisms beyond noise or cognitive parameters, such as changing life circumstances or limited future perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Adult Development
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-024-09504-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value-Based Decision-Making and Its Relation to Cognition and Processing Noise in Young and Older Adults

Johannes Petzold, Michael N. Smolka, Franka Glöckner, Anja Richtmann
2 citations
Journal of Adult Development
Aging and Gerontology Research
2.05
article

Value-Based Decision-Making and Its Relation to Cognition and Processing Noise in Young and Older Adults

Johannes Petzold, Michael N. Smolka, Franka Glöckner, Anja Richtmann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In all phases of life, people face decisions with important consequences. Weighing options involves using cognitive resources to assess valence, delay, and risk to achieve a desired outcome. Value-based decision-making changes over the lifespan, but studies disagree on the extent, domains, and mechanisms of this change. We assessed delay discounting, risk aversion for probabilistic gains, risk seeking for probabilistic losses, loss aversion as well as cognitive abilities, and processing noise in 86 young (25–38 years) and 93 older (63–76 years) adults. We tested whether decision-making differed between age groups and whether differences were mediated by cognitive abilities or processing noise as measured by reaction time variability and decision inconsistency. Older adults showed steeper delay discounting ( p = .003) and trended towards more risk aversion for gains ( p = .071). Age groups did not differ in risk seeking for losses or loss aversion. Lower decision consistency and better spatial working memory mediated older adults’ steeper delay discounting. The relationship between delay discounting and age persisted when controlling for both mediators, suggesting robust age differences in delay discounting. This persistent age difference implies mechanisms beyond noise or cognitive parameters, such as changing life circumstances or limited future perspective.

Journal of Adult DevelopmentVol. 32(4)
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universität Dresden
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Aging and Gerontology Research
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.