The Problem of Artistry in Scientific Cinema of the 1930s (based on the Film “Physiology and Pathology of Higher Nervous Activity”)

The article examines the scientific film “Physiology and Pathology of Higher Nervous Activity” about the theory of Academician I. P. Pavlov. Based on archival documents first introduced into scientific discourse, the process of the film's creation is reconstructed, revealing fundamental contradictions in the attitudes of its participants. In the 1930s, which was a transitional period for Soviet scientific cinema, what both the Committee for Cinematography and the scientific advisers expected from a scientific film was, first and foremost, a stark presentation of documentary material addressing a narrow professional audience. The filmmakers, on the other hand, drawing on their experience in feature films, sought to influence the viewer through artistic means, and appealed to the widest possible audience. The article demonstrates that this clashing of values led to the creation of a hybrid product typical for the scientific cinema of the 1930s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Film Arts and Film Studies
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69975/2074-0832-2024-62-4-37-55
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science, Research, and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Problem of Artistry in Scientific Cinema of the 1930s (based on the Film “Physiology and Pathology of Higher Nervous Activity”)

S. V. Dymshits
1 citations
Journal of Film Arts and Film Studies
Science, Research, and Medicine
0.54
article

The Problem of Artistry in Scientific Cinema of the 1930s (based on the Film “Physiology and Pathology of Higher Nervous Activity”)

S. V. Dymshits
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article examines the scientific film “Physiology and Pathology of Higher Nervous Activity” about the theory of Academician I. P. Pavlov. Based on archival documents first introduced into scientific discourse, the process of the film's creation is reconstructed, revealing fundamental contradictions in the attitudes of its participants. In the 1930s, which was a transitional period for Soviet scientific cinema, what both the Committee for Cinematography and the scientific advisers expected from a scientific film was, first and foremost, a stark presentation of documentary material addressing a narrow professional audience. The filmmakers, on the other hand, drawing on their experience in feature films, sought to influence the viewer through artistic means, and appealed to the widest possible audience. The article demonstrates that this clashing of values led to the creation of a hybrid product typical for the scientific cinema of the 1930s.

Journal of Film Arts and Film StudiesVol. 16(4(62))
European University at Saint Petersburg (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Science, Research, and Medicine
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.